Re: [6tisch] for the Plugtest: New Version Notification for draft-ietf-6lo-routing-dispatch-04.txt

Simon Duquennoy <simonduq@sics.se> Sun, 24 January 2016 16:37 UTC

Return-Path: <simon.duquennoy@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: 6tisch@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: 6tisch@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 635A91A1B51 for <6tisch@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 24 Jan 2016 08:37:59 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.278
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.278 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id wWVmgEkbKAfT for <6tisch@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 24 Jan 2016 08:37:57 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-wm0-x235.google.com (mail-wm0-x235.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c09::235]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7C0F81A1B4B for <6tisch@ietf.org>; Sun, 24 Jan 2016 08:37:57 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-wm0-x235.google.com with SMTP id r129so38034807wmr.0 for <6tisch@ietf.org>; Sun, 24 Jan 2016 08:37:57 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject :from:to:cc:content-type; bh=r20Vopc8ev4bKHm3h97S6CnHJyz2OP3ZsB+Oz/Z9zh8=; b=t03zJP2TvObA2ZfRBnGKq3zgtS4Mqfs5jl924F0ugP0n7QZFxbKWJN9jrlv7oiIZFV RJ3PGjF4Ler3kgc329npo0gX40utIMih6iyuK47pme8gFFweXT1haMZ4fvF9Lh8878UZ PkyIuRhXX9vAIbIbcWujXGgTITC2Of8Bm6Bjiw9kZz1MkePMSGU4pEp+2HsoRv5ltca5 JztuRe4CrTkpwh/hSsUo9TL5d3eUBpLvbCY2GEqxv7CwIbRythSaCq8XAerg61Rg4k5d T5szADkZDbZ+NbOgYMWsrq25eIHnTqIEPuM15LJek5iuBqxeIIAlarIv79HNAaLUzs5H kW6A==
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=sics-se.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject :from:to:cc:content-type; bh=r20Vopc8ev4bKHm3h97S6CnHJyz2OP3ZsB+Oz/Z9zh8=; b=V6RNM+jJQMrOPSQc81yby0QqJum9+Z8SKdlc7U0Qajc3e3+Maq28VlMDgGVnWSyJsk 69Eq5WnC1s0fuKWDpiAihr0ZxlWRCSqxLyNdHH2PpO43/QyrFaVdIaNW45R5RSZXtDzM lJCb5bDp4r5r+mM+whEATbtuKCxPCLXKvrD2asdZhHO7MPVgg6dY3uFJIv1pu0PI8cF9 xTfxYwnjADioIdhTDzAa75MALKVIZfWUIQx7EZod8hzKabQkOhXxq8/JTSLLJ2YrAB9q JD3CzuZ4tZVQRn8gmU4d56vww8LyfeMcKIBf+AZH0y7XHg2M1rGJcK1gGreDSKwgoSr8 2ICg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=r20Vopc8ev4bKHm3h97S6CnHJyz2OP3ZsB+Oz/Z9zh8=; b=lU5bDsxbNSiL5tEF597qqNt0Q8paj/T6x8pMGwgsOtFZezI+mRdkvRqmAKIcR8Mw9Z SjRH9Z8C7S+s3VanU6XCIALjohYMJPWPRkTCKnEMVzE3wbZi+9q0W+wHOinnJvMqC7LV Z12C6K/z6ZgNIvoLXuHzzaN1TQ+X5JZG3y1M2u/ycbKI8tlKR5mCiByIlEaI16vBnGqr mV5FrISoTMR3zutoXW5MKu+VHPRoGhqOEqWf/X4v6JSBZWdMFxrVPnp3to+Nl22VTsry ZyTOf12yAbM/+cYdnlwF6WGpuCJEgp5GP8JTdTFttnGjTv8vEjr2y1BPlszeRioCwcmq 18Sg==
X-Gm-Message-State: AG10YOSG7q8kUKE4BNNPih4fLgqftlYDKmh2+ErOeXPYlWLeAfT/g0c0uocImohZUq6Ch7uKkD8eG7ZlJmgpbQ==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.28.176.131 with SMTP id z125mr14684699wme.5.1453653476096; Sun, 24 Jan 2016 08:37:56 -0800 (PST)
Sender: simon.duquennoy@gmail.com
Received: by 10.194.79.97 with HTTP; Sun, 24 Jan 2016 08:37:56 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <767aa1dde264436482388a21fd96b318@XCH-RCD-001.cisco.com>
References: <767aa1dde264436482388a21fd96b318@XCH-RCD-001.cisco.com>
Date: Sun, 24 Jan 2016 17:37:56 +0100
X-Google-Sender-Auth: Vtv4ErmBTUJsZIXr1gYMZZm__4M
Message-ID: <CAMxvJt+kWq8CyuD-BrvPGtu76MOzQGka-sakWvr_UNZAo0hn9w@mail.gmail.com>
From: Simon Duquennoy <simonduq@sics.se>
To: "Pascal Thubert (pthubert)" <pthubert@cisco.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/6tisch/t0o9K1H3KDNJJsAEqyYeBsee9MM>
Cc: "6tisch@ietf.org" <6tisch@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [6tisch] for the Plugtest: New Version Notification for draft-ietf-6lo-routing-dispatch-04.txt
X-BeenThere: 6tisch@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Discuss link layer model for Deterministic IPv6 over the TSCH mode of IEEE 802.15.4e, and impacts on RPL and 6LoWPAN such as resource allocation" <6tisch.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/6tisch>, <mailto:6tisch-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/6tisch/>
List-Post: <mailto:6tisch@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:6tisch-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6tisch>, <mailto:6tisch-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 24 Jan 2016 16:37:59 -0000

Thanks Pascal for opening the issues, and I agree we stick to the
current draft for the plugtest.
/Simon


On Sat, Jan 23, 2016 at 1:18 PM, Pascal Thubert (pthubert)
<pthubert@cisco.com> wrote:
> Dear all:
>
>
>
> I uploaded the changes made after the discussions on the 6lo ML and
> conformed at the interim Friday.
>
> There are 2 discussions left open, for a better compression of the RH when
> the boundary is not a power of 2 (Simon) and whether we should refrain from
> consuming the addresses of the RH as we go (Simon and Anand). For both,
> there is an active ticket at 6lo:
>
>
>
> #14: More optimal compression of 6LoRH
>
> #11: RH3 6LoRH not recoverable
>
>
>
> For the plugtest, though, I suggest we live with what we have,
> draft-ietf-6lo-routing-dispatch-04.txt and
> draft-ietf-6lo-paging-dispatch-01.txt.
>
>
>
> Note: With this spec an example of  Downward Packet In Non-Storing Mode will
> be:
>
>
>
> +-+-+-+-+-+-+- ... +-+-+- ... -+-+-- ... -+-+- ... -+-+-+-+-+ ... +-...
>
> |11110001 |RH3-6LoRH | RPI-6LoRH | IP-in-IP | NH=1 |11110CPP| UDP | UDP
>
> |Page 1   |Type1 S=2 |           |  6LoRH   | IPHC | UDP    | hdr |load
>
> +-+-+-+-+-+-+- ... +-+-+- ... -+-+-- ... -+-+- ... -+-+-+-+-+ ... +-...
>
>             <-8bytes->                         <-  RFC 6282      ->
>
>                                                 No RPL artifact
>
>
>
>               Figure 20: Example Compressed Packet with RH3.
>
>
>
> Are we OK?
>
>
>
> Pascal
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
>
> From: internet-drafts@ietf.org [mailto:internet-drafts@ietf.org]
>
> Sent: samedi 23 janvier 2016 13:07
>
> To: Robert Cragie <robert.cragie@gridmerge.com>om>; Pascal Thubert (pthubert)
> <pthubert@cisco.com>om>; Dr. Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org>rg>; Laurent Toutain
> <laurent.toutain@telecom-bretagne.eu>eu>; Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org>rg>;
> Laurent Toutain <Laurent.Toutain@telecom-bretagne.eu>
>
> Subject: New Version Notification for draft-ietf-6lo-routing-dispatch-04.txt
>
>
>
>
>
> A new version of I-D, draft-ietf-6lo-routing-dispatch-04.txt
>
> has been successfully submitted by Pascal Thubert and posted to the IETF
> repository.
>
>
>
> Name:                  draft-ietf-6lo-routing-dispatch
>
> Revision:              04
>
> Title:                     6LoWPAN Routing Header
>
> Document date: 2016-01-23
>
> Group:                  6lo
>
> Pages:                  31
>
> URL:
> https://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-6lo-routing-dispatch-04.txt
>
> Status:
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-6lo-routing-dispatch/
>
> Htmlized:
> https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-6lo-routing-dispatch-04
>
> Diff:
> https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-6lo-routing-dispatch-04
>
>
>
> Abstract:
>
>    This specification introduces a new 6LoWPAN dispatch type for use in
>
>    6LoWPAN Route-Over topologies, that initially covers the needs of RPL
>
>    (RFC6550) data packets compression.  Using this dispatch type, this
>
>    specification defines a method to compress RPL Option (RFC6553)
>
>    information and Routing Header type 3 (RFC6554), an efficient IP-in-
>
>    IP technique and is extensible for more applications.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of submission
> until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org.
>
>
>
> The IETF Secretariat
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> 6tisch mailing list
> 6tisch@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6tisch
>