[6tisch] 6P and Sf0 issue: Piggybacking data packet with IE confirmation

"Prof. Diego Dujovne" <diego.dujovne@mail.udp.cl> Thu, 03 March 2016 15:41 UTC

Return-Path: <diego.dujovne@mail.udp.cl>
X-Original-To: 6tisch@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: 6tisch@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 59F701A19EF for <6tisch@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 3 Mar 2016 07:41:25 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 3.923
X-Spam-Level: ***
X-Spam-Status: No, score=3.923 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_50=0.8, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, URIBL_DBL_ABUSE_BOTCC=2.5] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id m4Vf1Yd5qTzH for <6tisch@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 3 Mar 2016 07:41:24 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-wm0-x229.google.com (mail-wm0-x229.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c09::229]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1CFD01A0AF1 for <6tisch@ietf.org>; Thu, 3 Mar 2016 07:41:23 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-wm0-x229.google.com with SMTP id l68so40622485wml.0 for <6tisch@ietf.org>; Thu, 03 Mar 2016 07:41:23 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=mail-udp-cl.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to; bh=gv6s2dzV/0G0tnoK/0snpQUef6bhF06BxrUeaT5TOic=; b=I3e/SG2jFW4QVnVWv4+HCu+tg62O8uq1PdYMpmOo5fcVFg1T+bKnosA1+NKilKC7jl LjXO+Gd8/cL5+BriwejGFmT8heeHYv42XNwHCS0EdP5enGFZfubFLdX3DKDlVvrR7XFu ohcPx3/4+WKUnLR6yfv8nPlu83DkYzFhjewBK06QNIA8ZZ08lbcrFS6ctVI7XMY8/1dv wbf+njeUuZh0n6NRH22SXO0JCAC0muhoouz5/c7JuVPYPXcF86OH//5ObnMtNOuPq6xb jdfNu7xuUadsr1EgTsGFhPS5ZG/Iz7QUrH0OH20HzccvMOn/CKtZ4PZhBONUuX55C9cD BV0g==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to; bh=gv6s2dzV/0G0tnoK/0snpQUef6bhF06BxrUeaT5TOic=; b=hQxd0pau7soVTlrSyJGJtpsvhCZYyL0kPLS9RfRGB2FEzenYAJQMIAtFOpL9Bezh/J JCKAD2dUzH/At60WOIR7+cVF0jWyKAP1ph2SONOwKaV7n/4660fwqLLkxMXI0zQxzsrc 19aAE8PJvMpYgzb6BhpKbd/qooCldTqZ+AH2lv9dlMEm2cEjywMmlR67WsHqtd8xovVd lAe+XD3ajit93MJeFr0P+z8Y2xH8kXrzm+AM00JVeBpJVlCai0lD1nZxMngekmY4c8xp KhKY/kSuDHFGMv27hvX8bQsEPAB6ApVKresCRYJutT0kFcnaI9+WuO9TDCOW6MFojP48 N6RQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AD7BkJJ4Ff+opAGUtLbwtiGgO7gSP0fMtbmYpJzgw/ovmGKBDYfbMOXV5soDu9IGdJQlIb+xYWakVD3k90tqmg==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.194.62.179 with SMTP id z19mr3913289wjr.96.1457019682471; Thu, 03 Mar 2016 07:41:22 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.28.11.195 with HTTP; Thu, 3 Mar 2016 07:41:22 -0800 (PST)
Date: Thu, 3 Mar 2016 12:41:22 -0300
Message-ID: <CAH7SZV9aOSjAfcCb9X0+0NmHEOm7EhSHZbFefi7oB+Swj8e=kg@mail.gmail.com>
From: "Prof. Diego Dujovne" <diego.dujovne@mail.udp.cl>
To: "6tisch@ietf.org" <6tisch@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=047d7b86dcb49ad98d052d26d4c3
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/6tisch/gBrCnlrLUZZM5DzU7HJBxd5P9t4>
Subject: [6tisch] 6P and Sf0 issue: Piggybacking data packet with IE confirmation
X-BeenThere: 6tisch@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Discuss link layer model for Deterministic IPv6 over the TSCH mode of IEEE 802.15.4e, and impacts on RPL and 6LoWPAN such as resource allocation" <6tisch.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/6tisch>, <mailto:6tisch-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/6tisch/>
List-Post: <mailto:6tisch@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:6tisch-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6tisch>, <mailto:6tisch-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 03 Mar 2016 15:41:25 -0000

Dear all,
            Given that there is parent preference in cell
selection, a child-initiated transaction triggers a three-step
exchange:
1- Child sends request to Parent with whitelist/blacklist of slotoffsets
2- Parent selects cells
3- Child acknowledges and finishes the transaction

The main idea is to enable an optional Piggybacking of the IE on a
data packet to reduce the number of transmitted packets, but there
are latency concerns when the (data) traffic is low.

Is it worth to enable this option given the added complexity?

Regards,

                                Diego Dujovne

-- 
DIEGO DUJOVNE
Académico Escuela de Ingeniería en Informática y Telecomunicaciones
Facultad de Ingeniería UDP
www.ingenieria.udp.cl
(56 2) 676 8125