Re: [6lowpan] Does the 6lowpan WG want to close?

Carsten Bormann <> Mon, 18 June 2012 18:31 UTC

Return-Path: <>
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id E2FE521F8582 for <>; Mon, 18 Jun 2012 11:31:12 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -106.549
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-106.549 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.300, BAYES_00=-2.599, HELO_EQ_DE=0.35, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from ([]) by localhost ( []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id A3lvGbpr+ldZ for <>; Mon, 18 Jun 2012 11:31:12 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ( [IPv6:2001:638:708:30c9::12]) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id C6E8921F85A1 for <>; Mon, 18 Jun 2012 11:31:11 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at
Received: from ( []) by (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id q5IIUtmm016682; Mon, 18 Jun 2012 20:30:55 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from [] ( []) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 9DEC1D8; Mon, 18 Jun 2012 20:30:55 +0200 (CEST)
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1278)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
From: Carsten Bormann <>
In-Reply-To: <>
Date: Mon, 18 Jun 2012 20:30:54 +0200
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <>
References: <> <> <>
To: "Benjamin A. Rolfe" <>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1278)
Subject: Re: [6lowpan] Does the 6lowpan WG want to close?
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Working group discussion for IPv6 over LowPan networks <>
List-Unsubscribe: <>, <>
List-Archive: <>
List-Post: <>
List-Help: <>
List-Subscribe: <>, <>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 18 Jun 2012 18:31:13 -0000

On Jun 18, 2012, at 20:09, Benjamin A. Rolfe wrote:

> There are no ongoing projects to amend 802.15.7 at this time.

Thanks Ben.

So is there any other activity for getting IP going on top of Li-Fi?

A quick check seems to indicate:
-- as this re-uses 802.15.4's MAC, they'd need something like our dispatch scheme.
-- fragmentation is needed for PHY 1 (PHY frame size limited to 1023 B), not for the higher ones.
-- HC would probably help with the slower PHY 1, not so much with the faster ones.

Which of the PHYs is actually real?

Whether the 6LoWPAN network model (and thus 6LoWPAN-ND) fits is not clear to me -- much of Li-Fi's use will be unidirectional, as a fill-in for some other connectivity, and there will be a lot of star topology usage (see page 6).  Mesh forwarding (route-over/-under) usage appears less obvious to me.

Of course, the most important question is whether there are people interested in doing the work.
If there is energy and a clear objective, we will find a way to make this happen (in whatever WG the IETF chooses to do this).

Grüße, Carsten