[6lowpan] Rechartering consensus...

Geoff Mulligan <geoff@mulligan.com> Tue, 19 June 2007 22:02 UTC

Return-path: <6lowpan-bounces@ietf.org>
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=stiedprmman1.va.neustar.com) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1I0lmt-0006OJ-GK; Tue, 19 Jun 2007 18:02:59 -0400
Received: from [10.91.34.44] (helo=ietf-mx.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1I0lmr-0006O1-UU for 6lowpan@lists.ietf.org; Tue, 19 Jun 2007 18:02:57 -0400
Received: from grab.coslabs.com ([199.233.92.34]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1I0lmr-0001k5-Fd for 6lowpan@lists.ietf.org; Tue, 19 Jun 2007 18:02:57 -0400
Received: from [199.233.92.20] (dev20.coslabs.com [199.233.92.20]) by grab.coslabs.com (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id l5JM2stX000508 for <6lowpan@lists.ietf.org>; Tue, 19 Jun 2007 16:02:56 -0600 (MDT)
From: Geoff Mulligan <geoff@mulligan.com>
To: 6lowpan <6lowpan@lists.ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="=-yTYnbJHe9Y+Vby1AO3t5"
Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2007 16:02:51 -0600
Message-Id: <1182290571.6218.29.camel@dellx1>
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Evolution 2.10.1
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: d2b46e3b2dfbff2088e0b72a54104985
Cc:
Subject: [6lowpan] Rechartering consensus...
X-BeenThere: 6lowpan@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Working group discussion for IPv6 over LowPan networks <6lowpan.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6lowpan>, <mailto:6lowpan-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www1.ietf.org/pipermail/6lowpan>
List-Post: <mailto:6lowpan@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:6lowpan-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6lowpan>, <mailto:6lowpan-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: 6lowpan-bounces@ietf.org

6LoWPAN group,
  It would appear that we have consensus on the work items for the
working group rechartering - the following 5 topics have been relatively
unchanged for months.

As I have been working with folks that are implementing 6LoWPAN and from
some of the messages on the list I have realized that we should probably
be focused on those topics that are necessary to resolve for
interoperability between implementations.  Some of the 5 items here are
targeted to this and some of the topics mentioned on the list, such as a
standard/defined MIC could fall under one of the topics.

- “6lowpan Bootstrapping and 6lowpan IPv6 ND Optimizations”
- “Problem Statement for Stateful Header Compression in 6lowpans”
- “Recommendations for 6lowpan Applications”
- “6lowpan Mesh Routing”
- “6lowpan Security Analysis”

I have attached a proposed new charter for the working group.

	geoff


_______________________________________________
6lowpan mailing list
6lowpan@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6lowpan