Re: [6tisch] Time to Live - ASN in a packet
Thomas Watteyne <thomas.watteyne@inria.fr> Thu, 25 August 2016 08:27 UTC
Return-Path: <thomas.watteyne@inria.fr>
X-Original-To: 6tisch@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: 6tisch@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DF4E912D779 for <6tisch@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 25 Aug 2016 01:27:39 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -7.447
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.447 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.548] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id rVFgV0cJl34a for <6tisch@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 25 Aug 2016 01:27:36 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail3-relais-sop.national.inria.fr (mail3-relais-sop.national.inria.fr [192.134.164.104]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9824412D775 for <6tisch@ietf.org>; Thu, 25 Aug 2016 01:27:35 -0700 (PDT)
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.28,575,1464645600"; d="scan'208,217";a="191036926"
Received: from mail-yw0-f179.google.com ([209.85.161.179]) by mail3-relais-sop.national.inria.fr with ESMTP/TLS/AES128-GCM-SHA256; 25 Aug 2016 10:27:33 +0200
Received: by mail-yw0-f179.google.com with SMTP id z8so25394583ywa.1 for <6tisch@ietf.org>; Thu, 25 Aug 2016 01:27:33 -0700 (PDT)
X-Gm-Message-State: AE9vXwN77T0LZJVRSAvlw2teRt2xwXcrFxspM5k66GMNReTkbshnD/7sj1ragjUV7PSEnGnKkayf4b9ZaUmohw==
X-Received: by 10.129.106.139 with SMTP id f133mr6072676ywc.163.1472113651578; Thu, 25 Aug 2016 01:27:31 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.37.110.193 with HTTP; Thu, 25 Aug 2016 01:27:11 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <43558bc9ae794dc388b38fb4338fa92b@XCH-RCD-001.cisco.com>
References: <831143327.491.1472104637789.JavaMail.open-xchange@webmail.cdac.in> <CADJ9OA8JFyfNy-w==eS6NyJrQFt-jU+6B_EW=Q4rXHu-4o9mzQ@mail.gmail.com> <43558bc9ae794dc388b38fb4338fa92b@XCH-RCD-001.cisco.com>
From: Thomas Watteyne <thomas.watteyne@inria.fr>
Date: Thu, 25 Aug 2016 10:27:11 +0200
X-Gmail-Original-Message-ID: <CADJ9OA8Mct17qGkXiNviXNqGz9=t4G+yp5dgKqaQzL9q1qhFgA@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <CADJ9OA8Mct17qGkXiNviXNqGz9=t4G+yp5dgKqaQzL9q1qhFgA@mail.gmail.com>
To: "Pascal Thubert (pthubert)" <pthubert@cisco.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a11473b40457bac053ae12b2b"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/6tisch/mmilpE9Uka48H628b9fOMNr6Ve4>
Cc: Lijo Thomas <lijo@cdac.in>, "6tisch@ietf.org" <6tisch@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [6tisch] Time to Live - ASN in a packet
X-BeenThere: 6tisch@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Discuss link layer model for Deterministic IPv6 over the TSCH mode of IEEE 802.15.4e, and impacts on RPL and 6LoWPAN such as resource allocation" <6tisch.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/6tisch>, <mailto:6tisch-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/6tisch/>
List-Post: <mailto:6tisch@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:6tisch-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6tisch>, <mailto:6tisch-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 25 Aug 2016 08:27:40 -0000
Lijjo, One quick idea. If you are running on a testbed (e.g. https://www.iot-lab.info/), you could print the timestamp of when a packet passes through the nodes over their serial port. Thomas On Thu, Aug 25, 2016 at 10:09 AM, Pascal Thubert (pthubert) < pthubert@cisco.com> wrote: > Hello Lijo: > > > > Like Thomas, I’d love to understand what your case and solution approach > is. Is asynchronous OAM like the openWSN application enough for you? Or > else are you looking for per packet information to as to monitor and maybe > influence the forwarding and delivery? > > > > In the latter case, your work may be related to other efforts, and if your > experimentation is successful then why not consider a more general > applicability? > > > > All in all I have this feeling that time-aware forwarding is on the way, > in which exact shape and form is left TBD: > > - DetNet is discussing validating the end-to-end latency of > individual packets to make sure that the delivery was within bounds. Is > that similar to your need? > > - I’ve participated to work where the QoS of the packet was > estimated at each hop depending on whether the packet was early or late vs. > a predefined schedule. This makes things much simpler but slightly less > deterministic than a tight scheduling. > > - There’s also OAM work that uses HbH headers to monitor the > packets as they flow along the network (IOW, in band as opposed to > asynchronous OAM packets) > > > > My understanding is that you want HbH behavior. > > - If you are doing a mesh, you can probable hack a mesh header. > > - But if you are considering a larger applicability (I hope so!) > then you probably want to hack at L3. > > > > You can find tons of ideas of what can be done at L3 in various > environments in https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-dt-detnet-dp-alt-03, > which is pending adoption call. > > > > But if you narrow down to 6TiSCH, then you probably want to design you own > option in the HbH header and incode it in a 6LoRH similar to the RPL RPI. > You may use ASN to start with, but when going standard you’ll have to > abstract that a little bit, even if the data in the packet is unchanged. > > > > Very keen to hear more! > > > > Pascal > > > > *From:* 6tisch [mailto:6tisch-bounces@ietf.org] *On Behalf Of *Thomas > Watteyne > *Sent:* jeudi 25 août 2016 08:28 > *To:* Lijo Thomas <lijo@cdac.in> > *Cc:* 6tisch@ietf.org > *Subject:* Re: [6tisch] Time to Live - ASN in a packet > > > > Lijo, > > > > It looks like you are describing two things: the TTL (or hop limit in IPv6 > parlance) which decrements by one by each router, and some timestamp which > can be used to measure end -to-end latency. I'm assuming the latter. > > > > I'm also assuming you are doing this as part of an experiment, to look at > the end-to-end/hop-by-hop latency. In that context, you probably aren't > looking for standardizing that (or even standards-compliance during your > experiment), but more at an implementation technique to keep that > information. > > > > Of course, the answer depends entirely on the information we are missing. > But assuming you are playing with the OpenWSN implementation, there is > already an application called rrt which sends the ASN as application > payload at the source, and records the ASN when the DAGroot has received > that. You can then substract one by the other and do some stats. Please ask > further questions to the OpenWSN community [1] as such technical discussion > on a particular implementation doesn't belong on the 6TiSCH WG ML. > > > > If you are using the commercial SmartMesh IP solution by Linear Tech [2], > good news, all of that is already built in. The manager (~DAGroot) keeps > track of timing and can send you average latencies for each of your nodes. > If you're interested, you can look at these numbers "live" on deployments > in Argentina [3,4] or California [5]. As you might imagine, > latency/throughput/lifetime trade-off for one another, so there is a handy > "performance estimator" tool you can use [6,7]. For further question on > this topic, please use www.dustcloud.org. > > > > Finally, looking at lowering latency in 6TiSCH has been an important > research topic in the last year or so. Look for example at the "Low-Latency > Scheduling Function" [8] work which lowers the per-hop latency to 10's of > ms withing the 6TiSCH framework. > > > > Thomas > > > > [1] www.openwsn.org > > [2] www.linear.com/dust > > [3] http://www.savethepeaches.com/ > > [4] PEACH: Predicting Frost Events in Peach Orchards Using IoT Technology. > Thomas Watteyne, Ana Laura Diedrichs, Keoma Brun-Laguna, Javier Emilio > Chaar, Diego Dujovne, Juan Carlos Taffernaberry, Gustavo Mercado. EAI > Endorsed Transactions on the Internet of Things, to appear in 2016. > > [5] http://www.snowhow.io/ > > [6] http://www.linear.com/docs/42452 > > [7] Industrial IEEE802.15.4e Networks: Performance and Trade-offs. Thomas > Watteyne, Joy Weiss, Lance Doherty, Jonathan Simon. IEEE International > Conference on Communications (IEEE ICC), Internet of Things Symposium, > London, UK, 8-12 June 2015. > > [8] LLSF: Low Latency Scheduling Function for 6TiSCH Networks. Tengfei > Chang, Thomas Watteyne, Qin Wang, Xavier Vilajosana. IEEE International > Conference on Distributed Computing in Sensor Systems (DCOSS), Washington, > DC, USA, 26-28 May 2016. > > > > On Thu, Aug 25, 2016 at 7:57 AM, Lijo Thomas <lijo@cdac.in> wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > We are working on problem which needs the *Time to Live (TTL) information* > in terms of *ASN * to be included as part of the Packet. > > > > We require the intermediate nodes to update TTL at each hop. > > > > How this information can be passed in a 6tisch framework. > > > > Suggestions are welcome.. > > > > Thanks & Regards > > Lijo Thomas > > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------ > ------------------------------------------------------------------- > [ C-DAC is on Social-Media too. Kindly follow us at: > Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/CDACINDIA & Twitter: @cdacindia ] > > This e-mail is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may > contain confidential and privileged information. If you are not the > intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply e-mail and destroy > all copies and the original message. Any unauthorized review, use, > disclosure, dissemination, forwarding, printing or copying of this email > is strictly prohibited and appropriate legal action will be taken. > ------------------------------------------------------------ > ------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > _______________________________________________ > 6tisch mailing list > 6tisch@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6tisch > > > > > > -- > > _______________________________________ > > > > Thomas Watteyne, PhD > > Research Scientist & Innovator, Inria > > Sr Networking Design Eng, Linear Tech > > Founder & co-lead, UC Berkeley OpenWSN > > Co-chair, IETF 6TiSCH > > > > www.thomaswatteyne.com > > _______________________________________ > -- _______________________________________ Thomas Watteyne, PhD Research Scientist & Innovator, Inria Sr Networking Design Eng, Linear Tech Founder & co-lead, UC Berkeley OpenWSN Co-chair, IETF 6TiSCH www.thomaswatteyne.com _______________________________________
- [6tisch] Time to Live - ASN in a packet Lijo Thomas
- Re: [6tisch] Time to Live - ASN in a packet Thomas Watteyne
- Re: [6tisch] Time to Live - ASN in a packet Pascal Thubert (pthubert)
- Re: [6tisch] Time to Live - ASN in a packet Thomas Watteyne
- Re: [6tisch] Time to Live - ASN in a packet Lijo Thomas
- Re: [6tisch] Time to Live - ASN in a packet Shwetha Bhandari (shwethab)
- Re: [6tisch] Time to Live - ASN in a packet Thomas Watteyne
- Re: [6tisch] Time to Live - ASN in a packet Pascal Thubert (pthubert)
- Re: [6tisch] Time to Live - ASN in a packet Thomas Watteyne
- Re: [6tisch] Time to Live - ASN in a packet Lijo Thomas
- [6tisch] FW: Re: Time to Live - ASN in a packet Lijo Thomas
- Re: [6tisch] Time to Live - ASN in a packet Shwetha Bhandari (shwethab)
- Re: [6tisch] Time to Live - ASN in a packet Thomas Watteyne
- Re: [6tisch] Time to Live - ASN in a packet Thomas Watteyne
- Re: [6tisch] Time to Live - ASN in a packet Pascal Thubert (pthubert)
- Re: [6tisch] Time to Live - ASN in a packet Michael Richardson