IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [6tisch] Finally !!

Alexander Pelov <a@ackl.io> Tue, 01 June 2021 14:59 UTC

Return-Path: <alexander@ackl.io>
X-Original-To: 6tisch@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: 6tisch@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D1BCB3A1B06 for <6tisch@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 1 Jun 2021 07:59:25 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.897
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.897 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=ackl-io.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id KNzaXBJzqOJb for <6tisch@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 1 Jun 2021 07:59:20 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-il1-x135.google.com (mail-il1-x135.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::135]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 74AA23A1B04 for <6tisch@ietf.org>; Tue, 1 Jun 2021 07:59:20 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-il1-x135.google.com with SMTP id u3so13201537ilv.8 for <6tisch@ietf.org>; Tue, 01 Jun 2021 07:59:20 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ackl-io.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=7nXiRzYk0Xve9b7CX4GrEp9aGdpt562EJy2EmV+SuK4=; b=t2ldhZtcvOHLIcA4Gs18FgVSMTZLLizxQ260UX50x4CyIUDBNnJg9MEE0O912W4FRC oE7t9eTUrGG5gOL8ulDFZD2IzwvAIpr6uXAn/asybH56asqbBvloRrXNZJE1HjrWMA1Z UbLp6v9AOBP50/+yIbkHTGkCDktrSR4Zqe7A9m09vF+sEjFTOz9QYFuv1Qf/mENgAYkc WQH1aGQkEJbanxJ05m13soqf575gmsnVx2fZaOyW0techp2K2APfffc6hflaxe4aQXv/ GYDorrloTbg5TMfTL08rVDf2wy0KbwnlFMlfZmXolyAE2Ru9NH9wx5UnDhhXvJzFUf2l 9/EQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=7nXiRzYk0Xve9b7CX4GrEp9aGdpt562EJy2EmV+SuK4=; b=gSrTXbE9tkJ08F5yErmPj6xJlD87Mdo0peShSB6xyFXg6HoCTa/6Yfprk+vquxnFc3 w5tpPog5Kz9Ovz7lEkQst6/IayqRIHMDiTLBh2wFPBOgjFclFX6+s7R9c87McZtkJWuF 7Dh1OxOvSJWHLaVbDtD3lZwmmf4Gp5K5zel5WEj5XWC95VMYxGnVk8H0H9HRMocswuaE 5e+i5npSRRMkKyo2zZboLDVedAAsU193vcPgOfZXsp0Yi5Vq8y9/5hhKokLK5I1Mlh2A rPT6tm3WilN3Si7GrDUlLCX4rUaShRAsmlRc6k9VPNBamF245vC14JpDuQN+mpbqb1FF CNNQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530pXxGhqCain2LO9MUtncKuoBImpL6Jl5VoTTeEx2ujmjFEtukz B8mTpS4tYcjpmnVHD6tlk7ZV1VtBdvtJOWPvidjCFD4H5G0=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzKcniUo4juZLsH8wLvRy9mCdR9dvRdf63r/32hh1qxI5bfc1k356wd6hYllB9TV8qf25e965gcCFwqwPT62NM=
X-Received: by 2002:a92:6804:: with SMTP id d4mr22363939ilc.5.1622559559025; Tue, 01 Jun 2021 07:59:19 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <CO1PR11MB4881058C5E8AB5CCADAF7158D83E9@CO1PR11MB4881.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
In-Reply-To: <CO1PR11MB4881058C5E8AB5CCADAF7158D83E9@CO1PR11MB4881.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
From: Alexander Pelov <a@ackl.io>
Date: Tue, 01 Jun 2021 16:59:08 +0200
Message-ID: <CACQW0Er4QszC6HxPxq7k4faBF3gw8-U28v0FKk6skwOQCUL8=A@mail.gmail.com>
To: "Pascal Thubert (pthubert)" <pthubert=40cisco.com@dmarc.ietf.org>
Cc: "6tisch@ietf.org" <6tisch@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000249f1505c3b59699"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/6tisch/g0nWNqESSEP0Bl5IOzM-ajxU59Q>
Subject: Re: [6tisch] Finally !!
X-BeenThere: 6tisch@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Discuss link layer model for Deterministic IPv6 over the TSCH mode of IEEE 802.15.4e, and impacts on RPL and 6LoWPAN such as resource allocation" <6tisch.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/6tisch>, <mailto:6tisch-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/6tisch/>
List-Post: <mailto:6tisch@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:6tisch-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6tisch>, <mailto:6tisch-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 01 Jun 2021 14:59:26 -0000

Wonderful! Congrats to all the authors, the chairs and the contributors to
this amazing work!

Cheers,
Alexander


On Tue, Jun 1, 2021 at 4:56 PM Pascal Thubert (pthubert) <pthubert=
40cisco.com@dmarc.ietf.org> wrote:

> Dear all
>
>
>
> It is our greatest pleasure to announce that the following RFCs were just
> published on the IETF data tracker:
>
>
>
>
>
> RFC 9030 <https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/rfc9030/> *(was
> draft-ietf-6tisch-architecture)*
> *An Architecture for IPv6 over the Time-Slotted Channel Hopping Mode of
> IEEE 802.15.4 (6TiSCH)*
>
> 2021-05
> 57 pages
>
> New
>
> Informational RFC
>
>
>
> RFC 9031 <https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/rfc9031/> *(was
> draft-ietf-6tisch-minimal-security)*
> *Constrained Join Protocol (CoJP) for 6TiSCH*
>
> 2021-05
> 41 pages
>
> New
>
> Proposed Standard RFC
>
>
>
> RFC 9032 <https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/rfc9032/> *(was
> draft-ietf-6tisch-enrollment-enhanced-beacon)*
> *Encapsulation of 6TiSCH Join and Enrollment Information Elements*
>
> 2021-05
> 10 pages
>
> New
>
> Proposed Standard RFC
>
>
>
> RFC 9033 <https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/rfc9033/> *(was
> draft-ietf-6tisch-msf)*
> *6TiSCH Minimal Scheduling Function (MSF)*
>
> 2021-05
> 20 pages
>
> New
>
> Proposed Standard RFC
>
>
>
> This concludes the work items that this working group had on its plate.
>
>
>
> Many thanks to you all for years of hard work, in standards, open source
> implementation, and interop testing.
>
>
>
> Keep safe!
>
>
>
> The chairs
> _______________________________________________
> 6tisch mailing list
> 6tisch@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6tisch
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email