IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [6lowpan] [ADs] AUTH48 [MF]: RFC 6282 <draft-ietf-6lowpan-hc-15.txt>

Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org> Thu, 11 August 2011 09:36 UTC

Return-Path: <cabo@tzi.org>
X-Original-To: 6lowpan@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: 6lowpan@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D5D4E21F8AAF for <6lowpan@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 11 Aug 2011 02:36:08 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -106.249
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-106.249 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, HELO_EQ_DE=0.35, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id EHvdVWtY7vv1 for <6lowpan@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 11 Aug 2011 02:36:08 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from informatik.uni-bremen.de (mailhost.informatik.uni-bremen.de [IPv6:2001:638:708:30c9::12]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1E5A121F8AA9 for <6lowpan@ietf.org>; Thu, 11 Aug 2011 02:36:07 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at informatik.uni-bremen.de
Received: from smtp-fb3.informatik.uni-bremen.de (smtp-fb3.informatik.uni-bremen.de [134.102.224.120]) by informatik.uni-bremen.de (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id p7B9aSPS021769; Thu, 11 Aug 2011 11:36:28 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from [192.168.217.100] (p5489BB08.dip.t-dialin.net [84.137.187.8]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp-fb3.informatik.uni-bremen.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 3E4EB5CC; Thu, 11 Aug 2011 11:36:28 +0200 (CEST)
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1084)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
From: Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org>
In-Reply-To: <6A2A459175DABE4BB11DE2026AA50A5D05465A92@XMB-AMS-107.cisco.com>
Date: Thu, 11 Aug 2011 11:36:26 +0200
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <B60CCB66-D37E-4C96-89E8-F9AD38FD98D5@tzi.org>
References: <6A2A459175DABE4BB11DE2026AA50A5D05228480@XMB-AMS-107.cisco.com> <DE69914A-2813-4044-AEA7-A716FE2157CE@tzi.org> <56748029-05E7-4B09-8C50-C9EADD5629A0@tzi.org> <430C1B59-E048-4CC7-9E75-EF4E54D1104F@amsl.com> <6A2A459175DABE4BB11DE2026AA50A5D053A3C92@XMB-AMS-107.cisco.com> <EC44989C-2AEB-4D9E-975A-2950E88D86D8@cisco.com> <F5FB5007-BDDB-4E55-8249-CCE07FF201FF@tzi.org> <6A2A459175DABE4BB11DE2026AA50A5D05465A92@XMB-AMS-107.cisco.com>
To: "Pascal Thubert (pthubert)" <pthubert@cisco.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1084)
Cc: Megan Ferguson <mferguson@amsl.com>, RFC Editor <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>, 6lowpan <6lowpan@ietf.org>, 6lowpan-ads@tools.ietf.org, "Ralph Droms (rdroms)" <rdroms@cisco.com>
Subject: Re: [6lowpan] [ADs] AUTH48 [MF]: RFC 6282 <draft-ietf-6lowpan-hc-15.txt>
X-BeenThere: 6lowpan@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Working group discussion for IPv6 over LowPan networks <6lowpan.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/6lowpan>, <mailto:6lowpan-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/6lowpan>
List-Post: <mailto:6lowpan@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:6lowpan-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6lowpan>, <mailto:6lowpan-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 11 Aug 2011 09:36:09 -0000

> You do not understand. My observation is not about HC1's insufficiency.
> It is about the fact that we agreed that the network we are talking
> about is a "IEEE802.15.4-based network" as opposed to an "6LoWPAN".

Pascal: In the WG, we agreed about a title for that document.
Not about doing a wholesale replacement of the term "6LoWPAN" in all documents by "IEEE802.15.4-based network".
I would expect the outcome for a call for consensus to be different for the latter.
In any case, this is not the kind of change to make at AUTH48.  There is no emergency caused by the usage.

Please indicate to the RFC editor that you agree with publishing the document now.

Gruesse, Carsten

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email