[6tisch-security] minimal security draft
peter van der Stok <stokcons@xs4all.nl> Thu, 09 February 2017 09:06 UTC
Return-Path: <stokcons@xs4all.nl>
X-Original-To: 6tisch-security@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: 6tisch-security@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 810DB1294AC for <6tisch-security@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 9 Feb 2017 01:06:16 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.62
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.62 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id zs0cUWO8UbYw for <6tisch-security@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 9 Feb 2017 01:06:15 -0800 (PST)
Received: from lb3-smtp-cloud3.xs4all.net (lb3-smtp-cloud3.xs4all.net [194.109.24.30]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B0EDD128E18 for <6tisch-security@ietf.org>; Thu, 9 Feb 2017 01:06:14 -0800 (PST)
Received: from webmail.xs4all.nl ([IPv6:2001:888:0:22:194:109:20:216]) by smtp-cloud3.xs4all.net with ESMTP id iZ6C1u00H25pRQy01Z6CV5; Thu, 09 Feb 2017 10:06:12 +0100
Received: from AMontpellier-654-1-241-185.w92-133.abo.wanadoo.fr ([92.133.12.185]) by webmail.xs4all.nl with HTTP (HTTP/1.1 POST); Thu, 09 Feb 2017 10:06:12 +0100
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Date: Thu, 09 Feb 2017 10:06:12 +0100
From: peter van der Stok <stokcons@xs4all.nl>
To: 6tisch Security <6tisch-security@ietf.org>
Organization: vanderstok consultancy
Mail-Reply-To: consultancy@vanderstok.org
Message-ID: <1f99708ffbacaa7235d05b535f669291@xs4all.nl>
X-Sender: stokcons@xs4all.nl
User-Agent: XS4ALL Webmail
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/6tisch-security/SGLgJAW8mVbs7rBTZ0rB3nr5SlA>
Subject: [6tisch-security] minimal security draft
X-BeenThere: 6tisch-security@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
Reply-To: consultancy@vanderstok.org
List-Id: Extended Design Team for 6TiSCH security architecture <6tisch-security.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/6tisch-security>, <mailto:6tisch-security-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/6tisch-security/>
List-Post: <mailto:6tisch-security@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:6tisch-security-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6tisch-security>, <mailto:6tisch-security-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 09 Feb 2017 09:06:16 -0000
Dear authors, For the transport of the link-layer keys have you thought about using a specific format? Will you specify a content-format in the CoAP registry? We should like to use that content format also in the est-coaps draft. If you do, will it be possible to use CBOR and specifically binary arrays? Greetings, Peter -- Peter van der Stok vanderstok consultancy mailto: consultancy@vanderstok.org www: www.vanderstok.org tel NL: +31(0)492474673 F: +33(0)966015248
- [6tisch-security] minimal security draft peter van der Stok
- Re: [6tisch-security] minimal security draft Mališa Vučinić
- Re: [6tisch-security] minimal security draft Tero Kivinen
- Re: [6tisch-security] minimal security draft Mališa Vučinić
- Re: [6tisch-security] minimal security draft peter van der Stok
- Re: [6tisch-security] minimal security draft Mališa Vučinić