Re: [6lowpan] [Roll] slot for New Version of draft-qiu-roll-kemp-02.txt

Stephen Farrell <> Mon, 29 October 2012 17:31 UTC

Return-Path: <>
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5756721F86F3; Mon, 29 Oct 2012 10:31:48 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.413
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.413 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.186, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from ([]) by localhost ( []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id c4wftrsxB20w; Mon, 29 Oct 2012 10:31:47 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ( []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id BD34921F86E8; Mon, 29 Oct 2012 10:31:47 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2D760C781; Mon, 29 Oct 2012 17:31:26 +0000 (GMT)
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at
Received: from ([]) by localhost ( []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id RFTlVnDAqwCX; Mon, 29 Oct 2012 17:31:24 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from [] (unknown []) by (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 0694FC77B; Mon, 29 Oct 2012 17:31:24 +0000 (GMT)
Message-ID: <>
Date: Mon, 29 Oct 2012 17:31:23 +0000
From: Stephen Farrell <>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:16.0) Gecko/20121017 Thunderbird/16.0.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Carsten Bormann <>
References: <015901cdb0d3$d38cf1f0$7aa6d5d0$> <> <> <02a101cdb5f5$51109a70$f331cf50$> <>
In-Reply-To: <>
X-Enigmail-Version: 1.4.5
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Cc: "Turner, Sean P." <>, "'Keoh, Sye Loong'" <>,,
Subject: Re: [6lowpan] [Roll] slot for New Version of draft-qiu-roll-kemp-02.txt
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Working group discussion for IPv6 over LowPan networks <>
List-Unsubscribe: <>, <>
List-Archive: <>
List-Post: <>
List-Help: <>
List-Subscribe: <>, <>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 29 Oct 2012 17:31:48 -0000

Carsten, all,

On 10/29/2012 04:56 PM, Carsten Bormann wrote:
> On Oct 29, 2012, at 17:49, QIU Ying <> wrote:
>> which WG is best
> I think right now we don't know that.
> All WGs in the CN/N cluster have the problem and have some unfulfilled charter item in this space.
> So we can continue to play tourists and use the WG that happens to have the largest amount of space on the agenda...
> In SOLACE, we are discussing right now when to meet during the Atlanta IETF.

Would it be timely to spend 10 minutes on this during the saag

I'd really like that the security area not end up being surprised
by whatever is eventually decided so getting a presentation at
saag would be useful at the point where you more or less know
the direction, but are still flexible enough to deal with someone
who e.g. points out significant security issues.

It might be that waiting another meeting cycle or two would be
better if the basic ideas aren't yet firmed up.

So, is this work far enough advanced already for that to be
productive now or is it still so early it'd be counter-productive?
(And presenting at saag before you're ready could very well
be counter-productive - it can be a tough audience;-)


> It looks like we will meet on Sunday before the reception for some brainstorming and maybe on Monday during lunchtime for getting organized.
> If you are interested, please join the SOLACE mailing list:
> Grüße, Carsten
> _______________________________________________
> Roll mailing list