Re: [6tisch] time to close WG

Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca> Wed, 23 March 2022 17:06 UTC

Return-Path: <mcr@sandelman.ca>
X-Original-To: 6tisch@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: 6tisch@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9CB793A18FA for <6tisch@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 23 Mar 2022 10:06:36 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.909
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.909 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id MHTQ2PJmiFJJ for <6tisch@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 23 Mar 2022 10:06:30 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from relay.sandelman.ca (relay.cooperix.net [176.58.120.209]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9A9A73A18E7 for <6tisch@ietf.org>; Wed, 23 Mar 2022 10:06:30 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from dooku.sandelman.ca (dhcp-885d.meeting.ietf.org [31.133.136.93]) by relay.sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5A74A1F458; Wed, 23 Mar 2022 17:06:28 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by dooku.sandelman.ca (Postfix, from userid 179) id 9825D1A01C2; Wed, 23 Mar 2022 18:06:27 +0100 (CET)
From: Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
To: "Pascal Thubert \(pthubert\)" <pthubert@cisco.com>
cc: "6tisch\@ietf.org" <6tisch@ietf.org>
In-reply-to: <CO1PR11MB488110DA62A3DF24456DE1C3D8189@CO1PR11MB4881.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
References: <74383.1648053630@dooku> <CO1PR11MB488110DA62A3DF24456DE1C3D8189@CO1PR11MB4881.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
Comments: In-reply-to "Pascal Thubert (pthubert)" <pthubert@cisco.com> message dated "Wed, 23 Mar 2022 16:51:40 +0000."
X-Mailer: MH-E 8.6+git; nmh 1.7.1; GNU Emacs 26.3
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
Date: Wed, 23 Mar 2022 18:06:27 +0100
Message-ID: <76552.1648055187@dooku>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/6tisch/f_QB9bw1v_n4nh9-XcR_i0PJ0qc>
Subject: Re: [6tisch] time to close WG
X-BeenThere: 6tisch@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Discuss link layer model for Deterministic IPv6 over the TSCH mode of IEEE 802.15.4e, and impacts on RPL and 6LoWPAN such as resource allocation" <6tisch.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/6tisch>, <mailto:6tisch-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/6tisch/>
List-Post: <mailto:6tisch@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:6tisch-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6tisch>, <mailto:6tisch-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 23 Mar 2022 17:06:43 -0000

Pascal Thubert (pthubert) <pthubert@cisco.com> wrote:
    > We kept it open in case new work comes up. This might happen once RAW
    > has progressed to the point that it requires interfaces that 6TiSCH can
    > implement in the 802.15.4 TSCH case. Maybe we can observe RAW, wait and
    > see ?

Yeah, that's reasonable to me.
I just couldn't defend 6tisch in the hallway.



-- 
Michael Richardson <mcr+IETF@sandelman.ca>ca>, Sandelman Software Works
 -= IPv6 IoT consulting =-