IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [6tisch] [6tisch-security] proposed security text for architecture draft

"Pascal Thubert (pthubert)" <pthubert@cisco.com> Fri, 14 November 2014 01:50 UTC

Return-Path: <pthubert@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: 6tisch@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: 6tisch@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5C6831A017E; Thu, 13 Nov 2014 17:50:03 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -15.095
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-15.095 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.594, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 0aqP63CPmKVo; Thu, 13 Nov 2014 17:50:01 -0800 (PST)
Received: from alln-iport-6.cisco.com (alln-iport-6.cisco.com [173.37.142.93]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1E9E01A015F; Thu, 13 Nov 2014 17:50:01 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=854; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1415929802; x=1417139402; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:references: in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version; bh=OXNWw/5l93ahLFEZGGG+d7CoLpZ1qAaqcprbf32M0tw=; b=mZcs3Xgy/G+puWYgxZPANAnwl7KOX9cW9iKbDdxRIMBuakaHOuk8w8I7 vIQtg5VFhuIOVHioSTFh+lH83kU0qRgyNfQ8zOnVb0SzE83M3XObQgbjy PuwLgEZD4WuBHyn+wjO7T4qC2Exap06sYWo3sFJTvuNah60S9dJ4PnkJ8 8=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AhYFAGBfZVStJV2S/2dsb2JhbABbgw6BLdRJAoEhFgEBAQEBfYQCAQEBAwF5BQsCAQgSBi4yFw4CBAENBYg4CdBwAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBF41GAYMaMweDLYEeAQSLTYRJgiSLd5ZnghCBbG2CSwEBAQ
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.07,382,1413244800"; d="scan'208";a="96491428"
Received: from rcdn-core-10.cisco.com ([173.37.93.146]) by alln-iport-6.cisco.com with ESMTP; 14 Nov 2014 01:49:46 +0000
Received: from xhc-aln-x14.cisco.com (xhc-aln-x14.cisco.com [173.36.12.88]) by rcdn-core-10.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id sAE1njxS004178 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL); Fri, 14 Nov 2014 01:49:45 GMT
Received: from xmb-rcd-x01.cisco.com ([169.254.1.165]) by xhc-aln-x14.cisco.com ([173.36.12.88]) with mapi id 14.03.0195.001; Thu, 13 Nov 2014 19:49:45 -0600
From: "Pascal Thubert (pthubert)" <pthubert@cisco.com>
To: Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>, Pat Kinney <pat.kinney@KINNEYCONSULTINGLLC.COM>
Thread-Topic: [6tisch-security] proposed security text for architecture draft
Thread-Index: AQHP/6xVTHjXM0FJ6E6z0WAXP4mkhpxfWy4i
Date: Fri, 14 Nov 2014 01:49:44 +0000
Message-ID: <62CCF286-3362-4E5A-ACB1-8BDAA4184CEA@cisco.com>
References: <20507.1415811045@sandelman.ca> <674F70E5F2BE564CB06B6901FD3DD78B272A8EFA@TGXML210.toshiba.local> <E045AECD98228444A58C61C200AE1BD848A4F099@xmb-rcd-x01.cisco.com>, <11870.1415929378@sandelman.ca>
In-Reply-To: <11870.1415929378@sandelman.ca>
Accept-Language: fr-FR, en-US
Content-Language: fr-FR
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/6tisch/_y6QhQFSAXjeOasUHKTC500nCWg
Cc: "6tisch@ietf.org" <6tisch@ietf.org>, "6tisch-security@ietf.org" <6tisch-security@ietf.org>, "yoshihiro.ohba@toshiba.co.jp" <yoshihiro.ohba@toshiba.co.jp>
Subject: Re: [6tisch] [6tisch-security] proposed security text for architecture draft
X-BeenThere: 6tisch@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Discuss link layer model for Deterministic IPv6 over the TSCH mode of IEEE 802.15.4e, and impacts on RPL and 6LoWPAN such as resource allocation" <6tisch.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/6tisch>, <mailto:6tisch-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/6tisch/>
List-Post: <mailto:6tisch@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:6tisch-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6tisch>, <mailto:6tisch-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 14 Nov 2014 01:50:03 -0000

CC ing Pat

Pat, would you confirm whether we can we piggy back an IPv6 RA with an EB?

Thanks a bunch!

Pascal

> Le 13 nov. 2014 à 15:43, Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca> a écrit :
> 
> 
> Pascal Thubert (pthubert) <pthubert@cisco.com> wrote:
>> an interface ID associated to the address, which is missing in the RH.
>> Yesterday we discussed an "optimistic" usage of a global address that
>> the joining device would form.  This requires the joining device to
>> receive an RA. Is that unacceptable?
> 
> Yes, because the RA is always sent.
> 
> An open question was: could we find a way to hide the RA in the Enhanced
> Beacon, which reduces a packet on the wire.
> 
> -- 
> Michael Richardson <mcr+IETF@sandelman.ca>, Sandelman Software Works
> -= IPv6 IoT consulting =-
> 
> 
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email