IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [6tisch] draft-tiloca-6tisch-robust-scheduling-01 --- rekeying permutation key

Mališa Vučinić <malisa.vucinic@inria.fr> Fri, 05 April 2019 21:10 UTC

Return-Path: <malisa.vucinic@inria.fr>
X-Original-To: 6tisch@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: 6tisch@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7FD3612061F; Fri, 5 Apr 2019 14:10:19 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -5.921
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.921 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, FROM_EXCESS_BASE64=0.979, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id MUo1MMktluK2; Fri, 5 Apr 2019 14:10:18 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail2-relais-roc.national.inria.fr (mail2-relais-roc.national.inria.fr [192.134.164.83]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 49D2D120167; Fri, 5 Apr 2019 14:10:17 -0700 (PDT)
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.60,313,1549926000"; d="scan'208";a="377436729"
Received: from unknown (HELO [192.168.1.138]) ([79.143.111.171]) by mail2-relais-roc.national.inria.fr with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 05 Apr 2019 23:10:16 +0200
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 12.2 \(3445.102.3\))
From: Mališa Vučinić <malisa.vucinic@inria.fr>
In-Reply-To: <31163.1554488119@localhost>
Date: Fri, 05 Apr 2019 23:10:16 +0200
Cc: Marco Tiloca <marco.tiloca@ri.se>, 6tisch <6tisch@ietf.org>, draft-tiloca-6tisch-robust-scheduling@ietf.org
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <31107CBF-3BD5-4466-B837-F9F837340C68@inria.fr>
References: <5427.1554253601@localhost> <6ec51921-6dd6-78d4-9b5d-bde9ad40b35c@ri.se> <8081.1554386670@localhost> <B222C2F7-084F-4CBA-A55D-720619058D38@inria.fr> <10538.1554392453@localhost> <5B3CDDA6-E057-4486-B2C2-3BD9E369F6D9@inria.fr> <31163.1554488119@localhost>
To: Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.102.3)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/6tisch/5W-gyDsVo4txSTA1Dn-6HOH3VBg>
Subject: Re: [6tisch] draft-tiloca-6tisch-robust-scheduling-01 --- rekeying permutation key
X-BeenThere: 6tisch@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Discuss link layer model for Deterministic IPv6 over the TSCH mode of IEEE 802.15.4e, and impacts on RPL and 6LoWPAN such as resource allocation" <6tisch.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/6tisch>, <mailto:6tisch-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/6tisch/>
List-Post: <mailto:6tisch@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:6tisch-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6tisch>, <mailto:6tisch-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 05 Apr 2019 21:10:32 -0000

> On 5 Apr 2019, at 20:15, Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca> wrote:
> 
> If we could delay the switch to the new schedule until *after*
> COJP_REKEYING_GUARD_TIME has elapsed, then that might work.
> Alternatively, if we could number the rekeys then a EB could signal the
> switch to the new schedule some time after the keys are changed.

Not sure about that the exact switch after COJP_REKEYING_GUARD_TIME would work, different nodes receive the new keys at different instants so it would be hard to sync them. I like better the trigger with an EB, it originates at 6LBR that is trusted and the frame can be authenticated by the nodes that have installed the new keys.

Mališa

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email