Re: [6tisch] Extending CoJP (minimal-security) for non-6TiSCH 802.15.4 networks

Christian Amsüss <christian@amsuess.com> Mon, 20 September 2021 09:13 UTC

Return-Path: <christian@amsuess.com>
X-Original-To: 6tisch@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: 6tisch@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9EE813A1B97 for <6tisch@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 20 Sep 2021 02:13:23 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id t--pisF_ynKj for <6tisch@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 20 Sep 2021 02:13:18 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from prometheus.amsuess.com (alt.prometheus.amsuess.com [IPv6:2a01:4f8:190:3064::3]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AB4B73A1B99 for <6tisch@ietf.org>; Mon, 20 Sep 2021 02:13:17 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from poseidon-mailhub.amsuess.com (unknown [IPv6:2a02:b18:c13b:8010:a800:ff:fede:b1bd]) by prometheus.amsuess.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8D61F4168D; Mon, 20 Sep 2021 11:13:14 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from poseidon-mailbox.amsuess.com (hermes.amsuess.com [10.13.13.254]) by poseidon-mailhub.amsuess.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 61EB1D7; Mon, 20 Sep 2021 11:13:13 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from hephaistos.amsuess.com (unknown [IPv6:2a02:b18:c13b:8010:d6f8:77c2:2f6a:14e7]) by poseidon-mailbox.amsuess.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id F0C7710A; Mon, 20 Sep 2021 11:13:12 +0200 (CEST)
Received: (nullmailer pid 333268 invoked by uid 1000); Mon, 20 Sep 2021 09:13:11 -0000
Date: Mon, 20 Sep 2021 11:13:11 +0200
From: Christian =?iso-8859-1?Q?Ams=FCss?= <christian@amsuess.com>
To: Michael Richardson <mcr@sandelman.ca>
Cc: 6tisch@ietf.org
Message-ID: <YUhQp3wQ6O3qXp6R@hephaistos.amsuess.com>
References: <YUcakTFqibo5wEfe@hephaistos.amsuess.com> <102718.1632080924@dooku>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="PgiuPfxsZnjn40RX"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <102718.1632080924@dooku>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/6tisch/VESqiQkPao3dXONguPyGb3akQqE>
Subject: Re: [6tisch] Extending CoJP (minimal-security) for non-6TiSCH 802.15.4 networks
X-BeenThere: 6tisch@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Discuss link layer model for Deterministic IPv6 over the TSCH mode of IEEE 802.15.4e, and impacts on RPL and 6LoWPAN such as resource allocation" <6tisch.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/6tisch>, <mailto:6tisch-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/6tisch/>
List-Post: <mailto:6tisch@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:6tisch-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6tisch>, <mailto:6tisch-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 20 Sep 2021 09:13:24 -0000

Hello Michael,

On Sun, Sep 19, 2021 at 03:48:44PM -0400, Michael Richardson wrote:
> > have the discussions in the development of CoJP ever sidetracked to its
> > applicability for non-TSCH setups?
> 
> not really.

thanks, that's good to know too.

> I think that the CoJP worked very very hard to keep it at one round trip.
> 
> This is due to congestion concerns further up the RPL tree.
> I don't perceive that these other technologies have this problem to the same
> degree.

Running 6LoWPAN in other modes could still be RPL-based. The nodes close
to the BR would still see much traffic, though they might deal with it
differently than 6TiSCH. (Especially with the simpler modes, I expect
congestion to even have worse effects than with 6TiSCH).

Anyhow, there don't appear to be any parts that are particularly hard to
implement that could be dropped with a less strict one-roundtrip rule,
so overall it's still a good property.

I'll explore this further as time permits, and hope to at some point
come back asking for opinions on a concrete proposal.

Thanks
c

-- 
To use raw power is to make yourself infinitely vulnerable to greater powers.
  -- Bene Gesserit axiom