Re: [6tisch] Typeof sixtop subIE:short or long
Tengfei Chang <tengfei.chang@gmail.com> Fri, 08 January 2016 16:56 UTC
Return-Path: <tengfei.chang@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: 6tisch@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: 6tisch@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AC9511B2A53 for <6tisch@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 8 Jan 2016 08:56:15 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.399
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.399 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, J_CHICKENPOX_55=0.6, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id re_BvllS2SCQ for <6tisch@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 8 Jan 2016 08:56:14 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-yk0-x22c.google.com (mail-yk0-x22c.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4002:c07::22c]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 148061B2A50 for <6tisch@ietf.org>; Fri, 8 Jan 2016 08:56:14 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-yk0-x22c.google.com with SMTP id v14so275105468ykd.3 for <6tisch@ietf.org>; Fri, 08 Jan 2016 08:56:14 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=EjCVjnK+Frrkc/YDYPbr7TGu9C51OborXAEXSoLAgQY=; b=r1yEW+DbIF8BY+66q2FRb3tLgaMm4uCs/Wr+ECcw/3SNa8NpWUK7mQsybyVTA1iwHk hZQhaXEM7aVkCfpmhNFIIb1WRPzWKPhjHvhI0tMhCzvUKsa6xX2catgfhdOOLX3pRaIL 7tCvVPf8j4yVfpQBZjQ81h7oSH30DvUK3+LOc0ZIEHNozbkqlOymKhXpTRUBzhcxei32 nx1xlxwulPjMParqjCtbPv5jeUdZ7fJCbfvssAgqy9rulna/mAx2+JME+wIGedvSXAve f4k7s965/ndxZ3bvMVxFDGxOGFmDcgYv5AADzkWxP7NybtZPB+pueWWMA1L6W46ja7wu Px5A==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.129.92.11 with SMTP id q11mr8709975ywb.34.1452272173354; Fri, 08 Jan 2016 08:56:13 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.37.201.5 with HTTP; Fri, 8 Jan 2016 08:56:13 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <36332723-EE88-4FAC-92F1-61B6A573CBC6@kinneyconsultingllc.com>
References: <CAAdgstRof3hn0=RRQdrpezPq930pHpKu5_qObZGkW9TdceD2KQ@mail.gmail.com> <36332723-EE88-4FAC-92F1-61B6A573CBC6@kinneyconsultingllc.com>
Date: Fri, 08 Jan 2016 17:56:13 +0100
Message-ID: <CAAdgstSPZ3yRjvOPD6q73h_7rpdhHEWu1TJmi+SbHVhE4rY91g@mail.gmail.com>
From: Tengfei Chang <tengfei.chang@gmail.com>
To: "pat.kinney@kinneyconsultingllc.com" <pat.kinney@kinneyconsultingllc.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a114d98540296210528d57705"
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/6tisch/6DYcGDMGH-MrbnBZ34Zs6sxfGfY>
Cc: 6tisch <6tisch@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [6tisch] Typeof sixtop subIE:short or long
X-BeenThere: 6tisch@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Discuss link layer model for Deterministic IPv6 over the TSCH mode of IEEE 802.15.4e, and impacts on RPL and 6LoWPAN such as resource allocation" <6tisch.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/6tisch>, <mailto:6tisch-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/6tisch/>
List-Post: <mailto:6tisch@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:6tisch-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6tisch>, <mailto:6tisch-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 08 Jan 2016 16:56:15 -0000
I see. Thanks a lot Pat for the information! I found the document you mentioned. I will update the format in the Golden Images. Have a good day! Tengfei On Fri, Jan 8, 2016 at 5:25 PM, pat.kinney@kinneyconsultingllc.com < pat.kinney@kinneyconsultingllc.com> wrote: > Tengfei; > > The IEEE 802.15 IG 6T recommended a format for sub-IEs in document > 15-15-0939-02 sent to this reflector on 30 November 2015. The following is > an excerpt from that document: > > "Accordingly, the IEEE 802.15 IG 6T recommends that the IETF use an > alternate scheme that restricts each Payload IE to only one sub-type ID and > content, i.e. no nesting. The advantages of this recommended scheme is > that it eliminates one octet from the total Payload IE, it allows a full > 256 sub-type IDs, and each sub-type length can be up to 2046 octets.” > > Therefore, if 6tisch adopts the above recommendation, there would be no > long or short types. > > Pat > > Pat Kinney > *Kinney Consulting LLC* > IEEE 802.15 WG vice chair, SC chair > ISA100 co-chair, ISA100.20 chair > O: +1.847.960.3715 > pat.kinney@kinneyconsultingllc.com > > On 8, Jan2016, at 10:14, Tengfei Chang <tengfei.chang@gmail.com> wrote: > > Hello all, > > As I mentioned on the Call, the 6top sublayer draft seems didn't define > the type of subIE used by 6P command ,long or short type? Let me know if I > missed it from the draft! Thanks you! > > Regard, > Tengfei > _______________________________________________ > 6tisch mailing list > 6tisch@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6tisch > > > > > > > >
- Re: [6tisch] Typeof sixtop subIE:short or long Tengfei Chang
- [6tisch] Typeof sixtop subIE:short or long Tengfei Chang
- Re: [6tisch] Typeof sixtop subIE:short or long pat.kinney@kinneyconsultingllc.com
- Re: [6tisch] Typeof sixtop subIE:short or long Tengfei Chang
- Re: [6tisch] Typeof sixtop subIE:short or long pat.kinney@kinneyconsultingllc.com
- Re: [6tisch] Typeof sixtop subIE:short or long Qin Wang
- Re: [6tisch] Typeof sixtop subIE:short or long Tengfei Chang
- Re: [6tisch] Typeof sixtop subIE:short or long Tengfei Chang
- Re: [6tisch] Typeof sixtop subIE:short or long pat.kinney@kinneyconsultingllc.com
- Re: [6tisch] Typeof sixtop subIE:short or long Tengfei Chang