[6tisch] Complementing the 6BBR on the backbone
"Pascal Thubert (pthubert)" <pthubert@cisco.com> Fri, 01 February 2019 13:34 UTC
Return-Path: <pthubert@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: 6tisch@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: 6tisch@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E75C0126BED; Fri, 1 Feb 2019 05:34:23 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -19.052
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-19.052 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-4.553, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ZkBtApNFTLDn; Fri, 1 Feb 2019 05:34:20 -0800 (PST)
Received: from alln-iport-5.cisco.com (alln-iport-5.cisco.com [173.37.142.92]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3399B127133; Fri, 1 Feb 2019 05:34:20 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=5069; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1549028060; x=1550237660; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:mime-version; bh=9m9KyxId1DBgNjtCCpvIqdbfI3iJeIcCCt1MCdsYS40=; b=YQ6LI2hiKU9w9yR93mj/ao3P0vbAlKztx1wa4peCn/Doe7LgX6BO1Y59 mHqAo2LPEIuAe6qU/o/9RKP83FA2mX3YEt6Scr6sOCBS9jTJz7OFIlua6 YDNxjwOY5IiS1G2Zjs1BiBz38nLvRuFUuLJUv7VpBa0E/AP+/0P3/y2op w=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0ADAAAfSlRc/5hdJa1kGQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQcBAQEBAQGBUQQBAQEBAQsBgQ1ILmeBAzGME4tzhUSLdoJygk6DIRSBZwsBASOESYMSIjQJDQEDAQECAQECbRwMhX5MEgGBACYBBA4NgxuBHWQPqyWEMgKFfQWMQBeBQD+DdYNMAQEDgSYRhgcCkAuSXAkChy6FQoU8IZJAiiCFL4wFAhEUgScfOEKBFHAVO4Jtix2FP0GKeoEugR8BAQ
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.56,548,1539648000"; d="scan'208,217";a="233804994"
Received: from rcdn-core-1.cisco.com ([173.37.93.152]) by alln-iport-5.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 01 Feb 2019 13:34:18 +0000
Received: from XCH-RCD-005.cisco.com (xch-rcd-005.cisco.com [173.37.102.15]) by rcdn-core-1.cisco.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id x11DYIVT018391 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Fri, 1 Feb 2019 13:34:18 GMT
Received: from xch-rcd-001.cisco.com (173.37.102.11) by XCH-RCD-005.cisco.com (173.37.102.15) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1395.4; Fri, 1 Feb 2019 07:34:17 -0600
Received: from xch-rcd-001.cisco.com ([173.37.102.11]) by XCH-RCD-001.cisco.com ([173.37.102.11]) with mapi id 15.00.1395.000; Fri, 1 Feb 2019 07:34:17 -0600
From: "Pascal Thubert (pthubert)" <pthubert@cisco.com>
To: "'6lo@ietf.org'" <6lo@ietf.org>
CC: "6tisch@ietf.org" <6tisch@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: Complementing the 6BBR on the backbone
Thread-Index: AdS6McsKOYvwREoJTHqufPNd4wus9Q==
Date: Fri, 01 Feb 2019 13:34:01 +0000
Deferred-Delivery: Fri, 1 Feb 2019 13:32:58 +0000
Message-ID: <51b4a40867984c34ab79cebff861a886@XCH-RCD-001.cisco.com>
Accept-Language: fr-FR, en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted
x-originating-ip: [10.228.216.10]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_51b4a40867984c34ab79cebff861a886XCHRCD001ciscocom_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Outbound-SMTP-Client: 173.37.102.15, xch-rcd-005.cisco.com
X-Outbound-Node: rcdn-core-1.cisco.com
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/6tisch/nIqgPIy17yL6A5NFVeb75Ia32B0>
Subject: [6tisch] Complementing the 6BBR on the backbone
X-BeenThere: 6tisch@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Discuss link layer model for Deterministic IPv6 over the TSCH mode of IEEE 802.15.4e, and impacts on RPL and 6LoWPAN such as resource allocation" <6tisch.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/6tisch>, <mailto:6tisch-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/6tisch/>
List-Post: <mailto:6tisch@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:6tisch-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6tisch>, <mailto:6tisch-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 01 Feb 2019 13:34:24 -0000
Dear all: As you know, the 6BBR is an ND proxy for the wireless devices. As it goes, even if together the 6BBRs represent a distributed database of all the wireless devices, the capability to lookup that database is still missing. The proposal on the table is to have eth 6BBR also act as a 6LR and use a central 6LBR on the backbone to register all the addresses with the proxied MAC. This way, the 6LBR can be looked up and the NS(Lookup) message can be unicast. https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-thubert-6lo-unicast-lookup-00 describes the way to deploy and query the 6BBR for DAD and Lookup. The feature can coexist with the classical multicast NS(Lookup). It is not limited to wireless addresses, all nodes on the backbone including fxed servers can benefit from it. By avoiding the multicast on the backbone, the unicast look up change sthe scalability of the whole network. Comments are welcome, on the 6lo list. All the best, Pascal
- [6tisch] Complementing the 6BBR on the backbone Pascal Thubert (pthubert)