[6lowpan] Differences between RFC4944 as distributed by tools.ietf and datatracker.ietf / rfc-editor
Mathieu Goessens <mathieu.goessens@irisa.fr> Fri, 25 March 2011 17:22 UTC
Return-Path: <mathieu.goessens@irisa.fr>
X-Original-To: 6lowpan@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: 6lowpan@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AFEEB3A67ED; Fri, 25 Mar 2011 10:22:39 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -9.799
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-9.799 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.150, BAYES_00=-2.599, HELO_EQ_FR=0.35, J_CHICKENPOX_54=0.6, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id r2ib-hMB0s1K; Fri, 25 Mar 2011 10:22:38 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail4-relais-sop.national.inria.fr (mail4-relais-sop.national.inria.fr [192.134.164.105]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6A9393A67EC; Fri, 25 Mar 2011 10:22:38 -0700 (PDT)
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.63,244,1299452400"; d="scan'208";a="91142936"
Received: from arkintoofle.irisa.fr (HELO [131.254.12.159]) ([131.254.12.159]) by mail4-relais-sop.national.inria.fr with ESMTP; 25 Mar 2011 18:24:12 +0100
Message-ID: <4D8CCFBC.9030909@irisa.fr>
Date: Fri, 25 Mar 2011 18:24:12 +0100
From: Mathieu Goessens <mathieu.goessens@irisa.fr>
Organization: IRISA
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.9.1.16) Gecko/20110307 Iceowl/1.0b1 Icedove/3.0.11
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: 6lowpan@ietf.org, ietf@ietf.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: [6lowpan] Differences between RFC4944 as distributed by tools.ietf and datatracker.ietf / rfc-editor
X-BeenThere: 6lowpan@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Working group discussion for IPv6 over LowPan networks <6lowpan.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6lowpan>, <mailto:6lowpan-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/6lowpan>
List-Post: <mailto:6lowpan@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:6lowpan-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6lowpan>, <mailto:6lowpan-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 25 Mar 2011 17:22:39 -0000
Hi folks, The RFC4944 looks to be different in the version distributed by tools.ietf.org and datatracker.ietf.org / rfc-editor.org. The figure 2 looks truncated on the tools.ietf.org version: http://tools.ietf.org/rfc/rfc4944.txt http://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc4944.txt Do you know what is the problem ? Document generation problem ? Where it should be reported ? Thanks in advance, Regards, -- Mathieu Goessens, IRISA, Campus de Beaulieu, 35042 Rennes cedex, France Tel: +33 (0) 2 99 84 71 00, Fax: +33 (0) 2 99 84 71 71
- Re: [6lowpan] Differences between RFC4944 as dist… Paul Hoffman
- [6lowpan] Differences between RFC4944 as distribu… Mathieu Goessens
- Re: [6lowpan] Differences between RFC4944 as dist… Mathieu Goessens
- Re: [6lowpan] Differences between RFC4944 as dist… Mathieu Goessens
- Re: [6lowpan] Differences between RFC4944 as dist… Adrian Farrel
- Re: [6lowpan] Differences between RFC4944 as dist… Henrik Levkowetz
- Re: [6lowpan] Differences between RFC4944 as dist… RFC Editor