Re: [6tisch] [6TiSCH] Node Behavior at Boot in SF0
Thomas Watteyne <thomas.watteyne@inria.fr> Wed, 16 November 2016 15:06 UTC
Return-Path: <thomas.watteyne@inria.fr>
X-Original-To: 6tisch@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: 6tisch@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 01908129607 for <6tisch@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 16 Nov 2016 07:06:59 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -7.896
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.896 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_SORBS_SPAM=0.5, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-1.497] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id A4d0LBhCGptk for <6tisch@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 16 Nov 2016 07:06:57 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail3-relais-sop.national.inria.fr (mail3-relais-sop.national.inria.fr [192.134.164.104]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id ABCC8129445 for <6tisch@ietf.org>; Wed, 16 Nov 2016 07:06:56 -0800 (PST)
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.31,500,1473112800"; d="scan'208,217";a="200562943"
Received: from mail-wm0-f46.google.com ([74.125.82.46]) by mail3-relais-sop.national.inria.fr with ESMTP/TLS/AES128-GCM-SHA256; 16 Nov 2016 16:06:31 +0100
Received: by mail-wm0-f46.google.com with SMTP id a197so245240734wmd.0 for <6tisch@ietf.org>; Wed, 16 Nov 2016 07:06:31 -0800 (PST)
X-Gm-Message-State: ABUngvdLjLsJuMzUf6Kh/bWheDdOzE6ynZrgVnQIuQeeP6hWhC7c4g71Sjtw+iyfj1/QHKWXp/69tS4W5LguPA==
X-Received: by 10.194.78.195 with SMTP id d3mr2241526wjx.96.1479308791311; Wed, 16 Nov 2016 07:06:31 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <CAAdgstS-_CszQZ-0aDf3sOrj4kuJ1MU6HR2Z97OoiecrPkSGdw@mail.gmail.com> <6f8fff17-2238-8470-7109-9a44b874eb00@toshiba.co.jp> <CADJ9OA8bVu=R+BGaesTZMnziAugs2gx80x15qsWeFeD=wpKepw@mail.gmail.com> <CAH7SZV84FhvZRMkLiStOZnVe+8RaP3aPA+QnRbQQnmSNLt4ttg@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAH7SZV84FhvZRMkLiStOZnVe+8RaP3aPA+QnRbQQnmSNLt4ttg@mail.gmail.com>
From: Thomas Watteyne <thomas.watteyne@inria.fr>
Date: Wed, 16 Nov 2016 15:06:20 +0000
X-Gmail-Original-Message-ID: <CADJ9OA-2677vjkHr2SiCN6YVCmUmOUQb89c6a=eAw1-eBkC5uw@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <CADJ9OA-2677vjkHr2SiCN6YVCmUmOUQb89c6a=eAw1-eBkC5uw@mail.gmail.com>
To: "Prof. Diego Dujovne" <diego.dujovne@mail.udp.cl>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="047d7bfd00100518b205416c6ba7"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/6tisch/TRhvrTk_G_wIEVU9WbVKCP5Zdck>
Cc: Yasuyuki Tanaka <yasuyuki9.tanaka@toshiba.co.jp>, "6tisch@ietf.org" <6tisch@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [6tisch] [6TiSCH] Node Behavior at Boot in SF0
X-BeenThere: 6tisch@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Discuss link layer model for Deterministic IPv6 over the TSCH mode of IEEE 802.15.4e, and impacts on RPL and 6LoWPAN such as resource allocation" <6tisch.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/6tisch>, <mailto:6tisch-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/6tisch/>
List-Post: <mailto:6tisch@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:6tisch-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6tisch>, <mailto:6tisch-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 16 Nov 2016 15:06:59 -0000
Diego, Fine for me. Could you bring it up during the WG meeting tomorrow? Thomas On Thu, 17 Nov 2016 at 00:02 Prof. Diego Dujovne <diego.dujovne@mail.udp.cl> wrote: > Yasuyuki, Thomas, > I suggest to keep the CLEAR command > after reboot/failure. > Regards, > > Diego > > 2016-11-16 11:05 GMT-03:00 Thomas Watteyne <thomas.watteyne@inria.fr>: > > @Tengfei, > Does that suggestion work for you or should we create an issue on SF0? > Thomas > > On Fri, Nov 11, 2016 at 8:50 PM, Yasuyuki Tanaka < > yasuyuki9.tanaka@toshiba.co.jp> wrote: > > Hi Tengfei, > > I think an assumption there is that a node has no state with its > neighbors just after booting up or restarting. On the other hand, a > neighbor of them may have cells allocated for the node. To resolve > such a possible inconsistency, the node issues CLEAR to each of its > neighbors. > > Best, > Yatch > > On 2016/11/02 15:29, Tengfei Chang wrote: > > All, > > For the decision when a node is restarted, the SF0 says: > > In order to define a known state after the node is restarted, a CLEAR > command is issued to each of the neighbor nodes to enable a new > allocation process. The 6P Initial Timeout Value provided by SF0 > should allow for the maximum number of TSCH link-layer retries, as > defined by Section 4.3.4 of [I-D.ietf-6tisch-6top-protocol < > https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-6tisch-6top-sf0-02#ref-I-D.ietf-6tisch-6top-protocol>] > TODO/ > REMARK: The initial timeout is currently under discussion. > > > A little suggestion is DO NOT issue a clear command to previous parent > until the nodes has reserved new cells to its new parent. This is to avoid > the swing if the reservation failed to its new parent and changed back to > previous parent. > > What do you think? > > Tengfei > > -- > Chang Tengfei, > Pre-Postdoctoral Research Engineer, Inria > > > _______________________________________________ > 6tisch mailing list > 6tisch@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6tisch > > > _______________________________________________ > 6tisch mailing list > 6tisch@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6tisch > > > > > -- > _______________________________________ > > Thomas Watteyne, PhD > Research Scientist & Innovator, Inria > Sr Networking Design Eng, Linear Tech > Founder & co-lead, UC Berkeley OpenWSN > Co-chair, IETF 6TiSCH > > www.thomaswatteyne.com > _______________________________________ > > _______________________________________________ > 6tisch mailing list > 6tisch@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6tisch > > > > > -- > DIEGO DUJOVNE > Profesor Asociado > Escuela de Informática y Telecomunicaciones > Facultad de IngenierÃa - Universidad Diego Portales - Chile > www.ingenieria.udp.cl > (56 2) 676 8125 >
- [6tisch] [6TiSCH] Node Behavior at Boot in SF0 Tengfei Chang
- Re: [6tisch] [6TiSCH] Node Behavior at Boot in SF0 Yasuyuki Tanaka
- Re: [6tisch] [6TiSCH] Node Behavior at Boot in SF0 Thomas Watteyne
- Re: [6tisch] [6TiSCH] Node Behavior at Boot in SF0 Tengfei Chang
- Re: [6tisch] [6TiSCH] Node Behavior at Boot in SF0 Prof. Diego Dujovne
- Re: [6tisch] [6TiSCH] Node Behavior at Boot in SF0 Thomas Watteyne
- Re: [6tisch] [6TiSCH] Node Behavior at Boot in SF0 Prof. Diego Dujovne
- Re: [6tisch] [6TiSCH] Node Behavior at Boot in SF0 Thomas Watteyne
- Re: [6tisch] [6TiSCH] Node Behavior at Boot in SF0 Yasuyuki Tanaka
- Re: [6tisch] [6TiSCH] Node Behavior at Boot in SF0 Thomas Watteyne
- Re: [6tisch] [6TiSCH] Node Behavior at Boot in SF0 Yasuyuki Tanaka
- Re: [6tisch] [6TiSCH] Node Behavior at Boot in SF0 Thomas Watteyne
- Re: [6tisch] [6TiSCH] Node Behavior at Boot in SF0 Prof. Diego Dujovne
- Re: [6tisch] [6TiSCH] Node Behavior at Boot in SF0 Yasuyuki Tanaka
- Re: [6tisch] [6TiSCH] Node Behavior at Boot in SF0 Yasuyuki Tanaka
- Re: [6tisch] [6TiSCH] Node Behavior at Boot in SF0 Michael Richardson
- Re: [6tisch] [6TiSCH] Node Behavior at Boot in SF0 Thomas Watteyne