Re: [6tisch] for the Plugtest: New Version Notification for draft-ietf-6lo-routing-dispatch-04.txt

"S.V.R.Anand" <anand@ece.iisc.ernet.in> Sun, 24 January 2016 16:57 UTC

Return-Path: <anand@ece.iisc.ernet.in>
X-Original-To: 6tisch@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: 6tisch@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 23C231A1BA2 for <6tisch@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 24 Jan 2016 08:57:18 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.907
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.907 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RELAY_IS_203=0.994, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id FqibR9aZXjmD for <6tisch@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 24 Jan 2016 08:57:16 -0800 (PST)
Received: from relay.iisc.ernet.in (relay.iisc.ernet.in [203.200.35.70]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 9A1201A1B98 for <6tisch@ietf.org>; Sun, 24 Jan 2016 08:57:15 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ece.iisc.ernet.in (ece.iisc.ernet.in [10.32.1.10]) by relay.iisc.ernet.in (Postfix) with ESMTP id 25DFDAE0476; Sun, 24 Jan 2016 22:27:27 +0530 (IST)
Received: from [10.3.1.148] ([10.3.1.148]) by ece.iisc.ernet.in (8.14.7/8.14.7) with ESMTP id u0OGxAYD012771; Sun, 24 Jan 2016 22:29:10 +0530
To: "Pascal Thubert (pthubert)" <pthubert@cisco.com>, "6tisch@ietf.org" <6tisch@ietf.org>
References: <767aa1dde264436482388a21fd96b318@XCH-RCD-001.cisco.com>
From: "S.V.R.Anand" <anand@ece.iisc.ernet.in>
Message-ID: <56A5025B.5030504@ece.iisc.ernet.in>
Date: Sun, 24 Jan 2016 22:26:59 +0530
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.3.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <767aa1dde264436482388a21fd96b318@XCH-RCD-001.cisco.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------060109050608000307040607"
X-IISc-MailScanner-Information: Please contact nethelp@serc.iisc.in for more information
X-IISc-MailScanner-ID: 25DFDAE0476.A9830
X-IISc-MailScanner: Found to be clean
X-IISc-MailScanner-SpamCheck: not spam, SpamAssassin (not cached, score=-0.889, required 6.5, ALL_TRUSTED -1.00, BAYES_00 -1.90, HTML_MESSAGE 0.00, NO_RDNS2 0.01, RP_MATCHES_RCVD -0.00, URIBL_BLOCKED 0.00, WINDOWS_7BITS 2.00)
X-IISc-MailScanner-From: anand@ece.iisc.ernet.in
MailScanner-NULL-Check: 1454259448.70233@kuyRc89q2HSTHy1ASmIWTA
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/6tisch/5DJoOyyiK6Qxej1DROIRjBZTDwI>
Subject: Re: [6tisch] for the Plugtest: New Version Notification for draft-ietf-6lo-routing-dispatch-04.txt
X-BeenThere: 6tisch@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Discuss link layer model for Deterministic IPv6 over the TSCH mode of IEEE 802.15.4e, and impacts on RPL and 6LoWPAN such as resource allocation" <6tisch.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/6tisch>, <mailto:6tisch-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/6tisch/>
List-Post: <mailto:6tisch@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:6tisch-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6tisch>, <mailto:6tisch-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 24 Jan 2016 16:57:18 -0000

Hi Pascal,

Thanks a lot for keeping the discussion topics open. I am absolutely 
fine with your
suggestion of having the draft as it is for the plugtest.

Anand

On Saturday 23 January 2016 05:48 PM, Pascal Thubert (pthubert) wrote:
>  > Dear all: > > > > I uploaded the changes made after the discussions 
on the 6lo ML and conformed at the interim Friday. > > There are 2 
discussions left open, for a better compression of the RH when the 
boundary is not a power of 2 (Simon) and whether we should refrain from 
consuming the addresses of the RH as we go (Simon and Anand). For both, 
there is an active ticket at 6lo: > > > > #14: More optimal compression 
of 6LoRH > > #11: RH3 6LoRH not recoverable > > > > For the plugtest, 
though, I suggest we live with what we have, 
draft-ietf-6lo-routing-dispatch-04.txt and 
draft-ietf-6lo-paging-dispatch-01.txt. > > > > Note: With this spec an 
example of  Downward Packet In Non-Storing Mode will be: > > > > 
+-+-+-+-+-+-+- ... +-+-+- ... -+-+-- ... -+-+- ... -+-+-+-+-+ ... +-... 
 > > |11110001 |RH3-6LoRH | RPI-6LoRH | IP-in-IP | NH=1 |11110CPP| UDP | 
UDP > > |Page 1   |Type1 S=2 |           |  6LoRH   | IPHC | UDP    | 
hdr |load > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+- ... +-+-+- ... -+-+-- ... -+-+- ... 
-+-+-+-+-+ ... +-... > >             <-8bytes->                         
<-  RFC 6282      -> > >                                                 
No RPL artifact > > > >               Figure 20: Example Compressed 
Packet with RH3. > > > > Are we OK? > > > > Pascal > > > > -----Original 
Message----- > > From: internet-drafts@ietf.org 
[mailto:internet-drafts@ietf.org] > > Sent: samedi 23 janvier 2016 13:07 
 > > To: Robert Cragie <robert.cragie@gridmerge.com>om>; Pascal Thubert 
(pthubert) <pthubert@cisco.com>om>; Dr. Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org>rg>; 
Laurent Toutain <laurent.toutain@telecom-bretagne.eu>eu>; Carsten Bormann 
<cabo@tzi.org>rg>; Laurent Toutain <Laurent.Toutain@telecom-bretagne.eu> > 
 > Subject: New Version Notification for 
draft-ietf-6lo-routing-dispatch-04.txt > > > > > > A new version of I-D, 
draft-ietf-6lo-routing-dispatch-04.txt > > has been successfully 
submitted by Pascal Thubert and posted to the IETF repository. > > > > 
Name:                  draft-ietf-6lo-routing-dispatch > > 
Revision:              04 > > Title:                     6LoWPAN Routing 
Header > > Document date: 2016-01-23 > > Group:                  6lo > > 
Pages:                  31 > > URL:            
https://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-6lo-routing-dispatch-04.txt 
 > > Status:         
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-6lo-routing-dispatch/ > > 
Htmlized:       
https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-6lo-routing-dispatch-04 > > 
Diff:           
https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-6lo-routing-dispatch-04 > > 
 > > Abstract: > >    This specification introduces a new 6LoWPAN 
dispatch type for use in > >    6LoWPAN Route-Over topologies, that 
initially covers the needs of RPL > >    (RFC6550) data packets 
compression.  Using this dispatch type, this > >    specification 
defines a method to compress RPL Option (RFC6553) > >    information and 
Routing Header type 3 (RFC6554), an efficient IP-in- > >    IP technique 
and is extensible for more applications. > > > > > > > > > > Please note 
that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of submission until 
the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org. > > > > 
The IETF Secretariat > > > > -- > This message has been scanned for 
viruses and > dangerous content by MailScanner, and is > believed to be 
clean. > > _______________________________________________ > 6tisch 
mailing list > 6tisch@ietf.org > 
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6tisch