Re: [6tisch-security] minimal security draft

Mališa Vučinić <malisa.vucinic@inria.fr> Thu, 09 February 2017 13:58 UTC

Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_E44440DB-7262-49D4-9FCA-5F996568EE18"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 9.3 \(3124\))
From: Mališa Vučinić <malisa.vucinic@inria.fr>
In-Reply-To: <22684.27510.499873.955382@fireball.acr.fi>
Date: Thu, 09 Feb 2017 14:58:28 +0100
Message-Id: <44AF5DF7-CA08-403F-ABD1-5E6E07B83797@inria.fr>
References: <1f99708ffbacaa7235d05b535f669291@xs4all.nl> <6D6AE790-1234-403B-9429-992B4E168AF3@inria.fr> <22684.27510.499873.955382@fireball.acr.fi>
To: Tero Kivinen <kivinen@iki.fi>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/6tisch-security/4ewtP888lcTPOF2F7dy2A_e-Kb8>
Cc: 6tisch Security <6tisch-security@ietf.org>, consultancy@vanderstok.org
Subject: Re: [6tisch-security] minimal security draft
Precedence: list

Thanks, Tero. I created an issue in the bitbucket so we will resolve this with the next published version.

For minimal, I propose that we limit the document to either implicit or KeyIndex mode and use the kid parameter of COSE_Key struct to identify the value of the index. If kid is not present -> use implicit mode, if kid is present use it for KeyIndex mode. What do you think?

Mališa

> On 09 Feb 2017, at 14:15, Tero Kivinen <kivinen@iki.fi> wrote:
> 
> You would also need to have 802.15.4 specific key identification
> information, i.e. the KeyIdMode, KeyIndex (if KeyIdMode is not 0) and
> KeySource (if KeyIdMode is 2 or 3).

[6tisch-security] minimal security draft peter van der Stok
Re: [6tisch-security] minimal security draft Mališa Vučinić
Re: [6tisch-security] minimal security draft Tero Kivinen
Re: [6tisch-security] minimal security draft Mališa Vučinić
Re: [6tisch-security] minimal security draft peter van der Stok
Re: [6tisch-security] minimal security draft Mališa Vučinić