Re: [6tisch] [6TiSCH] Node Behavior at Boot in SF0
"Prof. Diego Dujovne" <diego.dujovne@mail.udp.cl> Wed, 16 November 2016 15:02 UTC
Return-Path: <diego.dujovne@mail.udp.cl>
X-Original-To: 6tisch@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: 6tisch@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 40F5F1295BB for <6tisch@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 16 Nov 2016 07:02:29 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=mail-udp-cl.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Osh4kOvQoDJI for <6tisch@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 16 Nov 2016 07:02:27 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-wm0-x236.google.com (mail-wm0-x236.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c09::236]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AA6A012940A for <6tisch@ietf.org>; Wed, 16 Nov 2016 07:02:26 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-wm0-x236.google.com with SMTP id g23so245259567wme.1 for <6tisch@ietf.org>; Wed, 16 Nov 2016 07:02:26 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=mail-udp-cl.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=ccYZw5Ac9eCA2PEfA27BFl8G/zkkXSlma1emoTJWkyw=; b=SGKKklKJlQDIXG7lvJBh4sCpP0mo6nxG7k94wLCZW84/9tyrcFKiCqEE2D7QyJJXj3 QTVeDLyJY2RiRKLE8XsBFBHUITbowDW2FwZAqtt0w7E91e+DlbZcTkESVb0F1GkoHTp+ mlNTFk7VaGzwGiTLc1FOYuTBSVIV+jYKUx8OyiuXGm5VT3BLiPuTX0vu3Ds5TzSto5am 2omDpRnyj+jOvlk3ClFFsCS1LvP3yBI/pJ/bqeBEreayiZP3J+GxDK3BJcCRPA6x4veZ pXdqbiLaytmnMG3rixi5XlamgEx8O+QyUR5LwyqnoZ/4I9aIHzb7s7B6WVA+8b7B2dRC 53cg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=ccYZw5Ac9eCA2PEfA27BFl8G/zkkXSlma1emoTJWkyw=; b=YCuOWRVxZhfFBG/tP6YEY5PcgBFF/78oV/KI8cueDoYW4zfsPoJqK/xnZimvptepCi 51Ofe3ackhgsRxXWCFAYuX0nOr2yihk+3c8KDRhrJXUGmvFIdbEh0Wr1Swb4l8aC1NRU 2crbukm+Y7/E9J+6+t8U5+0ni8GnW/mOR/7fWu8bc1VI4MIRNRyPcmJSKEcmPASfSsKz KKPGit0+eTAgPDE6vsnnEQYXG00dYFjRrWlDE+P2HaP6A5zbg8iuAU5ulSg5Z80Tteed 58nkm5nwWRTr/GeuwDUdT3WouEQiy+XYkLyySSVDJ0VTalKLREhs5mHOSJzUa6kAhWZc 1BVg==
X-Gm-Message-State: ABUngvez2D3Lqij3VcU4Qi9v2vwQuaKOms3nGsqYZDJU17ciloDf5Ri3YVU7dnMFFaLn/r9y1AkKquy4DsqFEw==
X-Received: by 10.28.96.4 with SMTP id u4mr11349277wmb.86.1479308545073; Wed, 16 Nov 2016 07:02:25 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.28.134.135 with HTTP; Wed, 16 Nov 2016 07:02:04 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <CADJ9OA8bVu=R+BGaesTZMnziAugs2gx80x15qsWeFeD=wpKepw@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAAdgstS-_CszQZ-0aDf3sOrj4kuJ1MU6HR2Z97OoiecrPkSGdw@mail.gmail.com> <6f8fff17-2238-8470-7109-9a44b874eb00@toshiba.co.jp> <CADJ9OA8bVu=R+BGaesTZMnziAugs2gx80x15qsWeFeD=wpKepw@mail.gmail.com>
From: "Prof. Diego Dujovne" <diego.dujovne@mail.udp.cl>
Date: Wed, 16 Nov 2016 12:02:04 -0300
Message-ID: <CAH7SZV84FhvZRMkLiStOZnVe+8RaP3aPA+QnRbQQnmSNLt4ttg@mail.gmail.com>
To: Thomas Watteyne <thomas.watteyne@inria.fr>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a1148e99857b62d05416c5ca9"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/6tisch/2m0VXFJOKughhWkLspXnC8hryfE>
Cc: Yasuyuki Tanaka <yasuyuki9.tanaka@toshiba.co.jp>, "6tisch@ietf.org" <6tisch@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [6tisch] [6TiSCH] Node Behavior at Boot in SF0
X-BeenThere: 6tisch@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Discuss link layer model for Deterministic IPv6 over the TSCH mode of IEEE 802.15.4e, and impacts on RPL and 6LoWPAN such as resource allocation" <6tisch.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/6tisch>, <mailto:6tisch-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/6tisch/>
List-Post: <mailto:6tisch@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:6tisch-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6tisch>, <mailto:6tisch-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 16 Nov 2016 15:02:29 -0000
Yasuyuki, Thomas, I suggest to keep the CLEAR command after reboot/failure. Regards, Diego 2016-11-16 11:05 GMT-03:00 Thomas Watteyne <thomas.watteyne@inria.fr>: > @Tengfei, > Does that suggestion work for you or should we create an issue on SF0? > Thomas > > On Fri, Nov 11, 2016 at 8:50 PM, Yasuyuki Tanaka < > yasuyuki9.tanaka@toshiba.co.jp> wrote: > >> Hi Tengfei, >> >> I think an assumption there is that a node has no state with its >> neighbors just after booting up or restarting. On the other hand, a >> neighbor of them may have cells allocated for the node. To resolve >> such a possible inconsistency, the node issues CLEAR to each of its >> neighbors. >> >> Best, >> Yatch >> >> On 2016/11/02 15:29, Tengfei Chang wrote: >> >>> All, >>> >>> For the decision when a node is restarted, the SF0 says: >>> >>> In order to define a known state after the node is restarted, a CLEAR >>> command is issued to each of the neighbor nodes to enable a new >>> allocation process. The 6P Initial Timeout Value provided by SF0 >>> should allow for the maximum number of TSCH link-layer retries, as >>> defined by Section 4.3.4 of [I-D.ietf-6tisch-6top-protocol < >>> https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-6tisch-6top-sf0-02#r >>> ef-I-D.ietf-6tisch-6top-protocol>]. TODO/ >>> REMARK: The initial timeout is currently under discussion. >>> >>> >>> A little suggestion is DO NOT issue a clear command to previous parent >>> until the nodes has reserved new cells to its new parent. This is to avoid >>> the swing if the reservation failed to its new parent and changed back to >>> previous parent. >>> >>> What do you think? >>> >>> Tengfei >>> >>> -- >>> Chang Tengfei, >>> Pre-Postdoctoral Research Engineer, Inria >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> 6tisch mailing list >>> 6tisch@ietf.org >>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6tisch >>> >>> >> _______________________________________________ >> 6tisch mailing list >> 6tisch@ietf.org >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6tisch >> > > > > -- > _______________________________________ > > Thomas Watteyne, PhD > Research Scientist & Innovator, Inria > Sr Networking Design Eng, Linear Tech > Founder & co-lead, UC Berkeley OpenWSN > Co-chair, IETF 6TiSCH > > www.thomaswatteyne.com > _______________________________________ > > _______________________________________________ > 6tisch mailing list > 6tisch@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6tisch > > -- DIEGO DUJOVNE Profesor Asociado Escuela de Informática y Telecomunicaciones Facultad de IngenierÃa - Universidad Diego Portales - Chile www.ingenieria.udp.cl (56 2) 676 8125
- [6tisch] [6TiSCH] Node Behavior at Boot in SF0 Tengfei Chang
- Re: [6tisch] [6TiSCH] Node Behavior at Boot in SF0 Yasuyuki Tanaka
- Re: [6tisch] [6TiSCH] Node Behavior at Boot in SF0 Thomas Watteyne
- Re: [6tisch] [6TiSCH] Node Behavior at Boot in SF0 Tengfei Chang
- Re: [6tisch] [6TiSCH] Node Behavior at Boot in SF0 Prof. Diego Dujovne
- Re: [6tisch] [6TiSCH] Node Behavior at Boot in SF0 Thomas Watteyne
- Re: [6tisch] [6TiSCH] Node Behavior at Boot in SF0 Prof. Diego Dujovne
- Re: [6tisch] [6TiSCH] Node Behavior at Boot in SF0 Thomas Watteyne
- Re: [6tisch] [6TiSCH] Node Behavior at Boot in SF0 Yasuyuki Tanaka
- Re: [6tisch] [6TiSCH] Node Behavior at Boot in SF0 Thomas Watteyne
- Re: [6tisch] [6TiSCH] Node Behavior at Boot in SF0 Yasuyuki Tanaka
- Re: [6tisch] [6TiSCH] Node Behavior at Boot in SF0 Thomas Watteyne
- Re: [6tisch] [6TiSCH] Node Behavior at Boot in SF0 Prof. Diego Dujovne
- Re: [6tisch] [6TiSCH] Node Behavior at Boot in SF0 Yasuyuki Tanaka
- Re: [6tisch] [6TiSCH] Node Behavior at Boot in SF0 Yasuyuki Tanaka
- Re: [6tisch] [6TiSCH] Node Behavior at Boot in SF0 Michael Richardson
- Re: [6tisch] [6TiSCH] Node Behavior at Boot in SF0 Thomas Watteyne