Re: [6lowpan] Does the 6lowpan WG want to close?

Abdussalam Baryun <abdussalambaryun@gmail.com> Mon, 18 June 2012 11:42 UTC

Return-Path: <abdussalambaryun@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: 6lowpan@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: 6lowpan@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 377B221F84E1 for <6lowpan@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 18 Jun 2012 04:42:41 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.000, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id rYm160qmg-mk for <6lowpan@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 18 Jun 2012 04:42:40 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-vc0-f172.google.com (mail-vc0-f172.google.com [209.85.220.172]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8FAA321F84D9 for <6lowpan@ietf.org>; Mon, 18 Jun 2012 04:42:40 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by vcqp1 with SMTP id p1so2940109vcq.31 for <6lowpan@ietf.org>; Mon, 18 Jun 2012 04:42:40 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=gYbvwFundC/SoI6XzVeacpsERj+T5JDJRmg0y6kgBK0=; b=NffRYqeU0idx6sbhwxhLOYos/5l7hykcX8J9Leta+mMeGdMz27nYox0uiw230szYsH tYyCMV6ewUqKf7sb4aB2W4+3JVqJ18/anbqNnYlg6bROac2EltxwwoNGN3Wn8eBzoVVv NFU2Twx/h/Ql+jFUAuxPJG4Y9d7k8RS//x5dN2yTe09byK5N2sh1Eha68Ekg5ibvb8Ns XBZqecU9cv/qU2M2XvNka5mUwmti+STIVHvBcWynFKeRamc3UiQ8kUCJBo2qwHwfKJz6 NUHoi2COk7Zc/ZfwQLvYYJrTNBgZ1YfHCOzoNRYGveJcj2APbqfXteeXnjCnY/h+3JfH EviA==
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.220.140.193 with SMTP id j1mr7764300vcu.4.1340019759947; Mon, 18 Jun 2012 04:42:39 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.220.211.72 with HTTP; Mon, 18 Jun 2012 04:42:39 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <CAP+sJUdhZPXx9SxcrzSTovG85FuGh2WB=V1faUzyhyFs+Dw8Kg@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAP+sJUdhZPXx9SxcrzSTovG85FuGh2WB=V1faUzyhyFs+Dw8Kg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 18 Jun 2012 13:42:39 +0200
Message-ID: <CADnDZ8_dmpRThfXihRhD8C+T2Xb-AGK50F7517MnKD0YpXq77Q@mail.gmail.com>
From: Abdussalam Baryun <abdussalambaryun@gmail.com>
To: Ines Robles <mariainesrobles@googlemail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Cc: 6lowpan@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [6lowpan] Does the 6lowpan WG want to close?
X-BeenThere: 6lowpan@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Working group discussion for IPv6 over LowPan networks <6lowpan.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/6lowpan>, <mailto:6lowpan-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/6lowpan>
List-Post: <mailto:6lowpan@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:6lowpan-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6lowpan>, <mailto:6lowpan-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 18 Jun 2012 11:42:41 -0000

Hi Ines,

+1

> I am just thinking that  a new  Milestone or Goal  would be:   802.15.7
> (Li-Fi)  +  6lowPAN.
> What do you think about it?

It is an interesting technology, I think an I-D submission for this
and discussions will make things fit. Discussions and submitting new
I-D will continue the active WG :)

AB
==============

On 6/16/12, Ines  Robles <mariainesrobles@googlemail.com> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I am just thinking that  a new  Milestone or Goal  would be:   802.15.7
> (Li-Fi)  +  6lowPAN.
>
> What do you think about it?
>
> Thanks and Regards,
>
> Ines Robles.
>
>
>
>> Hi Carsten,
>>
>> I agree that it was good to complete the tasks and solve the specific
>> issues, and it may be a good reason for close, but I also think the
>> working
>> group can decide if they want to bring more tasks in and continue (I
>> don't
>> see a role in IETF to MUST close WG if completes the specific problems,
>> if I am wrong please refer me to a page reference?), and if they want to
>> solve other problems related to the group purpose. I think that the
>> community drives works/inputs in IETF WGs.
>>
>> IMO, the IESG is only to decide to requests of open or close, after they
>> get an input with reason. I don't think they are prerogative to decide
>> the
>> input and decide the output as well. IMO IESG are prerogative to decide
>> the
>> outcome. The inputs are decided by the WG, and the WG may not decide the
>> outcome-result of such input. So I think if we want to request for
>> continue/close we see the community input for 6Lowpan WG, then if they
>> wanted to continue we input to IESG for their approval, if they want to
>> close then it will be without an input request.
>>
>> There is a possibility that I don't know how the IETF works, but I read
>> the
>> IETF procedures, and see that there is no good reason for close without
>> the
>> WG consensus or input of this issue.
>>
>> Regards
>>
>>
>