Return-Path: X-Original-To: 6tisch@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: 6tisch@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DC4D51A88B0; Wed, 12 Nov 2014 12:53:12 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2.495 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.495 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.594, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 3FF8YmvS8E-s; Wed, 12 Nov 2014 12:53:11 -0800 (PST) Received: from tuna.sandelman.ca (tuna.sandelman.ca [209.87.249.19]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3D1871A870C; Wed, 12 Nov 2014 12:53:11 -0800 (PST) Received: from sandelman.ca (obiwan.sandelman.ca [IPv6:2607:f0b0:f:2::247]) by tuna.sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6B78E2016A; Wed, 12 Nov 2014 15:55:17 -0500 (EST) Received: by sandelman.ca (Postfix, from userid 179) id 8E5D4637F4; Wed, 12 Nov 2014 15:53:09 -0500 (EST) Received: from sandelman.ca (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 771C0637F2; Wed, 12 Nov 2014 15:53:09 -0500 (EST) From: Michael Richardson To: "Pascal Thubert \(pthubert\)" In-Reply-To: References: <20507.1415811045@sandelman.ca> X-Mailer: MH-E 8.2; nmh 1.3-dev; GNU Emacs 23.4.1 X-Face: $\n1pF)h^`}$H>Hk{L"x@)JS7<%Az}5RyS@k9X%29-lHB$Ti.V>2bi.~ehC0; <'$9xN5Ub# z!G,p`nR&p7Fz@^UXIn156S8.~^@MJ*mMsD7=QFeq%AL4m Sender: mcr@sandelman.ca Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/6tisch/jwWxW18HL_TlNqRsJ4V9-ch4ifY Cc: "6tisch@ietf.org" <6tisch@ietf.org>, "6tisch-security@ietf.org" <6tisch-security@ietf.org> Subject: Re: [6tisch] [6tisch-security] proposed security text for architecture draft X-BeenThere: 6tisch@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: "Discuss link layer model for Deterministic IPv6 over the TSCH mode of IEEE 802.15.4e, and impacts on RPL and 6LoWPAN such as resource allocation" <6tisch.ietf.org> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 12 Nov 2014 20:53:13 -0000 --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Pascal Thubert (pthubert) wrote: > For the initial connection to the join assistant, we said that we'd u= se > a well-known key by default, following Ren=C3=A9's initial > recommendation. At some point of time, we also discussed the > possibility to override that key by configuration to allow to > differentiate networks, making that key effectively a sort of ssid. I'll fix the text to include these points, which I agree that we said. =2D-=20 Michael Richardson , Sandelman Software Works -=3D IPv6 IoT consulting =3D- --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux) iQEVAwUBVGPIsoCLcPvd0N1lAQKBAQf/ab2tGBvOd59bDyNpTvwej1N91sFB13Ki opCrpU6FY5ST3Ey/43RRaaF9D0KRN+Asbd4FPV5ZrFd/nc3bii94212i3J3uRd9B 0EBGE7Dqesf0pTcxi4k1gAWP2yjd2HT8Zt4WMOPezrSis8Pa2N25zAh9bSRCawBW +DVYJXFU7iv7uLR/eMSMFoiPep6Dym4Iczp5m6Lp4CD8cmBG1WanK6KSYBTKmXZU qGeiZ4XbXAIRXFmI85Zitvq2C63qpbKsJVVe8AWEgDoKM4Qf8F9kqY9fifQCQQbB h82ARhvb+hCRalXpauBhwrxxPCwyGOJEzOz5ABaYn3c+meWS8/Yg4w== =8/u6 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=--