[6tisch] MSF adapts to traffic only for secured packets
Tengfei Chang <tengfei.chang@gmail.com> Thu, 05 December 2019 16:18 UTC
Return-Path: <tengfei.chang@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: 6tisch@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: 6tisch@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3CDEF12006D for <6tisch@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 5 Dec 2019 08:18:02 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.398
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.398 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_SBL=0.5, URIBL_SBL_A=0.1] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id mrdubDv92jmv for <6tisch@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 5 Dec 2019 08:18:01 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-pf1-x431.google.com (mail-pf1-x431.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::431]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 37F3D12007C for <6tisch@ietf.org>; Thu, 5 Dec 2019 08:18:01 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-pf1-x431.google.com with SMTP id y14so1819809pfm.13 for <6tisch@ietf.org>; Thu, 05 Dec 2019 08:18:01 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=+nzRIrwjQcOb8470DzpwoXdFn6mlBZynDuDHfN/1CRE=; b=mdhNSjNqR3QfDSOvO1BPXJIIjKMHE9foKUFyIBBHii1JofeqZD46VXzdhSr0MyvRbk ldRPgfMfOfUXYfas3ei7m440wsmAxuRiTqG1kOPRT4S/dP7qHQed2JQ0OS23ldqQYbvp QfUpJBX7NMVXgl0b+zrMouNum3ClNtHbtDjsZWV+gDsxFmi6Q0HfcswayflGPFD42Xbl GxFjLygJDhR7CVMeeQX3dOqUbo+A6H68VcdbEfE18OckhZHf6NeGHil/QaRAAJocdn2E 50EpryFF3ObZwIHaifKsR4hm0kID2A5f5rXMg+ts/J+HOiobV1Gg1tHG7uB+COOvisY+ f3yQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=+nzRIrwjQcOb8470DzpwoXdFn6mlBZynDuDHfN/1CRE=; b=QEiuiPpQzvxSL1qCiwsLH1EtBzixuezfv/x4R4TOBWUBi7q2+BL7Wq4LgmKWtJDGFP DXrJgnH8BRy6MvE4BeLsh0uwQEEt0Bv13f5oB6uQGkTk9J6/uJoUTjr7IL29RZ/GyFfl AQM1geLdw4fKL0wuezLKT8o684CVIVV8Z4NC6ypD6AIoWku/eMQCMGyRHk4Z1iVtKZ1E IntQwPqhtScGUy+yG2rnkLQYnubZT5zegNhow+ECyrtrrtxez/zWEK/o2EwJbd3WrEAt zd97Ros2u2TPWplZbvYC84inC07yEHFbP187d7GP0WV/UQ8S2UnFOQ8hUIHK3s3MZA/a IBxw==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAXzG8Ztwv+llNximJ44THAAeZpOtU6neG7dtBr+3UFJsU1ZcHro s5dsZRM9qhn08ZCYLc2fnW3cNyj85gVbZiPOUMaqY0A7
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqw6VrvpezqS0MlzeFykT63auaurY5zdyvHKFtMQ7cmRhE9VAlFzoDEljD+4ppcCWTYLuiJolI7KbrJn/9P/L28=
X-Received: by 2002:a62:e817:: with SMTP id c23mr9449366pfi.24.1575562680199; Thu, 05 Dec 2019 08:18:00 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
From: Tengfei Chang <tengfei.chang@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 05 Dec 2019 17:17:48 +0100
Message-ID: <CAAdgstRGHyRKoMLBhRih8yHwDvf-DTp42ZTEBmBP57FSgt8MyA@mail.gmail.com>
To: 6tisch <6tisch@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000dfec3a0598f74567"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/6tisch/ZfObTyGLJMaMVQ3W8IlHnaCsuIQ>
Subject: [6tisch] MSF adapts to traffic only for secured packets
X-BeenThere: 6tisch@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Discuss link layer model for Deterministic IPv6 over the TSCH mode of IEEE 802.15.4e, and impacts on RPL and 6LoWPAN such as resource allocation" <6tisch.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/6tisch>, <mailto:6tisch-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/6tisch/>
List-Post: <mailto:6tisch@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:6tisch-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6tisch>, <mailto:6tisch-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 05 Dec 2019 16:18:02 -0000
Hi All, For securing the MSF, (comments from minimal security, thanks for the input!) In the next version of MSF, we need to add sentence saying MSF only adapts the traffic which is secured, practically by checking the DSCP value set with zero or no, which is in IPv6 header. In other hands, MSF is a link layer protocol, it doesn't suppose to know the frame is a IPv6 packet or not. no need to say a field value. I would like to have some suggestions/comments on this issue. Does anyone know other way to make the SF not adapt to unsecured traffic without knowing upper layer field? Thanks! Tengfei -- —————————————————————————————————————— Dr. Tengfei, Chang Postdoctoral Research Engineer, Inria www.tchang.org/ ——————————————————————————————————————
- [6tisch] MSF adapts to traffic only for secured p… Tengfei Chang
- Re: [6tisch] MSF adapts to traffic only for secur… Yasuyuki Tanaka
- Re: [6tisch] MSF adapts to traffic only for secur… Pascal Thubert (pthubert)
- Re: [6tisch] MSF adapts to traffic only for secur… Mališa Vučinić
- Re: [6tisch] MSF adapts to traffic only for secur… Yasuyuki Tanaka
- Re: [6tisch] MSF adapts to traffic only for secur… Mališa Vučinić
- Re: [6tisch] MSF adapts to traffic only for secur… Yasuyuki Tanaka
- Re: [6tisch] MSF adapts to traffic only for secur… Tengfei Chang
- Re: [6tisch] MSF adapts to traffic only for secur… Pascal Thubert (pthubert)
- Re: [6tisch] MSF adapts to traffic only for secur… Yasuyuki Tanaka
- Re: [6tisch] MSF adapts to traffic only for secur… Tengfei Chang
- Re: [6tisch] MSF adapts to traffic only for secur… Yasuyuki Tanaka
- Re: [6tisch] MSF adapts to traffic only for secur… Tengfei Chang
- Re: [6tisch] MSF adapts to traffic only for secur… Pascal Thubert (pthubert)
- Re: [6tisch] MSF adapts to traffic only for secur… Tengfei Chang