Re: [6lowpan] RE Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-ietf-6lowpan-nd-17.txt

matthieu.vial@non.schneider-electric.com Tue, 14 June 2011 12:10 UTC

Return-Path: <matthieu.vial@non.schneider-electric.com>
X-Original-To: 6lowpan@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: 6lowpan@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C99DF11E80AF; Tue, 14 Jun 2011 05:10:15 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 8SmoVOt7Pl5c; Tue, 14 Jun 2011 05:10:15 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mailX03.eud.schneider-electric.com (mailx03.eud.schneider-electric.com [205.167.7.41]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D91C011E8071; Tue, 14 Jun 2011 05:10:08 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ateui02.Schneider-Electric.com ([10.198.14.10]) by mailX03.eud.schneider-electric.com with ESMTP id 2011061413474943-138252 ; Tue, 14 Jun 2011 13:47:49 +0200
In-Reply-To: <4DF73172.9050100@acm.org>
To: Erik Nordmark <nordmark@acm.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Lotus Notes Release 6.5.6 March 06, 2007
From: matthieu.vial@non.schneider-electric.com
Message-ID: <OFDA6A8346.CD12A07F-ONC12578AF.0038C067-C12578AF.0042D6D1@Schneider-Electric.com>
Date: Tue, 14 Jun 2011 14:10:02 +0200
X-MIMETrack: Serialize by Router on ATEUI02.Schneider-Electric.com/T/SVR/Schneider at 14/06/2011 14:10:03, Serialize complete at 14/06/2011 14:10:03, Itemize by SMTP Server on AXEU3OUT.schneider-electric.com/X/SVR/SEIxtra at 14/06/2011 13:47:49, Serialize by Router on AXEU3OUT.schneider-electric.com/X/SVR/SEIxtra at 14/06/2011 13:47:50, Serialize complete at 14/06/2011 13:47:50
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Cc: 6lowpan-bounces@ietf.org, "6lowpan@ietf.org WG" <6lowpan@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [6lowpan] RE Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-ietf-6lowpan-nd-17.txt
X-BeenThere: 6lowpan@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Working group discussion for IPv6 over LowPan networks <6lowpan.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/6lowpan>, <mailto:6lowpan-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/6lowpan>
List-Post: <mailto:6lowpan@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:6lowpan-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6lowpan>, <mailto:6lowpan-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 14 Jun 2011 12:10:17 -0000

>A unicast RS is allowed in RFC 4861, so I think what you are proposing 
>is just an editorial change to make the options clearer to those who 
>haven't digested RFC 4861. Is my understanding correct?

Exactly.
If I'm right the behavior described in the example is defined neither in 
6LoWPAN ND section 5.3 nor in RFC 4861 section 6.3.7 even if RFC 4861 does 
not forbid it. IMHO it would be clearer to have all the options listed in 
section 5.3.

BTW the link to "Section 6.3.7" in section 5.3 is broken because it refers 
to 6LoWPAN ND instead of RFC 4861.

Matthieu