[6tisch-security] new con-call time until IETF99.

Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca> Thu, 30 March 2017 18:44 UTC

Return-Path: <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
X-Original-To: 6tisch-security@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: 6tisch-security@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1C08C1296BB for <6tisch-security@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 30 Mar 2017 11:44:09 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.902
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.902 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id HTW9mkLJ69gL for <6tisch-security@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 30 Mar 2017 11:44:07 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from tuna.sandelman.ca (tuna.sandelman.ca [IPv6:2607:f0b0:f:3:216:3eff:fe7c:d1f3]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 38127128D8B for <6tisch-security@ietf.org>; Thu, 30 Mar 2017 11:44:06 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from sandelman.ca (obiwan.sandelman.ca []) by tuna.sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id CB892200A3; Thu, 30 Mar 2017 15:08:03 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from obiwan.sandelman.ca (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id F0BE9636BB; Thu, 30 Mar 2017 14:44:04 -0400 (EDT)
From: Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
To: tisch-security <6tisch-security@ietf.org>
CC: Benjamin Damm <bdamm@ssni.com>
In-Reply-To: <1490892227379.87358@ssni.com>
References: <1490892227379.87358@ssni.com>
X-Mailer: MH-E 8.6; nmh 1.6+dev; GNU Emacs 24.5.1
X-Face: $\n1pF)h^`}$H>Hk{L"x@)JS7<%Az}5RyS@k9X%29-lHB$Ti.V>2bi.~ehC0; <'$9xN5Ub# z!G,p`nR&p7Fz@^UXIn156S8.~^@MJ*mMsD7=QFeq%AL4m<nPbLgmtKK-5dC@#:k
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
Date: Thu, 30 Mar 2017 14:44:04 -0400
Message-ID: <22824.1490899444@obiwan.sandelman.ca>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/6tisch-security/31LaHLu6WNgxbNWXSsVsjMZyAZo>
Subject: [6tisch-security] new con-call time until IETF99.
X-BeenThere: 6tisch-security@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: Extended Design Team for 6TiSCH security architecture <6tisch-security.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/6tisch-security>, <mailto:6tisch-security-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/6tisch-security/>
List-Post: <mailto:6tisch-security@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:6tisch-security-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6tisch-security>, <mailto:6tisch-security-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 30 Mar 2017 18:44:09 -0000

We had moved the 6tisch-security call time to the current time in order to
attempt to accomodate some UTF-900 people on the west coast (and the weekday
that they were unavailable), but that hasn't helped.

We started with JITSI, and it was sometimes a problem, and we went back to
webex+etherpad, and when the webrtc version didn't require a .exe download,
it was great.  I'd like to go back to JITSI; the caveat is that there is no
PTSN dialin, only VoIP.

I have shown this the week of April 10, but it would be repeating every
two weeks until the week before IETF99.  Here is the poll:


Please note that in the upper-right, you can set the time zone that is
displays the poll in.  If you login, you can also see the possibilities
on top of your calendar, if you use a compatible ics system.

Please use "If-Need-be" (YES), if you could participate at least
3 out 4 times.  If-Need-Be usually means you'd have to tweak some
other part of your life, but that you'd be willing to do that.

Michael Richardson <mcr+IETF@sandelman.ca>ca>, Sandelman Software Works
 -= IPv6 IoT consulting =-