IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [6tisch] #41 (minimal): intended status for draft minimal

Brian Haberman <brian@innovationslab.net> Mon, 30 November 2015 18:10 UTC

Return-Path: <brian@innovationslab.net>
X-Original-To: 6tisch@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: 6tisch@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2AA001B2A91 for <6tisch@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 30 Nov 2015 10:10:39 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.6
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Kf0BYTsK7hgP for <6tisch@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 30 Nov 2015 10:10:38 -0800 (PST)
Received: from uillean.fuaim.com (uillean.fuaim.com [206.197.161.140]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3C05C1B2A8F for <6tisch@ietf.org>; Mon, 30 Nov 2015 10:10:38 -0800 (PST)
Received: from clairseach.fuaim.com (clairseach-high.fuaim.com [206.197.161.158]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by uillean.fuaim.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1CEE7880D1; Mon, 30 Nov 2015 10:10:38 -0800 (PST)
Received: from clemson.jhuapl.edu (swifi-nat.jhuapl.edu [128.244.87.133]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by clairseach.fuaim.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B9DFF328081A; Mon, 30 Nov 2015 10:10:37 -0800 (PST)
To: Kris Pister <ksjp@berkeley.edu>, 6tisch@ietf.org
References: <060.92a20915e49c32f8bffbbbb0b4a66869@tools.ietf.org> <075.1f97e51c53b1c124937a2b6c7fca39d7@tools.ietf.org> <a864c3f122d24d638adf712ed92054cd@XCH-RCD-001.cisco.com> <565C8BC8.900@berkeley.edu> <565C8E1E.3040106@innovationslab.net> <565C8EB7.5000902@berkeley.edu>
From: Brian Haberman <brian@innovationslab.net>
Message-ID: <565C911C.4070209@innovationslab.net>
Date: Mon, 30 Nov 2015 13:10:36 -0500
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.10; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.3.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <565C8EB7.5000902@berkeley.edu>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg="pgp-sha256"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="bVMnoVDEg3sASmQJmig3DN6520SaLOK7N"
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/6tisch/dH6mwyZc3cCWLpol7GmalF6eomc>
Subject: Re: [6tisch] #41 (minimal): intended status for draft minimal
X-BeenThere: 6tisch@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Discuss link layer model for Deterministic IPv6 over the TSCH mode of IEEE 802.15.4e, and impacts on RPL and 6LoWPAN such as resource allocation" <6tisch.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/6tisch>, <mailto:6tisch-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/6tisch/>
List-Post: <mailto:6tisch@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:6tisch-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6tisch>, <mailto:6tisch-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 30 Nov 2015 18:10:39 -0000

Hi Kris,

On 11/30/15 1:00 PM, Kris Pister wrote:
> That was the original goal.
> 

Hmm... Then there may be more things missing from this document then.
IPv6 address generation rules/guidance, NDP operation, SLAAC
functionality, MTU behavior, etc. all come to mind for that kind of
document. Granted, those may be covered via reference to other RFCs...

The main point is that if that is the goal, it is not clear when the
Abstract starts with "This document describes the minimal set of rules
to operate an IEEE 802.15.4 Timeslotted Channel Hopping (TSCH) network."

Brian

> ksjp
> 
> On 11/30/2015 9:57 AM, Brian Haberman wrote:
>> Is this document supposed
>> to be the 802.15.4e equivalent of RFC 2464?

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email