IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [6lowpan] [ADs] AUTH48 [MF]: RFC 6282 <draft-ietf-6lowpan-hc-15.txt>

Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org> Mon, 08 August 2011 17:43 UTC

Return-Path: <cabo@tzi.org>
X-Original-To: 6lowpan@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: 6lowpan@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9E80621F8B3C for <6lowpan@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 8 Aug 2011 10:43:55 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -106.249
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-106.249 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, HELO_EQ_DE=0.35, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id O+eCxoa6ARJp for <6lowpan@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 8 Aug 2011 10:43:54 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from informatik.uni-bremen.de (mailhost.informatik.uni-bremen.de [IPv6:2001:638:708:30c9::12]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9415821F8B1F for <6lowpan@ietf.org>; Mon, 8 Aug 2011 10:43:54 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at informatik.uni-bremen.de
Received: from smtp-fb3.informatik.uni-bremen.de (smtp-fb3.informatik.uni-bremen.de [134.102.224.120]) by informatik.uni-bremen.de (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id p78HiDp3003505; Mon, 8 Aug 2011 19:44:13 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from [192.168.217.100] (p5B3E65CD.dip.t-dialin.net [91.62.101.205]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp-fb3.informatik.uni-bremen.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 339C7CEA; Mon, 8 Aug 2011 19:44:13 +0200 (CEST)
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1084)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
From: Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org>
In-Reply-To: <DE69914A-2813-4044-AEA7-A716FE2157CE@tzi.org>
Date: Mon, 08 Aug 2011 19:44:12 +0200
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <56748029-05E7-4B09-8C50-C9EADD5629A0@tzi.org>
References: <6A2A459175DABE4BB11DE2026AA50A5D05228480@XMB-AMS-107.cisco.com> <DE69914A-2813-4044-AEA7-A716FE2157CE@tzi.org>
To: 6lowpan WG <6lowpan@ietf.org>, RFC Editor <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1084)
Subject: Re: [6lowpan] [ADs] AUTH48 [MF]: RFC 6282 <draft-ietf-6lowpan-hc-15.txt>
X-BeenThere: 6lowpan@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Working group discussion for IPv6 over LowPan networks <6lowpan.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/6lowpan>, <mailto:6lowpan-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/6lowpan>
List-Post: <mailto:6lowpan@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:6lowpan-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6lowpan>, <mailto:6lowpan-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 08 Aug 2011 17:43:55 -0000

OK, I have reread all the messages, and I'm now ready to declare a (rough) consensus for

	Compression Format for IPv6 Datagrams over IEEE 802.15.4-based Networks

(with an ever so slight edge for the -based, which is different from RFC 4944, but "Datagrams" is different, too).

While there were a number of voices for keeping 6LoWPAN in the title (as in RFC 4919), there did not seem to be consensus for that.

I apologize for holding up this RFC for so long for what is pretty much a bikeshed color issue.

And, yes, I'm slowly getting back to IETF work, and will try to start popping the stack.

Gruesse, Carsten

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email