Re: [6tisch] Mirja Kühlewind's No Objection on draft-ietf-6tisch-enrollment-enhanced-beacon-13: (with COMMENT)

Mirja Kuehlewind <ietf@kuehlewind.net> Fri, 21 February 2020 12:46 UTC

Return-Path: <ietf@kuehlewind.net>
X-Original-To: 6tisch@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: 6tisch@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 23675120823; Fri, 21 Feb 2020 04:46:17 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.897
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.897 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id PmeHRui2omR3; Fri, 21 Feb 2020 04:46:13 -0800 (PST)
Received: from wp513.webpack.hosteurope.de (wp513.webpack.hosteurope.de [IPv6:2a01:488:42:1000:50ed:8223::]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9ECE0120847; Fri, 21 Feb 2020 04:46:13 -0800 (PST)
Received: from 200116b824c4be0061570d07dc536186.dip.versatel-1u1.de ([2001:16b8:24c4:be00:6157:d07:dc53:6186]); authenticated by wp513.webpack.hosteurope.de running ExIM with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) id 1j57h1-0004Qf-Sf; Fri, 21 Feb 2020 13:46:07 +0100
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 12.4 \(3445.104.11\))
From: Mirja Kuehlewind <ietf@kuehlewind.net>
In-Reply-To: <3085.1582225727@dooku>
Date: Fri, 21 Feb 2020 13:46:07 +0100
Cc: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>, pthubert@cisco.com, 6tisch-chairs@ietf.org, 6tisch@ietf.org, draft-ietf-6tisch-enrollment-enhanced-beacon@ietf.org
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <78BD6307-1595-4796-90B6-C59196F7FE7A@kuehlewind.net>
References: <158202907388.14130.11373306134419981744.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <3085.1582225727@dooku>
To: Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.104.11)
X-bounce-key: webpack.hosteurope.de;ietf@kuehlewind.net;1582289173;36990174;
X-HE-SMSGID: 1j57h1-0004Qf-Sf
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/6tisch/tlbKw_L3yUD1TR_sTEjq65q-yuI>
Subject: Re: [6tisch] =?utf-8?q?Mirja_K=C3=BChlewind=27s_No_Objection_on_draf?= =?utf-8?q?t-ietf-6tisch-enrollment-enhanced-beacon-13=3A_=28with_COMMENT?= =?utf-8?q?=29?=
X-BeenThere: 6tisch@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Discuss link layer model for Deterministic IPv6 over the TSCH mode of IEEE 802.15.4e, and impacts on RPL and 6LoWPAN such as resource allocation" <6tisch.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/6tisch>, <mailto:6tisch-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/6tisch/>
List-Post: <mailto:6tisch@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:6tisch-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6tisch>, <mailto:6tisch-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 21 Feb 2020 12:46:29 -0000

Thanks!

> On 20. Feb 2020, at 20:08, Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca> wrote:
> 
> 
> Mirja Kühlewind via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org> wrote:
>> One question: How is the proxy priority supposed to be calculated/set?
>> Is there a default value?
> 
> draft-ietf-roll-enrollment-priority describes a way to calculate it when RPL
> is used.   The calculation needs to take into account available network
> resources along the paths down to the Join Proxy, and also network-wide
> "enthuasiam" for new nodes.
> I will add a reference: these two documents started as a single document, but
> seem to have never gained appropriate cross-links.
> 
>> Editorial comment: I would recommend to repeat the abstract in the
>> intro as, as stated in the RFC style guide RFC7322 section 4.3, "[...]
>> an Abstract is not a substitute for an Introduction; the RFC should be
>> self-contained as if there were no Abstract."
> 
> yes, that's good, I'll move and merge some text.
> 
>> Nit: sec 1.3: s/Although However/Although/ or s/Although
>> However/However/ ?  s/a unicast RS may be transmitted in
>> response[RFC6775] reduces the amount of.../a unicast RS that may be
>> transmitted in response [RFC6775] reduces the amount of.../ ? (Also
>> note missing space before [)
> 
> already edited, i hope you it will make more sense.
> 
> --
> Michael Richardson <mcr+IETF@sandelman.ca>ca>, Sandelman Software Works
> -= IPv6 IoT consulting =-
> 
> 
>