Re: [6tisch] xxx-bootstrap
Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca> Thu, 01 December 2016 00:18 UTC
Return-Path: <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
X-Original-To: 6tisch@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: 6tisch@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1E1F7129BE0
for <6tisch@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 30 Nov 2016 16:18:53 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.797
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.797 tagged_above=-999 required=5
tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-2.896, SPF_PASS=-0.001]
autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44])
by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
with ESMTP id ojaqZVLJOd4h for <6tisch@ietfa.amsl.com>;
Wed, 30 Nov 2016 16:18:50 -0800 (PST)
Received: from tuna.sandelman.ca (tuna.sandelman.ca
[IPv6:2607:f0b0:f:3:216:3eff:fe7c:d1f3])
(using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3FF4F12998B
for <6tisch@ietf.org>; Wed, 30 Nov 2016 16:18:50 -0800 (PST)
Received: from sandelman.ca (obiwan.sandelman.ca [209.87.249.21])
by tuna.sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 465BD200A7;
Wed, 30 Nov 2016 19:35:53 -0500 (EST)
Received: from obiwan.sandelman.ca (localhost [IPv6:::1])
by sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0F888637A6;
Wed, 30 Nov 2016 19:18:49 -0500 (EST)
From: Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
To: 6tisch <6tisch@ietf.org>
In-Reply-To: <efb18853e63642bc4a996dc419cd1efb@xs4all.nl>
References: <efb18853e63642bc4a996dc419cd1efb@xs4all.nl>
X-Mailer: MH-E 8.6; nmh 1.6+dev; GNU Emacs 24.5.1
X-Face: $\n1pF)h^`}$H>Hk{L"x@)JS7<%Az}5RyS@k9X%29-lHB$Ti.V>2bi.~ehC0;
<'$9xN5Ub#
z!G,p`nR&p7Fz@^UXIn156S8.~^@MJ*mMsD7=QFeq%AL4m<nPbLgmtKK-5dC@#:k
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-=";
micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
Date: Wed, 30 Nov 2016 19:18:49 -0500
Message-ID: <31466.1480551529@obiwan.sandelman.ca>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/6tisch/Th7dmubd7intVkPgDJr26tM5ciY>
Cc: consultancy@vanderstok.org
Subject: Re: [6tisch] xxx-bootstrap
X-BeenThere: 6tisch@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Discuss link layer model for Deterministic IPv6 over the TSCH mode
of IEEE 802.15.4e,
and impacts on RPL and 6LoWPAN such as resource allocation" <6tisch.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/6tisch>,
<mailto:6tisch-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/6tisch/>
List-Post: <mailto:6tisch@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:6tisch-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6tisch>,
<mailto:6tisch-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 01 Dec 2016 00:18:54 -0000
Hi, I haven't read the entire thread yet, but I wanted to pull out another
email from a private thread about some ideas I had before I forgot.
This would be the phase 1. Now that I understand more about EDHOC,
I think that the certificate exchange and EDHOC setup would occur
at the GET /nonce phase.
Peter, if this is what you have in mind, then let's develop one of the
EST/CoAP drafts into saying this.
====
I am thinking about if we can come up with a mechanism that can be driven by
either side, which uses the same protocol and message encodings.
I had been thinking last night that CMS was getting in the way, but I
think that actually that's probably not the case; we are going to use
pkcs7/11 anyway, and if that's really the extent of it, then no big deal.
I'm trying to find a way to merge this into netconf-keystore essentially, and
that document is not really particular about the formats.
I'm looking at draft-ietf-anima-bootstrapping-keyinfra-04 section 5.7,
and EST section 4.
I imagine that one can reverse the process in 6tisch, and we could POST
From the JCE to client /cacerts, etc...
So, if the straight EST process looks like:
new-node registrar
POST /requestaudittoken--> [includes nonce]
<--- 200 OK + audit token- [section 5.2]
GET /cacerts ----------->
<--- domain certificate-- (application/pkcs7-mime,
CMC Simple PKI RESPONSE)
GET /csrattrs ---------->
<--- app/csrattrs ------- [ASN as per 7030]
POST /simpleenroll------> (PKCS#10 Cert Req)
<--- LDevID cert--------- (pkcs7)
Then the JCE driven process should instead look like:
pledge JCE
<--- CoAP GET /nonce-----
----- 200 OK, nonce ----> [could be empty if nonce
<--- CoAP POST /voucher-- {audit token or ownership voucher}
----- 200 OK------------> [or 4xx or 5xx code! ]
<--- CoAP POST /cacerts-- [block-transfer] [maybe not??]
(application/pkcs7-mime,
CMC Simple PKI RESPONSE)
----200 OK-------------->
<--- CoAP POST /csrattrs- [ASN as per 7030]
----200 OK-------------->
<--- CoAP GET /csr------
----200 OK ---PKCS10 ---- [PKCS#10 Cert Req]
<--- CoAP POST /cert----- [PKCS7 Certificate]
----200 OK --------------
Except that ideally, the above would be described in YANG with Kent's help
in netconf-keystore.
(Pascal, in our SoW #7, the above protocol would be Deliverable 3, btw)
--
Michael Richardson <mcr+IETF@sandelman.ca>ca>, Sandelman Software Works
-= IPv6 IoT consulting =-
- [6tisch] xxx-bootstrap peter van der Stok
- Re: [6tisch] xxx-bootstrap Mališa Vučinić
- Re: [6tisch] xxx-bootstrap peter van der Stok
- Re: [6tisch] xxx-bootstrap Mališa Vučinić
- Re: [6tisch] xxx-bootstrap Michael Richardson
- Re: [6tisch] xxx-bootstrap Michael Richardson
- Re: [6tisch] xxx-bootstrap peter van der Stok
- Re: [6tisch] xxx-bootstrap peter van der Stok
- Re: [6tisch] xxx-bootstrap Göran Selander
- Re: [6tisch] xxx-bootstrap peter van der Stok
- Re: [6tisch] xxx-bootstrap Michael Richardson
- Re: [6tisch-security] [6tisch] xxx-bootstrap Michael Richardson
- Re: [6tisch-security] [6tisch] xxx-bootstrap Göran Selander
- Re: [6tisch] xxx-bootstrap Göran Selander
- Re: [6tisch] xxx-bootstrap peter van der Stok
- Re: [6tisch] xxx-bootstrap Mališa Vučinić
- Re: [6tisch] xxx-bootstrap peter van der Stok
- Re: [6tisch] xxx-bootstrap Mališa Vučinić