Re: [6lowpan] [ADs] AUTH48 [MF]: RFC 6282 <draft-ietf-6lowpan-hc-15.txt>

["Pascal Thubert (pthubert)" <[e-mail]>]

Hello Megan

I think that for consistency:

   LOWPAN_HC1 and LOWPAN_HC2 are insufficient for most practical uses of
   IPv6 in 6LoWPANs.  LOWPAN_HC1 is most effective for link-local

Should also become

   LOWPAN_HC1 and LOWPAN_HC2 are insufficient for most practical uses of
   IPv6 in IEEE 802.15.4-Based Networks. LOWPAN_HC1 is most effective
for link-local

Don't you think?

Pascal


> -----Original Message-----
> From: Megan Ferguson [mailto:[e-mail]]
> Sent: Tuesday, August 09, 2011 5:02 PM
> To: Carsten Bormann; Ralph Droms (rdroms); Pascal Thubert (pthubert)
> Cc: 6lowpan; RFC Editor; [e-mail]
> Subject: Re: [6lowpan] [ADs] AUTH48 [MF]: RFC 6282
<draft-ietf-6lowpan-hc-
> 15.txt>
> 
> Carsten, Pascal, and *ADs,
> 
> Thank you for your reply.  We have updated the title as requested.
Please
> note that we have also updated the expansion of 6LoWPAN (in the text)
to
> match that in the title of RFC 4919.  Additionally, we have updated
the short
> title that appears in the running header of the document (this is best
> reviewed in the text file below).  Please review and approve these
updates
> or let us know if a different approach in either of these additional
updates
> would be preferable.
> 
> http://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc6282-lastdiff.html
> 
> The text, XML, and comprehensive diff files are viewable at:
> 
> http://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc6282.txt
> http://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc6282.xml
> http://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc6282-diff.html
> 
> Note that it may be necessary for you to refresh your browser to view
> the most recent version of the document.  Please review the document
> carefully to ensure satisfaction as we do not make changes once the
> document has been published as an RFC.
> 
> Upon careful review, please contact us with any further updates or
with
> your approval of the document in its current form.
> 
> For the AUTH48 status of this document, please see:
> 
> http://www.rfc-editor.org/auth48/rfc6282
> 
> Thank you.
> 
> RFC Editor/mf
> 
> On Aug 8, 2011, at 1:44 PM, Carsten Bormann wrote:
> 
> > OK, I have reread all the messages, and I'm now ready to declare a
(rough)
> consensus for
> >
> > 	Compression Format for IPv6 Datagrams over IEEE 802.15.4-based
> Networks
> >
> > (with an ever so slight edge for the -based, which is different from
RFC
> 4944, but "Datagrams" is different, too).
> >
> > While there were a number of voices for keeping 6LoWPAN in the title
(as
> in RFC 4919), there did not seem to be consensus for that.
> >
> > I apologize for holding up this RFC for so long for what is pretty
much a
> bikeshed color issue.
> >
> > And, yes, I'm slowly getting back to IETF work, and will try to
start popping
> the stack.
> >
> > Gruesse, Carsten
> >