IETF Logo Mail Archive

[6tisch] (procedural) Re: [6tisch-security] proposed security text for architecture draft

Rene Struik <rstruik.ext@gmail.com> Wed, 12 November 2014 23:39 UTC

Return-Path: <rstruik.ext@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: 6tisch@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: 6tisch@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 864DC1A1B60; Wed, 12 Nov 2014 15:39:04 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id xW4aXUgyT6mf; Wed, 12 Nov 2014 15:39:00 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-wg0-x235.google.com (mail-wg0-x235.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c00::235]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B54291A1B51; Wed, 12 Nov 2014 15:38:59 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-wg0-f53.google.com with SMTP id b13so15490278wgh.40 for <multiple recipients>; Wed, 12 Nov 2014 15:38:58 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject :references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=2MJOu3iiQVp5mXodOvm3HtbrE0t3o5mB279NFiOZftw=; b=x/IAlB738Eg4WlVUAsp4uob+iL1jSe68bgB9jgK3+y3smk5N3RfnT2wUBSMRKpeN4R 9c8TZEU343m9aRislEl4mLoXRxwmZX615YJSooTrTcZ22g7jt0eM6W4sQ/Ywr7LKzfdn gVim3owgO8gdlPVPLZBTpH52VB4zQTYLqBoWF2e5jZHvvJ3ywgVsFa95MELh/2+bkwKv JZsNPXFkQQJkjSYO7sJHSBKLKEKjvYGIgfxFMdr201QViaVu5uQB9OBAlME/LOYNbs8I j2O5hG6fotjn1wzCWU0ixrm4dOIdwOjGbpdMGcEJTvLqBOZ79RcZ3TzFAN02NePQ3zLo wjZA==
X-Received: by 10.180.14.165 with SMTP id q5mr9651692wic.0.1415835538543; Wed, 12 Nov 2014 15:38:58 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ?IPv6:2001:67c:370:160:dce4:e30f:2f5:5fe7? (t2001067c03700160dce4e30f02f55fe7.wireless.v6.meeting.ietf.org. [2001:67c:370:160:dce4:e30f:2f5:5fe7]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id pf4sm22187703wjb.36.2014.11.12.15.38.56 for <multiple recipients> (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 12 Nov 2014 15:38:57 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <5463EF8B.9070605@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 12 Nov 2014 18:38:51 -0500
From: Rene Struik <rstruik.ext@gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.2.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
References: <20507.1415811045@sandelman.ca> <E045AECD98228444A58C61C200AE1BD848A4DCB4@xmb-rcd-x01.cisco.com> <5463BFBC.2010501@gmail.com> <3490.1415834872@sandelman.ca>
In-Reply-To: <3490.1415834872@sandelman.ca>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/6tisch/8C-E_CT-M1YTSZxD9QjY99t7ftY
Cc: "Pascal Thubert (pthubert)" <pthubert@cisco.com>, "6tisch@ietf.org" <6tisch@ietf.org>, "6tisch-security@ietf.org" <6tisch-security@ietf.org>
Subject: [6tisch] (procedural) Re: [6tisch-security] proposed security text for architecture draft
X-BeenThere: 6tisch@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Discuss link layer model for Deterministic IPv6 over the TSCH mode of IEEE 802.15.4e, and impacts on RPL and 6LoWPAN such as resource allocation" <6tisch.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/6tisch>, <mailto:6tisch-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/6tisch/>
List-Post: <mailto:6tisch@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:6tisch-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6tisch>, <mailto:6tisch-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 12 Nov 2014 23:39:04 -0000

I am afraid using the words you used puts people on the wrong footing 
and is a shame.

On 11/12/2014 6:27 PM, Michael Richardson wrote:
> Rene Struik <rstruik.ext@gmail.com> wrote:
>      > BTW - the text blurb (proposed security text) presumably comes from a
>      > "secure zero touch design team" effort. To my knowledge, such a design
>      > team has never been put in place. So, I am extremely puzzled here. Let
>      > us discuss during the 6TiSCH meeting tomorrow.
>
> The "secure zero touch design team" is my attempt to consisely elucidate the
> mandate of the 6tisch security design team.  I claim that this text is the
> rough consensus of the design team; I do not claim that it is endorsed by
> anyone other than myself, and I would welcome other approaches to solving the
> zero touch enrollment problem.
>
> I do not agree that there is any issue with the well-known beacon key.
>


-- 
email: rstruik.ext@gmail.com | Skype: rstruik
cell: +1 (647) 867-5658 | US: +1 (415) 690-7363

v2.37.1 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status