Re: [6tisch] Typeof sixtop subIE:short or long
Tengfei Chang <tengfei.chang@gmail.com> Sun, 17 January 2016 19:50 UTC
Return-Path: <tengfei.chang@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: 6tisch@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: 6tisch@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7B06A1A1A8A for <6tisch@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 17 Jan 2016 11:50:59 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.399
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.399 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, J_CHICKENPOX_55=0.6, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id dN4jIORmc4Ky for <6tisch@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 17 Jan 2016 11:50:57 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-yk0-x233.google.com (mail-yk0-x233.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4002:c07::233]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1966F1A0430 for <6tisch@ietf.org>; Sun, 17 Jan 2016 11:50:57 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-yk0-x233.google.com with SMTP id k129so570956713yke.0 for <6tisch@ietf.org>; Sun, 17 Jan 2016 11:50:57 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=60f53EvHNhiAxZQvnF8km5bNfANjQKRWRU9fDlNGwAo=; b=f95yyqM2RExMmJC9FPUEHR4AHxb6VFlMLyJwGCG4WD4Zf1AtPdkOH285bgRgDbL8G4 MaS8ozNRqaAXHTpdHTm+L2BMxGaxggNrOMhL1APdZYe/Iapi5eujVAZXblz8JJsjxSe/ lGonuZIM22rJfzM5JUNElR5zs0SsiROGvXwExlCNFMtCrutTfM4s5L8mWCpXPBHf/qOY GSKb4FR1gawNTEhyDGzyPPdV319k3qDL5tbBKHrwLGyo3y3PtDm1F4PwprUhEAsxu/4o OSFbLqvYax/+VR1pIy8vevezwzzVDY5Kxvhz4+ztsATQ7FmUm5rmwbgDomXccGMCtx5S B/Nw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=60f53EvHNhiAxZQvnF8km5bNfANjQKRWRU9fDlNGwAo=; b=IXJV3kJjBoVsalqTt4wbg98p+FHcmxT3jwYeDAoA8IHA5HaOWhN3HCIyyMRx8L4O1j 6eRtlnhxkoRrAPCRM4s3x7SYsuIYUvEBCR4I8mOl6VE8mWgKqfwgCVqG58UkBQwjVqIm GKi248CtuhXIsxF8178p8HKAvxKByX5vBAGmfsFFfCcrZJjsqSjAEkc9nw1tarWZjdoN K0KHj/11X8ECU5nGvZ8MyGflEJsYILUu6Vfgsr264Xw0KmSAV+wVsqry+iEorj2UNGnQ UpOvQnts2hEuzZjqMWyaTkdQGqN/dpVX44WN/WBsoT9F85UuOAF/iWrS2hMFEK8YPp4Q cXsA==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQnq4uKv8CC2s8KP9uAMGI1WESm9A+VZPNzMshhyATWI4GbF5vcz9iIxf5tNR97uyUc+tanRC3Ca5vtHkuoFqkjFUT4JSg==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.37.230.133 with SMTP id d127mr3698887ybh.134.1453060256342; Sun, 17 Jan 2016 11:50:56 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.37.201.5 with HTTP; Sun, 17 Jan 2016 11:50:56 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <645244049.3673071.1452546283479.JavaMail.yahoo@mail.yahoo.com>
References: <86A12C46-388F-4099-9347-C7EAEF123E4B@kinneyconsultingllc.com> <645244049.3673071.1452546283479.JavaMail.yahoo@mail.yahoo.com>
Date: Sun, 17 Jan 2016 20:50:56 +0100
Message-ID: <CAAdgstRsut4X1MF5n5XVXKotj5Jrhy3EUNTvqP5nFZS1G8ihCA@mail.gmail.com>
From: Tengfei Chang <tengfei.chang@gmail.com>
To: Qin Wang <qinwang6top@yahoo.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="94eb2c0a91e86aaa3805298cf477"
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/6tisch/I0J5FIl84L4NuQo9pYElKVFCC4w>
Cc: thejaswi Chandrashekhar <c.thejaswi@samsung.com>, Palattella Maria Rita <6tisch@ietf.org>, Plugtests <Plugtests.Plugtests@etsi.org>
Subject: Re: [6tisch] Typeof sixtop subIE:short or long
X-BeenThere: 6tisch@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Discuss link layer model for Deterministic IPv6 over the TSCH mode of IEEE 802.15.4e, and impacts on RPL and 6LoWPAN such as resource allocation" <6tisch.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/6tisch>, <mailto:6tisch-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/6tisch/>
List-Post: <mailto:6tisch@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:6tisch-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6tisch>, <mailto:6tisch-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 17 Jan 2016 19:50:59 -0000
Thanks all for the comments! Then we will use the recommended format (second one) on the plugtest! Tengfei On Mon, Jan 11, 2016 at 10:04 PM, Qin Wang <qinwang6top@yahoo.com> wrote: > I think both of the two format are fine. But, if IEEE802.15 recommends the > second one, I think we should choose the second. > > Thanks > Qin > > > On Monday, January 11, 2016 11:17 AM, "pat.kinney@kinneyconsultingllc.com" > <pat.kinney@kinneyconsultingllc.com> wrote: > > > Thank you for the figures, I agree on both, especially the second one. > The advantages of the recommended approach are: one octet shorter for case > of single subtype ID and 256 available subtype ID addresses for any length. > > Sincerely, Pat > > On 11, Jan2016, at 9:19, Tengfei Chang <tengfei.chang@gmail.com> wrote: > > Hi Pat, all, > > I would like to make sure whether this format will be the right format for > the plugtest and everyone will agree. The attached is the document > 15-15-0939-02. > > There are two options for the format we will use in the plugtest: > > 1. we use what defined in > https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-wang-6tisch-6top-sublayer-04, which use > the format defined in > IEEE802.15.4e-2012, section 5.2.4.3 (page 81). If we decide to use this > one, we need short/ long type of the subIE. > > > *Bits: 0-10* > *11-14* > *15* > *Octets: 2* > *32-35* > *36-39* > *40-47* > *Octets* > *Bits: 0-10* > *11-14* > *15* > Payload IE Content Length > Group ID > Type (0b1) > Length > Sub-type ID > Type > Ver > Code > SFID > other field > Length > (0x00) > Group ID (0xf) > Type (0b1) > Payload IE > Payload IE Content > Payload Termination IE > > > 2. we use what define in document 15-15-0939-02, which use the format > defined in last page of the document: > For example the 6P command defined in sublayer draft: > > the payload will be: > > *Bits: 0-10* > *11-14* > *15* > *16-23* > *24-27* > *28-31* > *32-39* > *octets* > *Bits: 0-10* > *11-14* > *15* > Payload IE Content Length > Group ID > Type (0b1) > Sub-type ID > Ver > Code > SFID > other field > Length > (0x00) > Group ID (0xf) > Type (0b1) > Payload IE > Payload IE Content > Payload Termination IE > > Do we agree on the second one? > > Tengfei > > On Fri, Jan 8, 2016 at 5:56 PM, Tengfei Chang <tengfei.chang@gmail.com> > wrote: > > I see. Thanks a lot Pat for the information! I found the document you > mentioned. I will update the format in the Golden Images. > > Have a good day! > Tengfei > > On Fri, Jan 8, 2016 at 5:25 PM, pat.kinney@kinneyconsultingllc.com < > pat.kinney@kinneyconsultingllc.com> wrote: > > Tengfei; > > The IEEE 802.15 IG 6T recommended a format for sub-IEs in document > 15-15-0939-02 sent to this reflector on 30 November 2015. The following is > an excerpt from that document: > "Accordingly, the IEEE 802.15 IG 6T recommends that the IETF use an > alternate scheme that restricts each Payload IE to only one sub-type ID and > content, i.e. no nesting. The advantages of this recommended scheme is > that it eliminates one octet from the total Payload IE, it allows a full > 256 sub-type IDs, and each sub-type length can be up to 2046 octets.” > Therefore, if 6tisch adopts the above recommendation, there would be no > long or short types. > > Pat > > Pat Kinney > *Kinney Consulting LLC* > IEEE 802.15 WG vice chair, SC chair > ISA100 co-chair, ISA100.20 chair > O: +1.847.960.3715 > pat.kinney@kinneyconsultingllc.com > > On 8, Jan2016, at 10:14, Tengfei Chang <tengfei.chang@gmail.com> wrote: > > Hello all, > > As I mentioned on the Call, the 6top sublayer draft seems didn't define > the type of subIE used by 6P command ,long or short type? Let me know if I > missed it from the draft! Thanks you! > > Regard, > Tengfei > _______________________________________________ > 6tisch mailing list > 6tisch@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6tisch > > > > > > > > > > <15-15-0939-02-0000-IETF_6tisch_IE_Information.docx> > > > _______________________________________________ > 6tisch mailing list > 6tisch@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6tisch > > >
- Re: [6tisch] Typeof sixtop subIE:short or long Tengfei Chang
- [6tisch] Typeof sixtop subIE:short or long Tengfei Chang
- Re: [6tisch] Typeof sixtop subIE:short or long pat.kinney@kinneyconsultingllc.com
- Re: [6tisch] Typeof sixtop subIE:short or long Tengfei Chang
- Re: [6tisch] Typeof sixtop subIE:short or long pat.kinney@kinneyconsultingllc.com
- Re: [6tisch] Typeof sixtop subIE:short or long Qin Wang
- Re: [6tisch] Typeof sixtop subIE:short or long Tengfei Chang
- Re: [6tisch] Typeof sixtop subIE:short or long Tengfei Chang
- Re: [6tisch] Typeof sixtop subIE:short or long pat.kinney@kinneyconsultingllc.com
- Re: [6tisch] Typeof sixtop subIE:short or long Tengfei Chang