IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [6tisch] [6tisch-security] proposed security text for architecture draft

Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca> Fri, 14 November 2014 01:43 UTC

Return-Path: <mcr@sandelman.ca>
X-Original-To: 6tisch@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: 6tisch@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EC7871A00ED; Thu, 13 Nov 2014 17:43:05 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.495
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.495 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.594, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id v-DVGeqV_eiw; Thu, 13 Nov 2014 17:43:00 -0800 (PST)
Received: from tuna.sandelman.ca (tuna.sandelman.ca [IPv6:2607:f0b0:f:3:216:3eff:fe7c:d1f3]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7B4CD1A00D0; Thu, 13 Nov 2014 17:43:00 -0800 (PST)
Received: from sandelman.ca (obiwan.sandelman.ca [209.87.249.21]) by tuna.sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1DAE320098; Thu, 13 Nov 2014 20:45:11 -0500 (EST)
Received: by sandelman.ca (Postfix, from userid 179) id 17DE6637F4; Thu, 13 Nov 2014 20:42:58 -0500 (EST)
Received: from sandelman.ca (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id F3945637EA; Thu, 13 Nov 2014 20:42:58 -0500 (EST)
From: Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
To: "Pascal Thubert (pthubert)" <pthubert@cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <E045AECD98228444A58C61C200AE1BD848A4F099@xmb-rcd-x01.cisco.com>
References: <20507.1415811045@sandelman.ca> <674F70E5F2BE564CB06B6901FD3DD78B272A8EFA@TGXML210.toshiba.local> <E045AECD98228444A58C61C200AE1BD848A4F099@xmb-rcd-x01.cisco.com>
X-Mailer: MH-E 8.2; nmh 1.3-dev; GNU Emacs 23.4.1
X-Face: $\n1pF)h^`}$H>Hk{L"x@)JS7<%Az}5RyS@k9X%29-lHB$Ti.V>2bi.~ehC0; <'$9xN5Ub# z!G,p`nR&p7Fz@^UXIn156S8.~^@MJ*mMsD7=QFeq%AL4m<nPbLgmtKK-5dC@#:k
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg="pgp-sha1"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
Date: Thu, 13 Nov 2014 20:42:58 -0500
Message-ID: <11870.1415929378@sandelman.ca>
Sender: mcr@sandelman.ca
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/6tisch/haZL-hMqISz_gmnpZeMkbzkPcLs
Cc: "6tisch@ietf.org" <6tisch@ietf.org>, "6tisch-security@ietf.org" <6tisch-security@ietf.org>, "yoshihiro.ohba@toshiba.co.jp" <yoshihiro.ohba@toshiba.co.jp>
Subject: Re: [6tisch] [6tisch-security] proposed security text for architecture draft
X-BeenThere: 6tisch@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Discuss link layer model for Deterministic IPv6 over the TSCH mode of IEEE 802.15.4e, and impacts on RPL and 6LoWPAN such as resource allocation" <6tisch.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/6tisch>, <mailto:6tisch-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/6tisch/>
List-Post: <mailto:6tisch@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:6tisch-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6tisch>, <mailto:6tisch-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 14 Nov 2014 01:43:06 -0000

Pascal Thubert (pthubert) <pthubert@cisco.com> wrote:
    > an interface ID associated to the address, which is missing in the RH.
    > Yesterday we discussed an "optimistic" usage of a global address that
    > the joining device would form.  This requires the joining device to
    > receive an RA. Is that unacceptable?

Yes, because the RA is always sent.

An open question was: could we find a way to hide the RA in the Enhanced
Beacon, which reduces a packet on the wire.

-- 
Michael Richardson <mcr+IETF@sandelman.ca>, Sandelman Software Works
 -= IPv6 IoT consulting =-

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email