Re: [6tisch] for the Plugtest: New Version Notification for draft-ietf-6lo-routing-dispatch-04.txt
"Pascal Thubert (pthubert)" <pthubert@cisco.com> Sun, 24 January 2016 19:42 UTC
Return-Path: <pthubert@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: 6tisch@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: 6tisch@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B59AC1ACEBC for <6tisch@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 24 Jan 2016 11:42:05 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -14.502
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.502 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id yqbAwDTptLb4 for <6tisch@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 24 Jan 2016 11:42:03 -0800 (PST)
Received: from rcdn-iport-8.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-8.cisco.com [173.37.86.79]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9D2521ACEEC for <6tisch@ietf.org>; Sun, 24 Jan 2016 11:42:03 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=6150; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1453664523; x=1454874123; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:references: in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version; bh=J++GJi+YMyLs8Jx1xSGFoMsNN35wgPa+d5H/ekCWLyE=; b=SCp7pWBvpKXJx+FIgif7zQHrtDx2uTvcqc94AAhjFZPQLqJiVJQKcDe0 5uG5IF2SETPdwYPlYyF/gBET4mV1v1FxmrUh8aq9vSftgISHXtFIJe6OC oGvUDadCYBmWdD+TpleSujl0nrw23JrIPLhKlpbcX1R+4GIs6sYN44glC Q=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0D8AQB1KKVW/5FdJa1egzpSbQaIUbIJAQ2BYhgKhSNKAhyBADgUAQEBAQEBAYEKhEEBAQEEAQEBIAQNOgkCDAQCAQgRBAEBAQICIwMCAgIfBgsUAQgIAQEEDgUIh34DEg6uD4pPDYNuAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBFXuFN4RtgkmBZgoYMgKCR4E6BY0qiUwBhUWGGIFxgWVKg3qIV4Z9h0EBHgEBQoI0gTVqhkB8AQEB
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.22,341,1449532800"; d="scan'208";a="64715859"
Received: from rcdn-core-9.cisco.com ([173.37.93.145]) by rcdn-iport-8.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 24 Jan 2016 19:42:02 +0000
Received: from XCH-RCD-003.cisco.com (xch-rcd-003.cisco.com [173.37.102.13]) by rcdn-core-9.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id u0OJg2nl012823 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Sun, 24 Jan 2016 19:42:02 GMT
Received: from xch-rcd-001.cisco.com (173.37.102.11) by XCH-RCD-003.cisco.com (173.37.102.13) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1104.5; Sun, 24 Jan 2016 13:42:01 -0600
Received: from xch-rcd-001.cisco.com ([173.37.102.11]) by XCH-RCD-001.cisco.com ([173.37.102.11]) with mapi id 15.00.1104.009; Sun, 24 Jan 2016 13:42:01 -0600
From: "Pascal Thubert (pthubert)" <pthubert@cisco.com>
To: Simon Duquennoy <simonduq@sics.se>
Thread-Topic: [6tisch] for the Plugtest: New Version Notification for draft-ietf-6lo-routing-dispatch-04.txt
Thread-Index: AdFV17975/lsRI3xTgujMkKPEjX8GABIB8AAAAY2+7A=
Date: Sun, 24 Jan 2016 19:41:48 +0000
Deferred-Delivery: Sun, 24 Jan 2016 19:41:32 +0000
Message-ID: <e0b440fa87c840c3820bd4923d790af9@XCH-RCD-001.cisco.com>
References: <767aa1dde264436482388a21fd96b318@XCH-RCD-001.cisco.com> <CAMxvJt+kWq8CyuD-BrvPGtu76MOzQGka-sakWvr_UNZAo0hn9w@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAMxvJt+kWq8CyuD-BrvPGtu76MOzQGka-sakWvr_UNZAo0hn9w@mail.gmail.com>
Accept-Language: fr-FR, en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted
x-originating-ip: [10.55.22.5]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/6tisch/mv5sf0d1V5HBkXHhnvii9tqUzYQ>
Cc: "6tisch@ietf.org" <6tisch@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [6tisch] for the Plugtest: New Version Notification for draft-ietf-6lo-routing-dispatch-04.txt
X-BeenThere: 6tisch@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Discuss link layer model for Deterministic IPv6 over the TSCH mode of IEEE 802.15.4e, and impacts on RPL and 6LoWPAN such as resource allocation" <6tisch.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/6tisch>, <mailto:6tisch-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/6tisch/>
List-Post: <mailto:6tisch@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:6tisch-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6tisch>, <mailto:6tisch-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 24 Jan 2016 19:42:05 -0000
I opened 4, Simon : ) But I consider 2 of them solved. Please let me know If you think differently... Cheers, Pascal > -----Original Message----- > From: simon.duquennoy@gmail.com [mailto:simon.duquennoy@gmail.com] > On Behalf Of Simon Duquennoy > Sent: dimanche 24 janvier 2016 17:38 > To: Pascal Thubert (pthubert) <pthubert@cisco.com> > Cc: 6tisch@ietf.org > Subject: Re: [6tisch] for the Plugtest: New Version Notification for draft-ietf- > 6lo-routing-dispatch-04.txt > > Thanks Pascal for opening the issues, and I agree we stick to the current > draft for the plugtest. > /Simon > > > On Sat, Jan 23, 2016 at 1:18 PM, Pascal Thubert (pthubert) > <pthubert@cisco.com> wrote: > > Dear all: > > > > > > > > I uploaded the changes made after the discussions on the 6lo ML and > > conformed at the interim Friday. > > > > There are 2 discussions left open, for a better compression of the RH > > when the boundary is not a power of 2 (Simon) and whether we should > > refrain from consuming the addresses of the RH as we go (Simon and > > Anand). For both, there is an active ticket at 6lo: > > > > > > > > #14: More optimal compression of 6LoRH > > > > #11: RH3 6LoRH not recoverable > > > > > > > > For the plugtest, though, I suggest we live with what we have, > > draft-ietf-6lo-routing-dispatch-04.txt and > > draft-ietf-6lo-paging-dispatch-01.txt. > > > > > > > > Note: With this spec an example of Downward Packet In Non-Storing > > Mode will > > be: > > > > > > > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+- ... +-+-+- ... -+-+-- ... -+-+- ... -+-+-+-+-+ ... +-... > > > > |11110001 |RH3-6LoRH | RPI-6LoRH | IP-in-IP | NH=1 |11110CPP| UDP | > > |UDP > > > > |Page 1 |Type1 S=2 | | 6LoRH | IPHC | UDP | hdr |load > > > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+- ... +-+-+- ... -+-+-- ... -+-+- ... -+-+-+-+-+ ... +-... > > > > <-8bytes-> <- RFC 6282 -> > > > > No RPL artifact > > > > > > > > Figure 20: Example Compressed Packet with RH3. > > > > > > > > Are we OK? > > > > > > > > Pascal > > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > > From: internet-drafts@ietf.org [mailto:internet-drafts@ietf.org] > > > > Sent: samedi 23 janvier 2016 13:07 > > > > To: Robert Cragie <robert.cragie@gridmerge.com>; Pascal Thubert > > (pthubert) <pthubert@cisco.com>; Dr. Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org>; > > Laurent Toutain <laurent.toutain@telecom-bretagne.eu>; Carsten > Bormann > > <cabo@tzi.org>; Laurent Toutain <Laurent.Toutain@telecom-bretagne.eu> > > > > Subject: New Version Notification for > > draft-ietf-6lo-routing-dispatch-04.txt > > > > > > > > > > > > A new version of I-D, draft-ietf-6lo-routing-dispatch-04.txt > > > > has been successfully submitted by Pascal Thubert and posted to the > > IETF repository. > > > > > > > > Name: draft-ietf-6lo-routing-dispatch > > > > Revision: 04 > > > > Title: 6LoWPAN Routing Header > > > > Document date: 2016-01-23 > > > > Group: 6lo > > > > Pages: 31 > > > > URL: > > https://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-6lo-routing-dispatch-0 > > 4.txt > > > > Status: > > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-6lo-routing-dispatch/ > > > > Htmlized: > > https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-6lo-routing-dispatch-04 > > > > Diff: > > https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-6lo-routing-dispatch-04 > > > > > > > > Abstract: > > > > This specification introduces a new 6LoWPAN dispatch type for use > > in > > > > 6LoWPAN Route-Over topologies, that initially covers the needs of > > RPL > > > > (RFC6550) data packets compression. Using this dispatch type, this > > > > specification defines a method to compress RPL Option (RFC6553) > > > > information and Routing Header type 3 (RFC6554), an efficient > > IP-in- > > > > IP technique and is extensible for more applications. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of > > submission until the htmlized version and diff are available at > tools.ietf.org. > > > > > > > > The IETF Secretariat > > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > 6tisch mailing list > > 6tisch@ietf.org > > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6tisch > >
- [6tisch] for the Plugtest: New Version Notificati… Pascal Thubert (pthubert)
- Re: [6tisch] for the Plugtest: New Version Notifi… Simon Duquennoy
- Re: [6tisch] for the Plugtest: New Version Notifi… S.V.R.Anand
- Re: [6tisch] for the Plugtest: New Version Notifi… Xavier Vilajosana
- Re: [6tisch] for the Plugtest: New Version Notifi… Pascal Thubert (pthubert)