Re: [6tisch] Mirja Kühlewind's No Objection on draft-ietf-6tisch-enrollment-enhanced-beacon-13: (with COMMENT)

[Michael Richardson <[e-mail]>]

Mirja Kühlewind via Datatracker <[e-mail]> wrote:
    > One question: How is the proxy priority supposed to be calculated/set?
    > Is there a default value?

draft-ietf-roll-enrollment-priority describes a way to calculate it when RPL
is used.   The calculation needs to take into account available network
resources along the paths down to the Join Proxy, and also network-wide
"enthuasiam" for new nodes.
I will add a reference: these two documents started as a single document, but
seem to have never gained appropriate cross-links.

    > Editorial comment: I would recommend to repeat the abstract in the
    > intro as, as stated in the RFC style guide RFC7322 section 4.3, "[...]
    > an Abstract is not a substitute for an Introduction; the RFC should be
    > self-contained as if there were no Abstract."

yes, that's good, I'll move and merge some text.

    > Nit: sec 1.3: s/Although However/Although/ or s/Although
    > However/However/ ?  s/a unicast RS may be transmitted in
    > response[RFC6775] reduces the amount of.../a unicast RS that may be
    > transmitted in response [RFC6775] reduces the amount of.../ ? (Also
    > note missing space before [)

already edited, i hope you it will make more sense.

--
Michael Richardson <[e-mail]>, Sandelman Software Works
 -= IPv6 IoT consulting =-