Return-Path: X-Original-To: 6tisch@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: 6tisch@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 526931B2C24 for <6tisch@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 26 Feb 2016 06:08:39 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -5.933 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.933 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, HELO_EQ_FR=0.35, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.006] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id mcdQ6w-u10MN for <6tisch@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 26 Feb 2016 06:08:36 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail3-relais-sop.national.inria.fr (mail3-relais-sop.national.inria.fr [192.134.164.104]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EFE161B2C28 for <6tisch@ietf.org>; Fri, 26 Feb 2016 06:08:35 -0800 (PST) X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.22,498,1449529200"; d="scan'208,217";a="166089487" Received: from mail-wm0-f51.google.com ([74.125.82.51]) by mail3-relais-sop.national.inria.fr with ESMTP/TLS/AES128-GCM-SHA256; 26 Feb 2016 15:08:19 +0100 Received: by mail-wm0-f51.google.com with SMTP id a4so71421625wme.1 for <6tisch@ietf.org>; Fri, 26 Feb 2016 06:08:19 -0800 (PST) X-Gm-Message-State: AD7BkJJPT43FNEYI8tBcYPXmEPXr2vQ7XnZhlhgkJ/V27DIP+rMNWeeXEdY06JEYt9XbbDJmpOp61X6n5kXN2Q== X-Received: by 10.28.224.84 with SMTP id x81mr3626541wmg.62.1456495699613; Fri, 26 Feb 2016 06:08:19 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.27.63.196 with HTTP; Fri, 26 Feb 2016 06:07:59 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: From: Thomas Watteyne Date: Fri, 26 Feb 2016 15:07:59 +0100 X-Gmail-Original-Message-ID: Message-ID: To: "Pascal Thubert (pthubert)" Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a114c1846cade14052cacd4a5 Archived-At: Cc: "6tisch@ietf.org" <6tisch@ietf.org>, =?UTF-8?Q?Xavi_Vilajosana_Guill=C3=A9n?= Subject: Re: [6tisch] Quick review on draft 15 X-BeenThere: 6tisch@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: "Discuss link layer model for Deterministic IPv6 over the TSCH mode of IEEE 802.15.4e, and impacts on RPL and 6LoWPAN such as resource allocation" <6tisch.ietf.org> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 26 Feb 2016 14:08:39 -0000 --001a114c1846cade14052cacd4a5 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Authors, I went through the changes between v14 and v15 on the bitbucket repo and agree with the changes made. Thomas On Fri, Feb 26, 2016 at 11:22 AM, Pascal Thubert (pthubert) < pthubert@cisco.com> wrote: > Hello Xavi: > > > > I=E2=80=99m not asking for any change change but editorials. In particula= r I do > not see a need to say that minimal could be disabled. Anything can be > disabled, it=E2=80=99s always an admin decision to implement a protocol. = The > important thing is that minimal does not preclude the use of other TSCH > traffic on other timeslots. > > > > As I reread the draft, I have some editorial suggestions, feel free to > pick or not: > > > > =E2=80=9Cbitmap in the active cell indicate that a node=E2=80=9D -> indic= ates? > > =E2=80=9CThis results in =E2=80=98=E2=80=99Slotted Aloha=E2=80=99=E2=80= =99 behavior=E2=80=9D -> This results in a behavior > that is similar to that of =E2=80=98=E2=80=99Slotted Aloha=E2=80=99=E2=80= =99. > > =E2=80=9Cacknowledgement=E2=80=9D -> acknowledgment > > =E2=80=9Cneighbour=E2=80=9D -> neighbor > > =E2=80=9CEBs MUST NOT be used for time=E2=80=9D -> EBs are not used for t= ime > > =E2=80=9Crank=E2=80=9D -> Rank (when talking about RPL=E2=80=99s Rank) > > =E2=80=9CRouting extension headers such as RPI and SRH and inner > > IP headers MUST be compressed according to [RFC6282], > > [I-D.ietf-6lo-routing-dispatch] and [I-D.ietf-6lo-paging-dispatch].=E2= =80=9D > > -> > > =E2=80=9C > > Routing extension headers such as RPI [RFC6550] and SRH [RFC6554], and > outer > > IP headers in case on encapsulation MUST be compressed according to > > [I-D.ietf-6lo-routing-dispatch] and [I-D.ietf-6lo-paging-dispatch]. > > =E2=80=9C > > > > Also: [I-D.ietf-6lo-routing-dispatch] and [I-D.ietf-6lo-paging-dispatch] > should be normative references. Should not delay minimal if we last call > soon. > > > > Take care, > > > > Pascal > > _______________________________________________ > 6tisch mailing list > 6tisch@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6tisch > > --=20 _______________________________________ Thomas Watteyne, PhD Research Scientist & Innovator, Inria Sr Networking Design Eng, Linear Tech Founder & co-lead, UC Berkeley OpenWSN Co-chair, IETF 6TiSCH www.thomaswatteyne.com _______________________________________ --001a114c1846cade14052cacd4a5 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Authors,
I went through the changes between v14 and v1= 5 on the bitbucket repo and agree with the changes made.
Thomas

On Fri,= Feb 26, 2016 at 11:22 AM, Pascal Thubert (pthubert) <= pthubert@cisco.com<= /a>> wrote:

Hello Xavi:

=C2=A0

I=E2=80=99m not asking for any change= change but editorials. In particular I do not see a need to say that minim= al could be disabled. Anything can be disabled, it=E2=80=99s always an admin decision to implement a protocol. The important thing is that min= imal does not preclude the use of other TSCH traffic on other timeslots.=

=C2=A0

As I reread the draft, I have some ed= itorial suggestions, feel free to pick or not:

=C2=A0

=E2=80=9Cbitmap in the active cell in= dicate that a node=E2=80=9D -> indicates?

=E2=80=9CThis results in =E2=80=98=E2= =80=99Slotted Aloha=E2=80=99=E2=80=99 behavior=E2=80=9D -> This results = in a behavior that is similar to that of =E2=80=98=E2=80=99Slotted Aloha=E2= =80=99=E2=80=99.

=E2=80=9Cacknowledgement=E2=80=9D -&g= t; acknowledgment

=E2=80=9Cneighbour=E2=80=9D -> nei= ghbor

=E2=80=9CEBs MUST NOT be used for tim= e=E2=80=9D -> EBs are not used for time

=E2=80=9Crank=E2=80=9D -> Rank=C2= =A0 (when talking about RPL=E2=80=99s Rank)

=E2=80=9CRouting extension headers su= ch as RPI and SRH and inner

=C2=A0=C2=A0 IP headers MUST be compr= essed according to [RFC6282],

=C2=A0=C2=A0 [I-D.ietf-6lo-routing-di= spatch] and [I-D.ietf-6lo-paging-dispatch].=E2=80=9D

->

=E2=80=9C

Routing extension headers such as RPI= [RFC6550] and SRH [RFC6554], and outer

=C2=A0=C2=A0 IP headers in case on en= capsulation MUST be compressed according to

=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0[I-D.ietf-6lo-routi= ng-dispatch] and [I-D.ietf-6lo-paging-dispatch].

=E2=80=9C

=C2=A0

Also: [I-D.ietf-6lo-routing-dispatch]= and [I-D.ietf-6lo-paging-dispatch] should be normative references. Should = not delay minimal if we last call soon.

=C2=A0

Take care,

=C2=A0

Pascal


_______________________________________________
6tisch mailing list
6tisch@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6tisch




--
_______________= ________________________

Thomas Watteyne, PhD
Research Sci= entist & Innovator, Inria
Sr Networking Design Eng, Linear Tech
Founder & co-lead, UC Berkeley OpenWSN
Co-chair, IETF 6TiSCH
<= br>
_______________________________________
--001a114c1846cade14052cacd4a5--