Re: [6lowpan] Does the 6lowpan WG want to close?

Ines Robles <mariainesrobles@googlemail.com> Sun, 17 June 2012 05:06 UTC

Return-Path: <mariainesrobles@googlemail.com>
X-Original-To: 6lowpan@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: 6lowpan@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1D15C21F85D6 for <6lowpan@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 16 Jun 2012 22:06:11 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.976
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.976 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id AzvvGxwoUmDP for <6lowpan@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 16 Jun 2012 22:06:10 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-ob0-f172.google.com (mail-ob0-f172.google.com [209.85.214.172]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4082F21F85D5 for <6lowpan@ietf.org>; Sat, 16 Jun 2012 22:06:10 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by obbwc20 with SMTP id wc20so5983387obb.31 for <6lowpan@ietf.org>; Sat, 16 Jun 2012 22:06:09 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=uuh7KO/oTFeA8MK2WmzBwo4Ais3ZQUAO3CFLyxtaaFg=; b=dkkfVc+SSG6sGAx8Pk6LSEoAOUb9am9CBzWPA1MpDPhdGiq0u4+8IxCXwjeXU5fFKW Uh48YlZ2KvYuIVsjSG6ZCG2QcwmHYuyALa1YZIHbEcp4Me4BP2kGhrwESm8Rb98XyCZ0 q8QGONg+5hvns7JIS1QyKjAryQ/0l4qTq7zVx/gaKIGoJjSGH1sa+r2/3xtkVyiHGVXU kzBnfVEHFyMHyyWskVRIagFPwk92aRJTb1YIdQvSJD30O8Juu4Ybce+CGcVvComywh4l HoFVQd7wTRWtQ+Etz01Gx/woRVBKs2+nqeZrOH3FZ9TdEajRLWqIYT0LR8Uiqq5WaUE7 WY6w==
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.60.8.8 with SMTP id n8mr11451533oea.38.1339909569717; Sat, 16 Jun 2012 22:06:09 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.182.58.134 with HTTP; Sat, 16 Jun 2012 22:06:09 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <6E4B70E6-C3BD-41A9-ADD4-A77A1F8C07DD@tzi.org>
References: <CAP+sJUdhZPXx9SxcrzSTovG85FuGh2WB=V1faUzyhyFs+Dw8Kg@mail.gmail.com> <6E4B70E6-C3BD-41A9-ADD4-A77A1F8C07DD@tzi.org>
Date: Sun, 17 Jun 2012 02:06:09 -0300
Message-ID: <CAP+sJUdbcDh0F31wRqUgx7FWeDm1VBCNk3HbhgesUY=x9ku4nA@mail.gmail.com>
From: Ines Robles <mariainesrobles@googlemail.com>
To: Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=e89a8ff1c6d4ef240304c2a4013a
Cc: 6lowpan@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [6lowpan] Does the 6lowpan WG want to close?
X-BeenThere: 6lowpan@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Working group discussion for IPv6 over LowPan networks <6lowpan.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/6lowpan>, <mailto:6lowpan-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/6lowpan>
List-Post: <mailto:6lowpan@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:6lowpan-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6lowpan>, <mailto:6lowpan-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 17 Jun 2012 05:06:11 -0000

>
>
> > I am just thinking that  a new  Milestone or Goal  would be:   802.15.7
> (Li-Fi)  +  6lowPAN.
>
> I haven't seen any document out of 802.15.7 yet, so I don't know how well
> the fit would be.
> Certainly a technology to watch.
>

Yes, I started recently reading about it, I keep looking how would be the
fit.

Thank you for the draft about, DECT-ULE, I'm going to look into it.

Regards,

Ines Robles.
UTN-FRM
Argentina