IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [6lowpan] WG adoption of draft-patil-6lowpan-v6over-btle-01.txt

C Chauvenet <c.chauvenet@watteco.com> Wed, 06 April 2011 08:45 UTC

Return-Path: <c.chauvenet@watteco.com>
X-Original-To: 6lowpan@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: 6lowpan@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BC96728C0E7 for <6lowpan@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 6 Apr 2011 01:45:24 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -5.589
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.589 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=1.010, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id VMlZMjUwhYvL for <6lowpan@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 6 Apr 2011 01:45:24 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from TX2EHSOBE001.bigfish.com (tx2ehsobe001.messaging.microsoft.com [65.55.88.11]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E59F73A681D for <6lowpan@ietf.org>; Wed, 6 Apr 2011 01:45:23 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail24-tx2-R.bigfish.com (10.9.14.246) by TX2EHSOBE001.bigfish.com (10.9.40.21) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.1.225.8; Wed, 6 Apr 2011 08:47:06 +0000
Received: from mail24-tx2 (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by mail24-tx2-R.bigfish.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 55EEF132055B; Wed, 6 Apr 2011 08:47:06 +0000 (UTC)
X-SpamScore: -90
X-BigFish: VPS-90(zz1418M15caKJ1453M98dK14ffOzz1202hzz1033IL8275dhz2dh2a8h668h839h61h)
X-Spam-TCS-SCL: 0:0
X-Forefront-Antispam-Report: KIP:(null); UIP:(null); IPVD:NLI; H:IE2RD2HUB007.red002.local; RD:none; EFVD:NLI
Received: from mail24-tx2 (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by mail24-tx2 (MessageSwitch) id 130207961022529_909; Wed, 6 Apr 2011 08:46:50 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from TX2EHSMHS031.bigfish.com (unknown [10.9.14.252]) by mail24-tx2.bigfish.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5882913100C5; Wed, 6 Apr 2011 08:45:43 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from IE2RD2HUB007.red002.local (213.199.187.153) by TX2EHSMHS031.bigfish.com (10.9.99.131) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.1.225.8; Wed, 6 Apr 2011 08:45:39 +0000
Received: from IE2RD2XVS211.red002.local ([172.18.6.54]) by IE2RD2HUB007.red002.local ([10.33.16.155]) with mapi; Wed, 6 Apr 2011 01:45:05 -0700
From: C Chauvenet <c.chauvenet@watteco.com>
To: Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org>, Oliver Hahm <oliver.hahm@fu-berlin.de>
Date: Wed, 06 Apr 2011 01:45:02 -0700
Thread-Topic: [6lowpan] WG adoption of draft-patil-6lowpan-v6over-btle-01.txt
Thread-Index: AcvzA7eoVQ4Aw3QbQxS0tR+2Sl7PiwBMa0VQ
Message-ID: <BDF612E3788C4C4791A1A49AC3CB7C970B4FB14DC0@IE2RD2XVS211.red002.local>
References: <C9BB1E4D.12A43%basavaraj.patil@nokia.com> <4D95B9DF.3030309@gmail.com> <4D95C1E9.1070901@gridmerge.com> <1301679639.6495.12.camel@Nokia-N900> <13C0FE6D-2E82-4534-BF3A-34CBE7B5A817@tzi.org>
In-Reply-To: <13C0FE6D-2E82-4534-BF3A-34CBE7B5A817@tzi.org>
Accept-Language: fr-FR, en-US
Content-Language: fr-FR
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
acceptlanguage: fr-FR, en-US
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-OriginatorOrg: watteco.com
Cc: "6lowpan@ietf.org" <6lowpan@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [6lowpan] WG adoption of draft-patil-6lowpan-v6over-btle-01.txt
X-BeenThere: 6lowpan@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Working group discussion for IPv6 over LowPan networks <6lowpan.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6lowpan>, <mailto:6lowpan-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/6lowpan>
List-Post: <mailto:6lowpan@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:6lowpan-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6lowpan>, <mailto:6lowpan-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 06 Apr 2011 08:45:24 -0000

Hi All, 

I definitely push the idea of a "generic IPv6 over low power foo" specification (if achievable).
IPv6 may be used over various low power media, and if a generic adaptation layer can be designed, this may avoid to write a specification fo each low power media (exiting and to appear) that use IPv6.
By the way, low power media cannot be restricted to wireless media. We also have to consider wired media (like low power PLC currentlty specified in IEEE P1901.2) as they shared many requirements with well known LoWPAN technologies.

Cédric.

-----Message d'origine-----
De : 6lowpan-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:6lowpan-bounces@ietf.org] De la part de Carsten Bormann
Envoyé : lundi 4 avril 2011 22:05
À : Oliver Hahm
Cc : 6lowpan@ietf.org
Objet : Re: [6lowpan] WG adoption of draft-patil-6lowpan-v6over-btle-01.txt

On Apr 1, 2011, at 19:40, Oliver Hahm wrote:

> Therefore, a more generic specification for IPv6 over low-power wireless foo would be really interesting for us - and probably a lot of other people as CC1020 and CC110x are very popular transceivers for WSN.

I think that is an interesting idea.  How much of such a specification could be generic and how much would need to be specific to each of the radios?  Can you describe the decisions you had to take in applying 6LoWPAN to these radios?

And, even better, can you write a draft?

Gruesse, Carsten

_______________________________________________
6lowpan mailing list
6lowpan@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6lowpan

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email