Re: [6lowpan] [Roll] draft-bormann-ghc

Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org> Wed, 05 September 2012 08:14 UTC

Return-Path: <cabo@tzi.org>
X-Original-To: 6lowpan@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: 6lowpan@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7EA5121F84CD for <6lowpan@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 5 Sep 2012 01:14:38 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -106.249
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-106.249 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, HELO_EQ_DE=0.35, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 8ioI1knPoxX5 for <6lowpan@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 5 Sep 2012 01:14:38 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from informatik.uni-bremen.de (mailhost.informatik.uni-bremen.de [134.102.201.18]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5E31421F844D for <6lowpan@ietf.org>; Wed, 5 Sep 2012 01:14:35 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at informatik.uni-bremen.de
Received: from smtp-fb3.informatik.uni-bremen.de (smtp-fb3.informatik.uni-bremen.de [134.102.224.120]) by informatik.uni-bremen.de (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id q858DmSe013325; Wed, 5 Sep 2012 10:13:48 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (zoo.informatik.uni-bremen.de [134.102.218.16]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp-fb3.informatik.uni-bremen.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 11220D71; Wed, 5 Sep 2012 10:13:48 +0200 (CEST)
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 6.0 \(1486\))
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
From: Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org>
In-Reply-To: <504707DF.4090504@toshiba.co.jp>
Date: Wed, 5 Sep 2012 10:13:48 +0200
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <4AD1F4B9-4CBB-4A7A-927B-B99D67A3AE2E@tzi.org>
References: <18113.1339529290@marajade.sandelman.ca> <FA27D934-E3D9-4D1D-A110-DE7B47F82B2A@yahoo.fr> <CABONVQb5G=9RhpStqa-E6ohz1SLUsxAhvVytBN7emvXXjLU8hA@mail.gmail.com> <87AC724B-DC1F-41C2-9F1F-4357FA7B45A3@tzi.org> <31218.1345834358@sandelman.ca> <94E510D0-CFD3-45D5-BB4B-081A27D6AA4E@tzi.org> <5046E036.1070704@toshiba.co.jp> <4DF53A33-9BAE-4344-8108-4F789D54CCA6@tzi.org> <504707DF.4090504@toshiba.co.jp>
To: Yoshihiro Ohba <yoshihiro.ohba@toshiba.co.jp>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1486)
Cc: 6lowpan@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [6lowpan] [Roll] draft-bormann-ghc
X-BeenThere: 6lowpan@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Working group discussion for IPv6 over LowPan networks <6lowpan.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/6lowpan>, <mailto:6lowpan-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/6lowpan>
List-Post: <mailto:6lowpan@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:6lowpan-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6lowpan>, <mailto:6lowpan-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 05 Sep 2012 08:14:38 -0000

On Sep 5, 2012, at 10:05, Yoshihiro Ohba <yoshihiro.ohba@toshiba.co.jp> wrote:

> Why do you think the *** style is less clear?

because 11nnnkkk turns into 11****** -- this loses visual access to the bit allocation.

Again, this is all about the exposition, not about the technical content of the proposal, so I'm not sure we need good consensus on what is the best style (we only need to make sure there is no potential for misinterpretation).

Grüße, Carsten