IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [6tisch] 6tisch join requirements for 6top

Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca> Mon, 08 December 2014 17:53 UTC

Return-Path: <mcr@sandelman.ca>
X-Original-To: 6tisch@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: 6tisch@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E963A1A879C for <6tisch@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 8 Dec 2014 09:53:31 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.901
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.901 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01, T_TVD_MIME_NO_HEADERS=0.01] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Gb6ELPrOQTWp for <6tisch@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 8 Dec 2014 09:53:30 -0800 (PST)
Received: from tuna.sandelman.ca (tuna.sandelman.ca [209.87.249.19]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4BEC31ACD47 for <6tisch@ietf.org>; Mon, 8 Dec 2014 09:53:30 -0800 (PST)
Received: from sandelman.ca (obiwan.sandelman.ca [IPv6:2607:f0b0:f:2::247]) by tuna.sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 19C6F20098; Mon, 8 Dec 2014 12:57:07 -0500 (EST)
Received: by sandelman.ca (Postfix, from userid 179) id F3896637F5; Mon, 8 Dec 2014 12:53:28 -0500 (EST)
Received: from sandelman.ca (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id DAF0F637F4; Mon, 8 Dec 2014 12:53:28 -0500 (EST)
From: Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
To: dejichen@tongji.edu.cn
In-Reply-To: <13696ffd.df22.14a102ec527.Coremail.dejichen@tongji.edu.cn>
References: <D0876D12.C03C%rsudhaak@cisco.com> <32412.1415737868@sandelman.ca> <D087B62D.C081%rsudhaak@cisco.com> <10653.1415740821@sandelman.ca> <CADJ9OA_LFkGDuyG_0bf=07d7cvC9FNRr5cMGTmYw2PR=g9XQHA@mail.gmail.com> <8193.1416253349@sandelman.ca> <21619.12717.53454.214321@fireball.kivinen.iki.fi> <E045AECD98228444A58C61C200AE1BD848A77CB5@xmb-rcd-x01.cisco.com> <21620.25926.119766.130028@fireball.kivinen.iki.fi> <54750807.9070901@berkeley.edu> <CADJ9OA_FS2qsTEGCDMMu_wwN=NsfARW26rw_9g9ROP=AHorB3g@mail.gmail.com> <674F70E5F2BE564CB06B6901FD3DD78B29D05F10@TGXML210.toshiba.local> <7934.1417488456@sandelman.ca> <CADJ9OA-rfcMRwNOtOmYnWB+bxH3eY7PTF85NPe_ozaq27JNPMA@mail.gmail.com> <26401CE1-D6CB-43CB-B195-AB1AA279EC9B@tzi.org> <13827.1417528828@sandelman.ca> <13696ffd.df22.14a102ec527.Coremail.dejichen@tongji.edu.cn>
X-Mailer: MH-E 8.2; nmh 1.3-dev; GNU Emacs 23.4.1
X-Face: $\n1pF)h^`}$H>Hk{L"x@)JS7<%Az}5RyS@k9X%29-lHB$Ti.V>2bi.~ehC0; <'$9xN5Ub# z!G,p`nR&p7Fz@^UXIn156S8.~^@MJ*mMsD7=QFeq%AL4m<nPbLgmtKK-5dC@#:k
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg="pgp-sha1"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
Date: Mon, 08 Dec 2014 12:53:28 -0500
Message-ID: <19935.1418061208@sandelman.ca>
Sender: mcr@sandelman.ca
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/6tisch/OSDX4jeATbsjwDMRTUkL_TH3Csk
Cc: Thomas Watteyne <watteyne@eecs.berkeley.edu>, Kris Pister <ksjp@berkeley.edu>, Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org>, "6tisch@ietf.org" <6tisch@ietf.org>, "yoshihiro.ohba@toshiba.co.jp" <yoshihiro.ohba@toshiba.co.jp>
Subject: Re: [6tisch] 6tisch join requirements for 6top
X-BeenThere: 6tisch@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Discuss link layer model for Deterministic IPv6 over the TSCH mode of IEEE 802.15.4e, and impacts on RPL and 6LoWPAN such as resource allocation" <6tisch.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/6tisch>, <mailto:6tisch-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/6tisch/>
List-Post: <mailto:6tisch@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:6tisch-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6tisch>, <mailto:6tisch-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 08 Dec 2014 17:53:32 -0000

dejichen@tongji.edu.cn wrote:
    > I just joined the group so do not have much confidence to offer
    > anything. Could we check if WirelessHART or ISA100.11a faces the same
    > problems and if they have resolved them? If so, could we adopt? Or
    > maybe they are not relatable here?

WirelessHART uses an installation specific key for the join network, which is
provisioned my the VAR/manufacturer. So it's one-touch, rather than
zero-touch, but may seem zero-touch to the installer.  The way which the
network security is configured via the application protocol has been
replicated.

I do not know if WirelessHART has one or two beacons.


--
Michael Richardson <mcr+IETF@sandelman.ca>, Sandelman Software Works
 -= IPv6 IoT consulting =-

v2.29.0 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status