[6tisch] for the Plugtest: New Version Notification for draft-ietf-6lo-routing-dispatch-04.txt

"Pascal Thubert (pthubert)" <pthubert@cisco.com> Sat, 23 January 2016 12:18 UTC

Return-Path: <pthubert@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: 6tisch@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: 6tisch@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com []) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BAD991ACE27 for <6tisch@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 23 Jan 2016 04:18:14 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -14.501
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.501 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id PPgftvuQcUwQ for <6tisch@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 23 Jan 2016 04:18:12 -0800 (PST)
Received: from rcdn-iport-7.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-7.cisco.com []) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 94F9B1ACE16 for <6tisch@ietf.org>; Sat, 23 Jan 2016 04:18:12 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=18086; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1453551492; x=1454761092; h=from:to:subject:date:message-id:mime-version; bh=tucj/j8LlHxJhYuX7vpLClnHPqVztpfbhmfOCwVnNEk=; b=J2Ad6haqdrvNXYwBWrGZJPTrl/nQd9nt6JVdbh3ubehlpprWBTODYMYB RUx4njAhCz5aNC5gt7q8dG1VIXkZR7aPyhsPNcle/py8wwi1JAkXFU/Qi Ooqta5H1UW8qir3x6UM1E96iG/Qt3+4xm7vIrWK+FkR5jrdrwWUFty4FV 8=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos; i="5.22,336,1449532800"; d="scan'208,217"; a="64412507"
Received: from rcdn-core-3.cisco.com ([]) by rcdn-iport-7.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 23 Jan 2016 12:18:11 +0000
Received: from XCH-RCD-003.cisco.com (xch-rcd-003.cisco.com []) by rcdn-core-3.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id u0NCIBWP022172 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL) for <6tisch@ietf.org>; Sat, 23 Jan 2016 12:18:11 GMT
Received: from xch-rcd-001.cisco.com ( by XCH-RCD-003.cisco.com ( with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1104.5; Sat, 23 Jan 2016 06:18:10 -0600
Received: from xch-rcd-001.cisco.com ([]) by XCH-RCD-001.cisco.com ([]) with mapi id 15.00.1104.009; Sat, 23 Jan 2016 06:18:10 -0600
From: "Pascal Thubert (pthubert)" <pthubert@cisco.com>
To: "6tisch@ietf.org" <6tisch@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: for the Plugtest: New Version Notification for draft-ietf-6lo-routing-dispatch-04.txt
Thread-Index: AdFV17975/lsRI3xTgujMkKPEjX8GA==
Date: Sat, 23 Jan 2016 12:18:09 +0000
Deferred-Delivery: Sat, 23 Jan 2016 12:17:57 +0000
Message-ID: <767aa1dde264436482388a21fd96b318@XCH-RCD-001.cisco.com>
Accept-Language: fr-FR, en-US
Content-Language: en-US
x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted
x-originating-ip: []
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_767aa1dde264436482388a21fd96b318XCHRCD001ciscocom_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/6tisch/u_hHkeM1l29mDgys_731bmrsw6c>
Subject: [6tisch] for the Plugtest: New Version Notification for draft-ietf-6lo-routing-dispatch-04.txt
X-BeenThere: 6tisch@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Discuss link layer model for Deterministic IPv6 over the TSCH mode of IEEE 802.15.4e, and impacts on RPL and 6LoWPAN such as resource allocation" <6tisch.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/6tisch>, <mailto:6tisch-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/6tisch/>
List-Post: <mailto:6tisch@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:6tisch-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6tisch>, <mailto:6tisch-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 23 Jan 2016 12:18:14 -0000

Dear all:

I uploaded the changes made after the discussions on the 6lo ML and conformed at the interim Friday.

There are 2 discussions left open, for a better compression of the RH when the boundary is not a power of 2 (Simon) and whether we should refrain from consuming the addresses of the RH as we go (Simon and Anand). For both, there is an active ticket at 6lo:

#14: More optimal compression of 6LoRH

#11: RH3 6LoRH not recoverable

For the plugtest, though, I suggest we live with what we have, draft-ietf-6lo-routing-dispatch-04.txt and draft-ietf-6lo-paging-dispatch-01.txt.

Note: With this spec an example of  Downward Packet In Non-Storing Mode will be:

+-+-+-+-+-+-+- ... +-+-+- ... -+-+-- ... -+-+- ... -+-+-+-+-+ ... +-...

|11110001 |RH3-6LoRH | RPI-6LoRH | IP-in-IP | NH=1 |11110CPP| UDP | UDP

|Page 1   |Type1 S=2 |           |  6LoRH   | IPHC | UDP    | hdr |load

+-+-+-+-+-+-+- ... +-+-+- ... -+-+-- ... -+-+- ... -+-+-+-+-+ ... +-...

            <-8bytes->                         <-  RFC 6282      ->

                                                No RPL artifact

              Figure 20: Example Compressed Packet with RH3.

Are we OK?


-----Original Message-----

From: internet-drafts@ietf.org [mailto:internet-drafts@ietf.org]

Sent: samedi 23 janvier 2016 13:07

To: Robert Cragie <robert.cragie@gridmerge.com>; Pascal Thubert (pthubert) <pthubert@cisco.com>; Dr. Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org>; Laurent Toutain <laurent.toutain@telecom-bretagne.eu>; Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org>; Laurent Toutain <Laurent.Toutain@telecom-bretagne.eu>

Subject: New Version Notification for draft-ietf-6lo-routing-dispatch-04.txt

A new version of I-D, draft-ietf-6lo-routing-dispatch-04.txt

has been successfully submitted by Pascal Thubert and posted to the IETF repository.

Name:                  draft-ietf-6lo-routing-dispatch

Revision:              04

Title:                     6LoWPAN Routing Header

Document date: 2016-01-23

Group:                  6lo

Pages:                  31

URL:            https://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-6lo-routing-dispatch-04.txt

Status:         https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-6lo-routing-dispatch/

Htmlized:       https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-6lo-routing-dispatch-04

Diff:           https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-6lo-routing-dispatch-04


   This specification introduces a new 6LoWPAN dispatch type for use in

   6LoWPAN Route-Over topologies, that initially covers the needs of RPL

   (RFC6550) data packets compression.  Using this dispatch type, this

   specification defines a method to compress RPL Option (RFC6553)

   information and Routing Header type 3 (RFC6554), an efficient IP-in-

   IP technique and is extensible for more applications.

Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of submission until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org.

The IETF Secretariat