Re: [6lowpan] [Roll] draft-bormann-ghc

It would be appreciated if someone can answer to my technical review
of GHC draft which I sent to the list:

http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/6lowpan/current/msg03513.html

Thanks,
Yoshihiro Ohba

(2012/08/25 13:58), Carsten Bormann wrote:
> I don't know -- it could be handled as AD sponsored.  I'm confident we'll find a way.
> 
> More interesting is *when* it should go.  I'm in the process of obtaining research results that might improve the performance with DTLS packets a bit (with minimal implementation impact). We could rush GHC before that is complete, wait a couple of months for these results, or even try to get more input.  What is the best timing? We need input from implementers to decide this.
> 
> Sent from Mobile
> 
> On 24.08.2012, at 21:52, Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca> wrote:
> 
>>
>>>>>>> "Carsten" == Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org> writes:
>>     Carsten> Changing to WG chair mode for a moment:
>>
>>     Carsten> The 6LoWPAN WG is alive and well and is in the process of
>>     Carsten> closing its remaining two work items (6LoWPAN-ND, 6LoWPAN
>>     Carsten> for BTLE).
>>
>>     Carsten> However, you are right in that the 6LoWPAN WG no longer takes new work on.
>>     Carsten> The chairs, with the ADs and the chairs of other WGs, will
>>     Carsten> ensure that interesting work finds an appropriate home.
>>
>> ...? where will GHC go?
>>
>> -- 
>> Michael Richardson
>> -at the cottage-
>> _______________________________________________
>> 6lowpan mailing list
>> 6lowpan@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6lowpan
> _______________________________________________
> 6lowpan mailing list
> 6lowpan@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6lowpan
> 