Re: [6tisch] OTF: IP or not IP?

"Prof. Diego Dujovne" <diego.dujovne@mail.udp.cl> Fri, 09 October 2015 19:33 UTC

Return-Path: <diego.dujovne@mail.udp.cl>
X-Original-To: 6tisch@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: 6tisch@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3A1021A014C for <6tisch@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 9 Oct 2015 12:33:28 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.977
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.977 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id V_9cAnSrIY6u for <6tisch@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 9 Oct 2015 12:33:24 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-wi0-f177.google.com (mail-wi0-f177.google.com [209.85.212.177]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 52D0D1A036D for <6tisch@ietf.org>; Fri, 9 Oct 2015 12:33:24 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by wicfx3 with SMTP id fx3so83595815wic.1 for <6tisch@ietf.org>; Fri, 09 Oct 2015 12:33:22 -0700 (PDT)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=REwHcyLE/FHvhltmq/mr2I8X3+Bs63ysfMzbyZrjOjY=; b=hppUA+In6S3GmUfITOb9yju5onL7EVEdl1V9b3RXHI8SHIolUJfMr0vWBLOlwIddJX mL0G96psat4rhCtJBUkFwszWx9aM2eyp010UUTdaZ/26t+Il6mcR7uF3GaLwOtdQuyI2 9clgdPBhbdKhFeKi65uwWnZ/jsMcQHcBdN8OMIheQoTMTI1ysWYbBjrpPtCoRayufVH8 A14O7vuJHLvYLkfiI5wpQv3oWWIaLgsLbS9uTWMXudthc6snn+Z9uCCeEJUvZPF9LlRo 9yWC5LWw9ThbD3bqU7OitlnRHOlDIjifypyiut3sYCKWytcu1I1l4CZ2ckrZUmRTozPt Oiog==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQnLLN9E7+JdcsWMEi0/skFa7qoWobl7JAngqP3F2dZ61fqc3aXYQyayKQUe19eYg6f2aneD
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.194.175.232 with SMTP id cd8mr17804928wjc.45.1444419202563; Fri, 09 Oct 2015 12:33:22 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.28.9.84 with HTTP; Fri, 9 Oct 2015 12:33:22 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <4a8c164cec374130a33d3e8535de72fb@XCH-RCD-001.cisco.com>
References: <197177af4dd145889c61c7e283f708ee@XCH-RCD-001.cisco.com> <E400B9A0-4B14-4B86-9D3A-D79D360A51B2@kinneyconsultingllc.com> <4a8c164cec374130a33d3e8535de72fb@XCH-RCD-001.cisco.com>
Date: Fri, 09 Oct 2015 16:33:22 -0300
Message-ID: <CAH7SZV9oAf_2rgCCB4XpQEtbW5JEGvnPw6Dih9EVdOZ9nwQjBw@mail.gmail.com>
From: "Prof. Diego Dujovne" <diego.dujovne@mail.udp.cl>
To: "Pascal Thubert (pthubert)" <pthubert@cisco.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="089e013d102079f9c70521b10d7d"
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/6tisch/lq1HxPjWJrT27rp6v9E_BWQUqeA>
Cc: "6tisch@ietf.org" <6tisch@ietf.org>, Pat Kinney <pat.kinney@kinneyconsultingllc.com>
Subject: Re: [6tisch] OTF: IP or not IP?
X-BeenThere: 6tisch@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Discuss link layer model for Deterministic IPv6 over the TSCH mode of IEEE 802.15.4e, and impacts on RPL and 6LoWPAN such as resource allocation" <6tisch.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/6tisch>, <mailto:6tisch-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/6tisch/>
List-Post: <mailto:6tisch@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:6tisch-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6tisch>, <mailto:6tisch-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 09 Oct 2015 19:33:28 -0000

Pascal, Pat:
                  Sounds good to me "6tisch routers".
Regards,

                          Diego


2015-10-09 12:59 GMT-03:00 Pascal Thubert (pthubert) <pthubert@cisco.com>:

> Good point Pat.
>
> I found it strange as well as I was rereading this.
>
> Should I say 6TiSCH routers?
>
>
>
> Cheers,
>
>
>
> Pascal
>
>
>
> *From:* Pat Kinney [mailto:pat.kinney@kinneyconsultingllc.com]
> *Sent:* vendredi 9 octobre 2015 17:53
> *To:* Pascal Thubert (pthubert) <pthubert@cisco.com>
> *Cc:* 6tisch@ietf.org
> *Subject:* Re: [6tisch] OTF: IP or not IP?
>
>
>
> Pascal;
>
>
>
> I agree with your change, but I wonder why we need to consider only IoT
> routers?  Shouldn’t we removed the IoT constraint?
>
>
>
> Pat
>
>
>
> Pat Kinney
>
> *Kinney Consulting LLC*
>
> IEEE 802.15 WG vice chair, SC chair
>
> ISA100 co-chair, ISA100.20 chair
>
> O: +1.847.960.3715
>
> pat.kinney@kinneyconsultingllc.com
>
>
>
> On 9, Oct2015, at 10:48, Pascal Thubert (pthubert) <pthubert@cisco.com>
> wrote:
>
>
>
> Dear all:
>
>
>
> Following up on the comments at the interim, My suggestion is to update
> item 3 as follows:
>
>
>
>
>
> 3. Produce an “On-the-fly" (OTF) specification to enable a distributed
> dynamic
>
> scheduling of time slots with the capability for IoT routers to appropriate
>
> chunks of the matrix without starving, or interfering with, other 6TiSCH
> nodes.
>
> This particular work will focus on IP traffic since the work on tracks is
> not
>
> yet advanced enough to specify their requirements for OTF operations.
>
>
>
> I remove the ‘for IP traffic’ within the main text to indicate that the
> initial focus is
>
> N IP traffic but I hope that now it is more clear that future work on
> tracks is not precluded.
>
> Does that address the comment?
>
>
>
> Cheers,
>
>
>
> Pascal
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> 6tisch mailing list
> 6tisch@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6tisch
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> 6tisch mailing list
> 6tisch@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6tisch
>
>


-- 
DIEGO DUJOVNE
Académico Escuela de Ingeniería en Informática y Telecomunicaciones
Facultad de Ingeniería UDP
www.ingenieria.udp.cl
(56 2) 676 8125