Re: [6tisch] MSF draft - minimal cell
Tengfei Chang <tengfei.chang@gmail.com> Fri, 17 May 2019 14:00 UTC
Return-Path: <tengfei.chang@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: 6tisch@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: 6tisch@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CEB8912012A for <6tisch@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 17 May 2019 07:00:59 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.999
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id CbrYqOU2G0Tb for <6tisch@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 17 May 2019 07:00:58 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pf1-x433.google.com (mail-pf1-x433.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::433]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EF0B01200CC for <6tisch@ietf.org>; Fri, 17 May 2019 07:00:57 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-pf1-x433.google.com with SMTP id b76so3742170pfb.5 for <6tisch@ietf.org>; Fri, 17 May 2019 07:00:57 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=G5uCE6sGjaCDfio3bXZ9lYszSt24WouJMdTsqW6g9+Q=; b=nHR0Qx3sV2TetE+YXvw8OxdxuwKhfCl+57OIxV5JFp56IT2mj+1mnO+ASoKMZm9uYf C9JcIXY24m4VsTog+WBmxOVO4WXo5eeysZv/zU2LA2P53Eglj/gcStOWD4S9xnOJEOAE qKXHd/wxnQvOpjbbq1PPC/GctxfBIGasMh9vdOjKKLUFkt0sC733vh0CtMiZHssxdwA1 cMVQFUY82Y6PIkLQc+U7+DVQHcVo2MDoa147LHLiWfzC+x4uu6OQPHtq8vjFYyEMbsHK XZVDmIvBwg7bRMMGJGZghJOEdjeUpLy9xIS21trs2fy3UQaHVJrwKGp5kVYTPWt8av46 5eCQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=G5uCE6sGjaCDfio3bXZ9lYszSt24WouJMdTsqW6g9+Q=; b=gW6Xuw9DsKWukJUxEgSztkNmLZvg+9V5gkBdIoEUUlKNkLnY5o8c17XmfC7af75rFk S3RcNYaPRm0A7Mr3zTZXezLtLiNiItfZV4CcNcqVU9FCe1o+XTTcAxReifLSLA1PxnIc kDLRPLNfykPcwZgqt/QMd7LUoxRBN9Snq6uReouJMzauz83jXUVrkCdMcUSO6jjUPJoK t09CGxgWhWSDHloyigex0DG2/rPnPndovbpa7N/pYxnlFuLKqX7C+JIqSqJGSJOkp3GS NYxfzyQY4/iXhL0M6iN+awcalsIfx5gQQms9TQzLGDco9qV6OAnnZCrqpBsh/GPWUrJk tTgg==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAW5jfxEaqmWqEKQpufvnvKvnjAyKUqJvqLMWbTDU3u2YTm0FMQY 5+JAr96b/6sjp6DZCW7XExOerQaVHkI570G/8/A=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqw3njzcKe3gHwVXHp+bxllI4IuLXRSWk2Yca1SdMYBZJypkGBQPutKsNbfQhS3UEPPW3DWkRHtFD3tU3C/Lohw=
X-Received: by 2002:a62:d205:: with SMTP id c5mr60817583pfg.219.1558101657245; Fri, 17 May 2019 07:00:57 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <5A31BC26-D082-440E-B01D-9FACD997682D@tuhh.de>
In-Reply-To: <5A31BC26-D082-440E-B01D-9FACD997682D@tuhh.de>
From: Tengfei Chang <tengfei.chang@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 17 May 2019 16:00:43 +0200
Message-ID: <CAAdgstQ=4C2jXzr3x8OxWYRqFM4YOi1qKo0cZ6dtLg-LvBta=Q@mail.gmail.com>
To: Koojana Kuladinithi <koojana.kuladinithi@tuhh.de>
Cc: 6tisch@ietf.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000cddd8f058915cfdb"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/6tisch/JfkFbURkyQ_BD17naDNrCMQ1djc>
Subject: Re: [6tisch] MSF draft - minimal cell
X-BeenThere: 6tisch@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Discuss link layer model for Deterministic IPv6 over the TSCH mode of IEEE 802.15.4e, and impacts on RPL and 6LoWPAN such as resource allocation" <6tisch.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/6tisch>, <mailto:6tisch-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/6tisch/>
List-Post: <mailto:6tisch@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:6tisch-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6tisch>, <mailto:6tisch-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 17 May 2019 14:01:00 -0000
Good catch! It's probably written because in an old version when we send join request/response on the minimal cell. We will remove this sentence in next version. Thanks! Tengfei On Fri, May 17, 2019 at 3:53 PM Koojana Kuladinithi < koojana.kuladinithi@tuhh.de> wrote: > Hi > > MSF draft in section 2, I think the following sentence does not make sense > for me. > "Because the minimal cell is SHARED, the back-off algorithm defined in > [IEEE802154-2015] is used to resolve collisions." > > AFIK, there is no backoff for broadcast packets. Did I misunderstood > something here? > > Kind regards > > Koojana > > > > _______________________________________________ > 6tisch mailing list > 6tisch@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6tisch > -- Chang Tengfei, Postdoctoral Research Engineer, Inria
- [6tisch] MSF draft - minimal cell Koojana Kuladinithi
- Re: [6tisch] MSF draft - minimal cell Tengfei Chang