[6tisch] xxx-bootstrap

peter van der Stok <stokcons@xs4all.nl> Wed, 30 November 2016 08:07 UTC

Return-Path: <stokcons@xs4all.nl>
X-Original-To: 6tisch@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: 6tisch@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7230A129533 for <6tisch@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 30 Nov 2016 00:07:29 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.621
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.621 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id NUIJ0p207f_c for <6tisch@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 30 Nov 2016 00:07:27 -0800 (PST)
Received: from lb3-smtp-cloud2.xs4all.net (lb3-smtp-cloud2.xs4all.net [194.109.24.29]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C9FF91295C2 for <6tisch@ietf.org>; Wed, 30 Nov 2016 00:06:12 -0800 (PST)
Received: from webmail.xs4all.nl ([194.109.20.204]) by smtp-cloud2.xs4all.net with ESMTP id E86A1u0084QBLo20186A5i; Wed, 30 Nov 2016 09:06:10 +0100
Received: from a82-95-140-48.adsl.xs4all.nl ([82.95.140.48]) by webmail.xs4all.nl with HTTP (HTTP/1.1 POST); Wed, 30 Nov 2016 09:06:10 +0100
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Date: Wed, 30 Nov 2016 09:06:10 +0100
From: peter van der Stok <stokcons@xs4all.nl>
To: 6tisch <6tisch@ietf.org>
Organization: vanderstok consultancy
Mail-Reply-To: consultancy@vanderstok.org
Message-ID: <efb18853e63642bc4a996dc419cd1efb@xs4all.nl>
X-Sender: stokcons@xs4all.nl (+CnAPlDVrpSyI9eroeGn00sC+dq/L0eV)
User-Agent: XS4ALL Webmail
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/6tisch/SJOgOF9Lxygaa7fzAiMuMLX9Eew>
Subject: [6tisch] xxx-bootstrap
X-BeenThere: 6tisch@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
Reply-To: consultancy@vanderstok.org
List-Id: "Discuss link layer model for Deterministic IPv6 over the TSCH mode of IEEE 802.15.4e, and impacts on RPL and 6LoWPAN such as resource allocation" <6tisch.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/6tisch>, <mailto:6tisch-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/6tisch/>
List-Post: <mailto:6tisch@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:6tisch-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6tisch>, <mailto:6tisch-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 30 Nov 2016 08:07:29 -0000

Hi 6tisch bootstrap followers,

Curently, we live in a confusing world wih many bootstrap proposals.
They all seem to have in common; a joining node, an assistant, a central 
authority, and Michael Richardson.
While each bootstrap proposal seems to have a different naming history.

Joking apart, I like to plead for a commmon bootstrap approach in 
6tisch, and anima to share parts of the bootstrap protocols.
I suspect that the discovery and the push- or pull start will be 
technology and context dependent.
My concern is with the number of protocols that the central authority 
has to support.
When there are too many bootstrap approaches, we may end up with as many 
protocol converters as there are bootstrap protocols.

The anima bootstrap team has recognized the importance of low resource 
devices by supporting the use of coap.
The drafts "EST over coaps" demonstrate that the support of two 
protocols (coap and http based) in the cental authority is realistic.

My plea is that we find a common protocol that replaces EST for the coap 
nodes.

I understand that after the bad experience with CoMI, the 6tisch people 
do not want to be dalayed again by waiting for a common approach.
Nevertheless, I think it is worthwhile to explore this avenue.

Any comments?

Peter

-- 
Peter van der Stok