Re: [6lowpan] Does the 6lowpan WG want to close?

+1

AB

On 6/18/12, Jens Toftgaard Petersen <jtp@rtx.dk> wrote:
> In the market space of home automation and security we see a lot of interest
> for our proposed 6LoWPAN over DECT-ULE. In many cases the radio propagation
> characteristics of DECT-ULE MAC complements the other existing MAC/PHY.
> We have working "6LowPan over DECT-ULE" lab prototypes and public show is
> expected within a few month. Silicon has been available for a while. ETSI
> and supporting companies are currently putting a lot of resources in
> standardizing the lower layers of DECT-ULE. The standard will be public this
> year.
> We certainly would like to see the DECT-ULE included as part of the 6LoWPAN
> family and hope that the 6lowpan WG facilitate this.
>
> Best regards,
>   Jens
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: 6lowpan-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:6lowpan-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf
> Of Carsten Bormann
> Sent: 17. juni 2012 01:24
> To: Ines Robles
> Cc:
> Subject: Re: [6lowpan] Does the 6lowpan WG want to close?
>
> On Jun 16, 2012, at 23:28, Ines Robles wrote:
>
>> I am just thinking that  a new  Milestone or Goal  would be:   802.15.7
>> (Li-Fi)  +  6lowPAN.
>
> I haven't seen any document out of 802.15.7 yet, so I don't know how well
> the fit would be.
> Certainly a technology to watch.
>
> Another PHY/MAC lined up is DECT-ULE.
> draft-mariager-6lowpan-v6over-dect-ule-02.txt
>
> Grüße, Carsten
>
> _______________________________________________
> 6lowpan mailing list
> 6lowpan@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6lowpan
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> 6lowpan mailing list
> 6lowpan@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6lowpan
>