[6tisch] 6P and Sf0 issue: Statistics for SFs and Relocation

"Prof. Diego Dujovne" <diego.dujovne@mail.udp.cl> Thu, 03 March 2016 19:25 UTC

Return-Path: <diego.dujovne@mail.udp.cl>
X-Original-To: 6tisch@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: 6tisch@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D1B031B4192 for <6tisch@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 3 Mar 2016 11:25:36 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 3.924
X-Spam-Level: ***
X-Spam-Status: No, score=3.924 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AC_DIV_BONANZA=0.001, BAYES_50=0.8, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, URIBL_DBL_ABUSE_BOTCC=2.5] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id BIR3SnPyuw3Q for <6tisch@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 3 Mar 2016 11:25:33 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-wm0-x22f.google.com (mail-wm0-x22f.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c09::22f]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 586A11B419B for <6tisch@ietf.org>; Thu, 3 Mar 2016 11:25:32 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-wm0-x22f.google.com with SMTP id l68so3742466wml.1 for <6tisch@ietf.org>; Thu, 03 Mar 2016 11:25:32 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=mail-udp-cl.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to; bh=xcvEoZB8/KlEgbmxxFJaEZp1EhiuYIIC7tPHSq8uMZo=; b=Cm4B95Belq/5udiBWqqK9jwiGrKJGZLuKrTfQbfD0/sSYu2wlCD+N3WA77RMhgHg5O ksabnXrPuTLvwMEQXR+LLL7xpTFDjBOvnHNbQFebc+ULtiORORu+a3q2zCKdbhPm6ynW 5p5ZLRuUxePwIo+bXbNoP/DQurYEANrKBi144Xnv+bd8iaGnw2YL4On+wtN4PbPuRdzX s3lffCTnomixMu6/2hRzMG+ztGhx8lHRy/HEsogzitE4p9YkMmdl4wwQTyoA4t5Ep+to vrrfxl1tT8mfQi8O+MwvtUYPrvmFVMsEBr5ljA8ZaWd8LW90ZUnvxJ6LY07aU/icLg3s FYZQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to; bh=xcvEoZB8/KlEgbmxxFJaEZp1EhiuYIIC7tPHSq8uMZo=; b=dVrtIpQlxzpiDwFpgJumgTLUgk31dmgtMeH/4OWVBOppcY1KPnRf9kPp+ZVR3jzSMs 5Fhn+Ok/efHNQyW1m+E+voyowFXdfOyym0e6IfX3gDi8/bcf2nur8ayelsr1vwotWMMS vX933LRkBwTKgSt4EUZvReb7LI8HR32jt/ddCWU4w33ec/mhSks/HtEGJyO7Oo//dvml ny6V0hNPfBzR1oIOWAYIpMRfQ4WJBu0Uhf8OYzYVgYtqqEInpMKlLpta+/po9vspz+m3 P3ZpO3vtGjvpAGyJ3HfkHSO9p3RGKe9SvAIhYiXh4IsrbMM/SIiOvJJYyuuTA6lKGTQv mC0Q==
X-Gm-Message-State: AD7BkJKf/vC1uOOzFnBRyrBjnYuZEgZAiuHETZHlWlkM71XGYlMLZoNoXh+6WU01ScKko7h32ZjWIGT/KoLkrg==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.194.91.175 with SMTP id cf15mr4724185wjb.7.1457033131317; Thu, 03 Mar 2016 11:25:31 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.28.11.195 with HTTP; Thu, 3 Mar 2016 11:25:31 -0800 (PST)
Date: Thu, 3 Mar 2016 16:25:31 -0300
Message-ID: <CAH7SZV92xOj-sCZrhfA9pkiusO_cfrBScDkbShfEJE_Rv-TeAQ@mail.gmail.com>
From: "Prof. Diego Dujovne" <diego.dujovne@mail.udp.cl>
To: "6tisch@ietf.org" <6tisch@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=047d7bfcebc637f30e052d29f690
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/6tisch/mpE-8MVdsr14IQWGhuCZS055EIw>
Subject: [6tisch] 6P and Sf0 issue: Statistics for SFs and Relocation
X-BeenThere: 6tisch@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Discuss link layer model for Deterministic IPv6 over the TSCH mode of IEEE 802.15.4e, and impacts on RPL and 6LoWPAN such as resource allocation" <6tisch.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/6tisch>, <mailto:6tisch-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/6tisch/>
List-Post: <mailto:6tisch@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:6tisch-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6tisch>, <mailto:6tisch-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 03 Mar 2016 19:25:37 -0000

Dear all,
           Given the requirements to build SFs exposed
in the 6tisch sublayer draft, there is no specification
on how to obtain the statistics and calculate and build
the metrics used to decide when to add/delete/relocate
cells. The draft asks only for the set of rules.
          SF0 defines an algorithm using specific values
as thresholds and rules for adding/removing cells and
uses PDR and a simple decision rule to decide which
cell to relocate.  However, this may not be the case
for the other (possibly more complex) SFs, where
metrics based on statistics could be included.
           Shall we include a section on the description
of how to calculate the specific statistics used on each
SF, or just leave this out of scope to the implementer?
My point of view is that statistics should be specified
in order to be able to interoperate between different
implementations of the same SF.
            What do you think?
            Thank you,

                                  Diego Dujovne


-- 
DIEGO DUJOVNE
Académico Escuela de Ingeniería en Informática y Telecomunicaciones
Facultad de Ingeniería UDP
www.ingenieria.udp.cl
(56 2) 676 8125