Re: [6tisch] #41 (minimal): intended status for draft minimal

"Pascal Thubert (pthubert)" <pthubert@cisco.com> Mon, 30 November 2015 18:39 UTC

Return-Path: <pthubert@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: 6tisch@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: 6tisch@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9284B1A19E3 for <6tisch@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 30 Nov 2015 10:39:47 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -14.511
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.511 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id e0h2zjBrRwkD for <6tisch@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 30 Nov 2015 10:39:46 -0800 (PST)
Received: from rcdn-iport-6.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-6.cisco.com [173.37.86.77]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 733C71A1A50 for <6tisch@ietf.org>; Mon, 30 Nov 2015 10:39:46 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=1741; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1448908786; x=1450118386; h=from:to:subject:date:message-id:references:in-reply-to: content-transfer-encoding:mime-version; bh=gm0bMDRHnNobBJf7AeFFX/pCZ2sYaNpbUkHkepjqLUU=; b=OKfY0pKn+D4Ti+cMW1IuIulmTLoQqj6utbVNwEOwUyG0OB+iTkDOhbUx 6UNhnX0XwcqKw/kLMoXSDdhS8cIktDJVGzcJ7uMLN+84XAfKzaKvfaHLs cMZ1qnpFl3imr6T2bHxsmUp84rP5gSEgPJfpQ1wU+VtKv51gc4rnJpA7A g=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0D+AQBmllxW/5ldJa1SDA6DLYFCBr4pAQ2BZoYPAoEzOBQBAQEBAQEBgQqENAEBAQQdHUsEAgEIEQQBAQEeCQcyFAkIAgQBEgiIJrs7AQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBGIZUhH6EJQGFEwWWVwGNMIFiki2IWAEfAQFCg0Y+coRqgQcBAQE
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.20,365,1444694400"; d="scan'208";a="51355255"
Received: from rcdn-core-2.cisco.com ([173.37.93.153]) by rcdn-iport-6.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 30 Nov 2015 18:39:45 +0000
Received: from XCH-ALN-003.cisco.com (xch-aln-003.cisco.com [173.36.7.13]) by rcdn-core-2.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id tAUIdjXi003625 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Mon, 30 Nov 2015 18:39:45 GMT
Received: from xch-rcd-001.cisco.com (173.37.102.11) by XCH-ALN-003.cisco.com (173.36.7.13) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1104.5; Mon, 30 Nov 2015 12:39:44 -0600
Received: from xch-rcd-001.cisco.com ([173.37.102.11]) by XCH-RCD-001.cisco.com ([173.37.102.11]) with mapi id 15.00.1104.000; Mon, 30 Nov 2015 12:39:44 -0600
From: "Pascal Thubert (pthubert)" <pthubert@cisco.com>
To: Brian Haberman <brian@innovationslab.net>, Kris Pister <ksjp@berkeley.edu>, "6tisch@ietf.org" <6tisch@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [6tisch] #41 (minimal): intended status for draft minimal
Thread-Index: AQHRK5p36V0nAa8jCUiRyTSj7mfzwZ604o+A
Date: Mon, 30 Nov 2015 18:39:34 +0000
Deferred-Delivery: Mon, 30 Nov 2015 18:39:12 +0000
Message-ID: <6764bccfd3074fbe87dfba3ea8d9afc3@XCH-RCD-001.cisco.com>
References: <060.92a20915e49c32f8bffbbbb0b4a66869@tools.ietf.org> <075.1f97e51c53b1c124937a2b6c7fca39d7@tools.ietf.org> <a864c3f122d24d638adf712ed92054cd@XCH-RCD-001.cisco.com> <565C8BC8.900@berkeley.edu> <565C8E1E.3040106@innovationslab.net> <565C8EB7.5000902@berkeley.edu> <565C911C.4070209@innovationslab.net>
In-Reply-To: <565C911C.4070209@innovationslab.net>
Accept-Language: fr-FR, en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted
x-originating-ip: [10.55.22.4]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/6tisch/sQVTTfM3O2qQPi_VZ4BWpEpGyng>
Subject: Re: [6tisch] #41 (minimal): intended status for draft minimal
X-BeenThere: 6tisch@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Discuss link layer model for Deterministic IPv6 over the TSCH mode of IEEE 802.15.4e, and impacts on RPL and 6LoWPAN such as resource allocation" <6tisch.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/6tisch>, <mailto:6tisch-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/6tisch/>
List-Post: <mailto:6tisch@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:6tisch-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6tisch>, <mailto:6tisch-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 30 Nov 2015 18:39:47 -0000

We have to explore that a bit. 

To start with, TSCH is a 802.15.4 and we planned to reuse all 6LoWPAN as is, and more importantly, minimal enables to follow 802.15.4 and 6LoWPAN as they evolves. 
So a product will have to say, minimal + 802.15.4 revision blah, plus 6LoWPAN RFCS xxxx xxxx xxxx, etc...
For instance 6TiSCH also defines a backbone mode with a 6BBR, the document is under adoption call at 6lo, and if the process succeeds, that will update 6LoWPAN and be usable by a minimal implementation.  Same goes for the RPL artifact compression, which is also under adoption at 6lo. 

How do you suggest we word this?

Pascal


> -----Original Message-----
> From: 6tisch [mailto:6tisch-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Brian Haberman
> Sent: lundi 30 novembre 2015 19:11
> To: Kris Pister <ksjp@berkeley.edu>; 6tisch@ietf.org
> Subject: Re: [6tisch] #41 (minimal): intended status for draft minimal
> 
> Hi Kris,
> 
> On 11/30/15 1:00 PM, Kris Pister wrote:
> > That was the original goal.
> >
> 
> Hmm... Then there may be more things missing from this document then.
> IPv6 address generation rules/guidance, NDP operation, SLAAC functionality,
> MTU behavior, etc. all come to mind for that kind of document. Granted, those
> may be covered via reference to other RFCs...
> 
> The main point is that if that is the goal, it is not clear when the Abstract starts
> with "This document describes the minimal set of rules to operate an IEEE
> 802.15.4 Timeslotted Channel Hopping (TSCH) network."
> 
> Brian
> 
> > ksjp
> >
> > On 11/30/2015 9:57 AM, Brian Haberman wrote:
> >> Is this document supposed
> >> to be the 802.15.4e equivalent of RFC 2464?