Re: [6lowpan] nd-18 NCE

Thomas Chacko <my.mailing.acc@gmail.com> Wed, 08 February 2012 16:07 UTC

Return-Path: <my.mailing.acc@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: 6lowpan@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: 6lowpan@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A953B21F84F3 for <6lowpan@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 8 Feb 2012 08:07:29 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.876
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.876 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.122, BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, J_CHICKENPOX_55=0.6]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id JsVfRIHcQjcX for <6lowpan@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 8 Feb 2012 08:07:29 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-lpp01m020-f172.google.com (mail-lpp01m020-f172.google.com [209.85.217.172]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 741F221F8523 for <6lowpan@ietf.org>; Wed, 8 Feb 2012 08:07:28 -0800 (PST)
Received: by lbbgk8 with SMTP id gk8so396249lbb.31 for <6lowpan@ietf.org>; Wed, 08 Feb 2012 08:07:27 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=VrKP68kkXRNcPpdLuEdCHbQma0e+UVvJ12VILdQDimE=; b=Ym59o4HIvOy5r0u0az0tNh4fnUq9DnatfaFIOpZ4OrgiJEI9HR+rPtIuZcpNyW7MfB HU1U98QCVlwbAIYbN5MuE5NF/Cd7CmFTHJ94aEtiWHWpN+6k9/TteTvtV7hoXXbmmYOA n5/tY5EZigoyjsswB4S978xwwfNvXeKe/5jds=
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.152.114.74 with SMTP id je10mr15675949lab.40.1328717247191; Wed, 08 Feb 2012 08:07:27 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.112.76.164 with HTTP; Wed, 8 Feb 2012 08:07:27 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <CAHoqu_qMbL7aicOoZSG8mcKEeo1TzdhX0c02nD99X7KSDGJTYg@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAHoqu_qMbL7aicOoZSG8mcKEeo1TzdhX0c02nD99X7KSDGJTYg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 8 Feb 2012 21:37:27 +0530
Message-ID: <CAHoqu_pY3+b_yojkAMWzc5aim8jBOLcpCaVEscQVaQ90Sbacmg@mail.gmail.com>
From: Thomas Chacko <my.mailing.acc@gmail.com>
To: 6lowpan@ietf.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=f46d0408d7ed8699d404b87617a2
Subject: Re: [6lowpan] nd-18 NCE
X-BeenThere: 6lowpan@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Working group discussion for IPv6 over LowPan networks <6lowpan.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/6lowpan>, <mailto:6lowpan-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/6lowpan>
List-Post: <mailto:6lowpan@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:6lowpan-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6lowpan>, <mailto:6lowpan-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 08 Feb 2012 16:07:29 -0000

Hi All,

Will really appreciate if you could give some pointers.

Regards,
Thomas Chacko

On Tue, Feb 7, 2012 at 4:34 PM, Tom <my.mailing.acc@gmail.com> wrote:

>
> Hi All,
>
> Is there any state transition diagram available for the NCE maintenance in
> ND-18.
>
> Also, kindly clarify what does "A renewed ARO should mark the cache entry
> as STALE" .
>
> Is it to say that the first time a ARO is received the NCE becomes
> REGISTERED and for all the subsequent received AROs from the same node the
> NCE is set to STALE, but not grabage-collected and treated as REGISTERED.
>
> Or is that a NCE now has two state variables (4861 state = probe,stale etc
> and ND-18 state - registered or tentative).
>
> Regards,
> Thomas Chacko
>
>