Re: [6lowpan] Fwd: Re: which addresses can be registered?

Richard Kelsey <richard.kelsey@ember.com> Thu, 14 April 2011 23:56 UTC

Return-Path: <richard.kelsey@ember.com>
X-Original-To: 6lowpan@ietfc.amsl.com
Delivered-To: 6lowpan@ietfc.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfc.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E4981E06D0 for <6lowpan@ietfc.amsl.com>; Thu, 14 Apr 2011 16:56:05 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.289
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.289 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.310, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([208.66.40.236]) by localhost (ietfc.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id TwqRZac9nFNW for <6lowpan@ietfc.amsl.com>; Thu, 14 Apr 2011 16:56:05 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from p01c12o148.mxlogic.net (p01c12o148.mxlogic.net [208.65.145.71]) by ietfc.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 21FDFE0677 for <6lowpan@ietf.org>; Thu, 14 Apr 2011 16:56:05 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from unknown [216.236.254.3] (EHLO EMPIRE.hq.ember.com) by p01c12o148.mxlogic.net(mxl_mta-6.9.0-2) with ESMTP id 49987ad4.0.9267.00-352.19097.p01c12o148.mxlogic.net (envelope-from <richard.kelsey@ember.com>); Thu, 14 Apr 2011 17:56:05 -0600 (MDT)
X-MXL-Hash: 4da789952d4bbe44-6d7673d7af0c7e500d0834eec22be43e9be81ff9
Received: from kelsey-ws.hq.ember.com ([192.168.81.75]) by EMPIRE.hq.ember.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4675); Thu, 14 Apr 2011 19:56:04 -0400
Date: Thu, 14 Apr 2011 19:56:23 -0400
Message-Id: <87y63cqteg.fsf@kelsey-ws.hq.ember.com>
To: Erik Nordmark <nordmark@acm.org>
In-reply-to: <4DA783D4.6000309@acm.org> (message from Erik Nordmark on Thu, 14 Apr 2011 16:31:32 -0700)
From: Richard Kelsey <richard.kelsey@ember.com>
References: <4DA783D4.6000309@acm.org>
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 14 Apr 2011 23:56:04.0135 (UTC) FILETIME=[83949B70:01CBFAFF]
X-Spam: [F=0.2000000000; CM=0.500; S=0.200(2010122901)]
X-MAIL-FROM: <richard.kelsey@ember.com>
X-SOURCE-IP: [216.236.254.3]
X-AnalysisOut: [v=1.0 c=1 a=B2qiK0X5LMMA:10 a=saA6nF2ZJaAA:10 a=BLceEmwcHo]
X-AnalysisOut: [wA:10 a=MYqPJgym4Kx47q1P90kooQ==:17 a=N54-gffFAAAA:8 a=9wl]
X-AnalysisOut: [wK2QdeGf1MwhQd3YA:9 a=z8MPtEjXVtk54S7RRWEA:7 a=nAPXUAfsBmE]
X-AnalysisOut: [A:10 a=XAjgxnuZKhIVLtlh:21 a=uRUCTRsWPv2TZE_X:21]
Cc: 6lowpan@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [6lowpan] Fwd: Re: which addresses can be registered?
X-BeenThere: 6lowpan@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Working group discussion for IPv6 over LowPan networks <6lowpan.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/6lowpan>, <mailto:6lowpan-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/6lowpan>
List-Post: <mailto:6lowpan@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:6lowpan-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6lowpan>, <mailto:6lowpan-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 14 Apr 2011 23:56:06 -0000

> Date: Thu, 14 Apr 2011 16:31:32 -0700
> From: Erik Nordmark <nordmark@acm.org>
> 
> On 4/14/11 5:34 AM, Richard Kelsey wrote:
> > As far as I can tell from the 6LoWPAN ND draft, the only
> > addresses that cannot be registered are multicast addresses.
> > Is this correct?  For example, can a link-local address be
> > registered?  Can any prefix be used when registering with
> > any 6LBR?
> 
> The draft doesn't forbid registering a link-local address, but it also
> doesn't require it.

Thank you.  The question arose with respect to link-local
addresses derived from IEEE 802.15.4 16-bit short addresses,
which require some form of DAD.

Just to be clear, if there are two 6LBRs which advertise
different prefixes and a host configures addresses for
both prefixes, then both addresses need to be registered
with both 6LBRs?
                                  -Richard Kelsey